Author Topic: He-162 It did See Combat!,Possable Perk? (Read 1549 times)

Staga · « **Reply #60 on:** July 12, 2001, 01:22:00 PM »

Just asking a innocent question

AKSWulfe · « **Reply #61 on:** July 12, 2001, 01:24:00 PM »

Just pokin' fun atcha!

I would like to see the He-162, never played it in anything other than SWOTL.

P-51H.. no thanks.
-SW

mx22 · « **Reply #62 on:** July 12, 2001, 02:58:00 PM »

Seeing you guys being so afraid of the 51H makes me wanna fly it.

Staga, before I answer your question, I have to know if you are smart enough to understand my answer. Until then I rest.

mx22

Staga · « **Reply #63 on:** July 12, 2001, 05:08:00 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by mx22:

Congratulations, spoken like a true luftwhiner! Actually same goes to Staga.

You were already talking without better knowledge so please continue

Karnak · « **Reply #64 on:** July 12, 2001, 06:24:00 PM »

Staga,

The problem with using "action" is that different people have differing opinions on what constitutes "action" and that it favors certain countries that were completely covered by enemy air action. Some say the Meteor did see action, some say that it did not. I wonder what the pilots of the Meteor think?

Using production numbers is the same thing, it unfairly favors nations that did not have their production capabilities pulverized and over-run by the enemy.

In my opinion, the only fair, linear, system is to judge by whether there where any production models produced before Japan surrendered. Thus:

6 Prototype Airframes = Do Not Add
7,856 Production Airframes = Add
1 Production Airframe = Add
2 Mock-Up Airframes = Do Not Add

That said, I would much rather have a 1943 arena than the 1944/45 arena we are heading for.

brady · « **Reply #65 on:** November 19, 2002, 08:52:06 PM »

Pongo · « **Reply #66 on:** November 19, 2002, 10:08:08 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Karnak
Staga,

The problem with using "action" is that different people have differing opinions on what constitutes "action" and that it favors certain countries that were completely covered by enemy air action. Some say the Meteor did see action, some say that it did not. I wonder what the pilots of the Meteor think?

Using production numbers is the same thing, it unfairly favors nations that did not have their production capabilities pulverized and over-run by the enemy.

In my opinion, the only fair, linear, system is to judge by whether there where any production models produced before Japan surrendered. Thus:

6 Prototype Airframes = Do Not Add
7,856 Production Airframes = Add
1 Production Airframe = Add
2 Mock-Up Airframes = Do Not Add

That said, I would much rather have a 1943 arena than the 1944/45 arena we are heading for.

what about 15 pre production airframes...

Kweassa · « **Reply #67 on:** November 19, 2002, 11:32:15 PM »

The moment we get a P-51H. I'm gonna throw a campaign for the Go-229. Since that lil' line of certain limits in historicity is crossed, then no reason why another line cannot be crossed.

brady · « **Reply #68 on:** November 20, 2002, 12:09:47 AM »

What next inflight porn, the Humanity....

whgates3 · « **Reply #69 on:** November 20, 2002, 12:37:17 AM »

http://www.acefury.com/
it'd be a hilarious game if they give the FMs all the real faults they had...& if you look at the video, why the fu>if they wanted something cool they should have tried this

hyena426 · « **Reply #70 on:** November 20, 2002, 01:00:30 AM »

that plane allways cracked me up,,looks like its strait from buck rogers design book,,lol

whgates3 · « **Reply #71 on:** November 20, 2002, 02:17:27 AM »

a staggeringly cool plane in both looks and performance - 360 MPH in from 180 HP engine in 1940

hyena426 · « **Reply #72 on:** November 20, 2002, 01:59:12 PM »

wow,,that is very impressive for 180 horses!! could you imagine over 1,000 in it?,,hehahe

davidpt40 · « **Reply #73 on:** November 20, 2002, 07:58:26 PM »

The U.S. had many planes ready to fight and kill near the end of the war. Should the U.S. be penalized and not have these planes in AH? The Bearcat and Tigercat were both enroute to the Pacific when the 2nd atomic bomb was dropped. I'm sure the P51H was in a similar situation.

If the plane was in a combat unit at the end of the war, then it should be modeled and perked.

illo · « **Reply #74 on:** November 25, 2002, 01:31:03 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Westy
"The P51H will be here and it saw NO combat"

Sucks don't it?? lol Ahh. P-51H. Can't wait! F8F, can't wait! P-47 M is to die for! Mmmmhmm. You guessed it. Can't wait again!

They were deployed and weren't needed. That says it all

-Westy

[This message has been edited by Westy (edited 12-21-2000).]

I think this really sucks since we miss many models that were actually important in war and were operated in hundeths.

I would like to see planes like FW 190A-6, FW 190A-2 ,FW 190A-9, Bf 109E-1, BF 109f-2, Ju 52, He 177, He 111, Bristol Blenheim, F2a-1, F2a-3, Fiat G.50, Bristol Bulldog, Gloster Gladiator, Dewoitine 520, I-15, I-153, SB-2, LaGG-3, Yak-1, Yak-3, I-16, Curtiss Hawk, Ki-27, Pe-2, P-39D, P-39Q and so on.

I cant see why we need more dick extension superplanes which were never operational. Maybe there are people in need to boost their ego and HTC makes good profit of it.

Happy running.