Author Topic: Dive bombing in Lancasters  (Read 2071 times)

Offline Bronk

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9044
Re: Dive bombing in Lancasters
« Reply #45 on: February 08, 2009, 12:58:20 PM »


It's easy,  try and keep up :aok If F3 mode was disabled, the ability for the "dogfighting" A20s and IL2s would be greatly curtailed, simply because the views would be realistic!  :cool:

I wouldn't know as I don't use the f3 in an IL-2. Also I think I can count on one hand times I've flown the A-20.
See Rule #4

Offline moot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 16330
      • http://www.dasmuppets.com
Re: Dive bombing in Lancasters
« Reply #46 on: February 08, 2009, 01:18:36 PM »


It's easy,  try and keep up :aok If F3 mode was disabled, the ability for the "dogfighting" A20s and IL2s would be greatly curtailed, simply because the views would be realistic!  :cool:
I doubt Humble or Widewing rely on F3 to make the A20 dance.
Hello ant
running very fast
I squish you

Offline WWhiskey

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3122
Re: Dive bombing in Lancasters
« Reply #47 on: February 08, 2009, 01:23:12 PM »
shreck
10K--> ? <  that's a dive bombing run if I've ever seen one !     The tracers give away the LIE 




there are no tracers in the pictures !!!
 if you look close at the first pic you see there is no ack at all!!!
 all you do see is the explosions from the bombs hitting
first pic shows 3 splashes from first pickle of bombs, no flashes, no tracers only smoke from #3 engine from flack burst on approach
 the fire you see is the candle that was already lit when i got there!!


back away from the coolaid the mister :rofl :rofl
« Last Edit: February 08, 2009, 01:25:27 PM by WWhiskey »
Flying since tour 71.

Offline Bronk

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9044
Re: Dive bombing in Lancasters
« Reply #48 on: February 08, 2009, 01:27:31 PM »





there are no tracers in the pictures !!!


Hmm

Tracer?
See Rule #4

Offline Anaxogoras

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7072
Re: Dive bombing in Lancasters
« Reply #49 on: February 08, 2009, 01:28:27 PM »
I doubt Humble or Widewing rely on F3 to make the A20 dance.

Last evening (Friday), I was flying an A-20 with 50% fuel southwest of A27 on the NDisles map....And yes, when flying a bomber I do use F3 view (can't see behind).

http://home.att.net/~historyzone/Gofbat.ahf
gavagai
334th FS


RPS for Aces High!

Offline Chalenge

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15179
Re: Dive bombing in Lancasters
« Reply #50 on: February 08, 2009, 01:36:51 PM »
If you like the Sick Puppy Custom Sound Pack the please consider contributing for future updates by sending a months dues to Hitech Creations for account "Chalenge." Every little bit helps.

Offline WWhiskey

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3122
Re: Dive bombing in Lancasters
« Reply #51 on: February 08, 2009, 01:46:30 PM »

no tracers here about one frame diff in film from that to this

the angle off the light you are pointing does not come from the cv as well and it looks to be a fire flare but it could be plane firing at me , but i think i still have the film if you really want to argue the point, also the guns in the pic are not even pointed at me, at high alt this is the way they would be   at low alt they would be aimed, kinda like when you see a tank at a long distance, it looks to be pointed away ye the rounds come at you
« Last Edit: February 08, 2009, 01:51:32 PM by WWhiskey »
Flying since tour 71.

Offline Bronk

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9044
Re: Dive bombing in Lancasters
« Reply #52 on: February 08, 2009, 01:52:01 PM »
2nd picture just before the top turret. What is that?
See Rule #4

Offline shreck

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 893
Re: Dive bombing in Lancasters
« Reply #53 on: February 08, 2009, 01:55:03 PM »
no dive bombing in these pics! just a good hit from about 10,000 feet
hard turn right after pickle to make myself a smaller target, for ack

(Image removed from quote.)
(Image removed from quote.)

Why hard right turn to for smaller target,  for ack ?  and your view looks about 3K after pull out "zoomed in"   :aok  just saying  :)

Offline WWhiskey

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3122
Re: Dive bombing in Lancasters
« Reply #54 on: February 08, 2009, 01:56:40 PM »
2nd picture just before the top turret. What is that?
not all that sure but it is not there 1/30th of a second before and there is no other ack firing, you can not get that close to a cv at anything less than 7000 feet without ack everywere, if it is ack then it could be a manned ack, but his aim was way off!
Flying since tour 71.

Offline moot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 16330
      • http://www.dasmuppets.com
Re: Dive bombing in Lancasters
« Reply #55 on: February 08, 2009, 01:58:33 PM »

But could they not do as well without it?  I've screwed around with the A20 and don't need six-oc view except to quickly look behind without having auto-level interrupt like it does if I jump in the gunner position.


BTW whatever happened to the bottom gunner position?  Didn't someone send the pictures of the real ones that were all Superfly needed to model it?
Hello ant
running very fast
I squish you

Offline shreck

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 893
Re: Dive bombing in Lancasters
« Reply #56 on: February 08, 2009, 01:59:07 PM »


Now that's what I'm talkin about  :aok  nice find Anax

Offline WWhiskey

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3122
Re: Dive bombing in Lancasters
« Reply #57 on: February 08, 2009, 01:59:23 PM »
Why hard right turn to for smaller target,  for ack ?  and your view looks about 3K after pull out "zoomed in"   :aok  just saying  :)
real good camera trick, in film viewer i set it up with zoom on the cv then backed the camera out of the plane, you can get pics the make ranges appear really close, for the effect
 the hard turn was to make the plane as small as i could so that a gunner, thru the smoke, might not see or be able to hit it
« Last Edit: February 08, 2009, 02:01:49 PM by WWhiskey »
Flying since tour 71.

Offline Ratpack1

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 357
      • The Ryan Sayer Show @ OnTilt Radio
Re: Dive bombing in Lancasters
« Reply #58 on: February 08, 2009, 01:59:45 PM »
now this is the 13th time this week for this topic. Maybe more
When you get where you're going, that's where you are! -Mike Brady
172nd Rabid Dawgs
"The Real" Commander of Awesome (Stick "Ozzie Nelson" Pig)

Offline WWhiskey

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3122
Re: Dive bombing in Lancasters
« Reply #59 on: February 08, 2009, 02:05:36 PM »



two pics from diff angles to show the distance effect
 first one looks about  100 or so the second looks atleast 600,
 same shot tho
Flying since tour 71.