Author Topic: He-162 It did See Combat!,Possable Perk? (Read 1475 times)

Sturm · « **Reply #45 on:** March 29, 2001, 08:28:00 AM »

D0-335 perked? Were talking a porky fighter, no manueverability what so ever 1 30mm and 2 15mm guns, not including wingpod or other variants. Were talking about a buff killer only. Yes it is fast, but speed kills most of the time.

------------------
Sturm6 StaffelKapitän
JV44 Platzschutzstaffel
Airfield Defense Squadron

Pepe · « **Reply #46 on:** March 29, 2001, 08:47:00 AM »

Do-335 should be perked: You never know if it's coming or going....Just put the infamous Typhoon backward cannons (ala RAM) and you get the ultimate killing machine

(just a cheap joke)

Pepe

R4M · « **Reply #47 on:** March 29, 2001, 11:03:00 AM »

pepe, 7 meses despues, y sigo convencido de que era un tramposo de mierda.

Solo te dire una cosa...jamas lo vi de nuevo en la MA. por que sera?.

brady · « **Reply #48 on:** March 29, 2001, 07:39:00 PM »

aper...did u see the quotes posted above it was a good handling machine "the best of the German Jets"

------------------

[This message has been edited by brady (edited 03-29-2001).]

-aper- · « **Reply #49 on:** March 29, 2001, 08:26:00 PM »

brady

I know the test reports from NII-VVS (Russia) where the captured He-162s were tested. The report was:
He-162 has total unharmony on oversensitive controls. It makes the flight unstable, tricky and dangerous especially for unexperienced pilots. The plane needs too long runway for take off. These things make He-162 totally unusable in the role of cheap 'folksjeager' fighter for which it was produced.

brady · « **Reply #50 on:** July 11, 2001, 06:19:00 PM »

aper:

Please read above Capt. Eric Brown would disagree with u i think.

SOB · « **Reply #51 on:** July 11, 2001, 07:52:00 PM »

There we have it folks. Brady wins the award for most belated responce on the BB to date!

brady · « **Reply #52 on:** July 11, 2001, 09:53:00 PM »

All good things in time......

]http://content.communities.msn.com/isapi/fetch.dll?action=MyPhotos_GetPubPhoto&photoId=nHwD6d60JNIFs2mHfM9ggHF4xY6Gy1uBBOIL0vAzWuZ4VQ!pBhaoFjvmZM4qCFICQ[/img][/url]

john9001 · « **Reply #53 on:** July 12, 2001, 10:47:00 AM »

the P51H is going to be added just to pissoff the luffwhiners

Staga · « **Reply #54 on:** July 12, 2001, 11:48:00 AM »

From FlightJournal:

"With a top speed of 487mph in a clean configuration, the P-51H was the fastest propeller-driven aircraft produced during World War II. However, production was so late that the war ended before any of these hot-rod Mustangs saw combat service."

IMHO if it saw fights then its welcome; If not forget it.

brady · « **Reply #55 on:** July 12, 2001, 12:04:00 PM »

Yes I agree if it did not see combat then it should not be in AH.

mx22 · « **Reply #56 on:** July 12, 2001, 12:12:00 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by brady:
Yes I agree if it did not see combat then it should not be in AH.

Congratulations, spoken like a true luftwhiner! Actually same goes to Staga. 51H has as much right to be in the arena, as the badly tested and hurriedly put in production 162.

mx22

brady · « **Reply #57 on:** July 12, 2001, 12:48:00 PM »

I am NOT a luftwabbie, I think we have enough german stuff for now aside from some aramement stuff for the JU 88 and FW 190 F8, I just think if HTC is going to do a jet fighter the He 162 should be considered.

The line neads to be drawn somewhear and the wheather or not it saw combat should be the line I think. IMO we nead more Japanese, Rushian and Itilian stuff heck even some British planes like the Mossie or Beaufighter before we get more German or US stuff.

Staga · « **Reply #58 on:** July 12, 2001, 01:08:00 PM »

mx22 I rather fly P-51D than Me-109 and now you tell me I'm "Luftwhiener".
Are you stupid or something ?

Issue is there really should be a line which plane had a right to be in plane and which not.
Me-262 saw action (a lot of it btw)= model it.
P-51H did not see any action= forget it.
He-162 saw limited action= model or not, I dont care.

Now go play with your toys.

AKSWulfe · « **Reply #59 on:** July 12, 2001, 01:16:00 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Staga:
Are you stupid or something ?

Grow up Staga!
-SW