Author Topic: B-26  (Read 1167 times)

Offline Cajunn

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 723
Re: B-26
« Reply #15 on: April 29, 2009, 12:46:40 AM »
Yep I agree, also the Yaks and P-40's could use some attention.
“The important thing [in tactics] is to suppress the enemy's useful actions but allow his useless actions. However, doing this alone is defensive.”

Miyamoto Musashi (1584-1645)
Japanese Samurai & Philosopher

Offline frank3

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9352
Re: B-26
« Reply #16 on: April 29, 2009, 05:33:09 AM »
Quote
Development Update october 28,2008 What this all means for now is that we are going to focus on core game development.  Were going to pull the CT AI mission system and redevelop it for use by CMs in scenarios and special events.  Were working on new terrain upgrades in both the technology and the art used.  We want to implement a character animation system.  We want to bring back the old 8 player H2H but expand it both in the number of players and with additional gameplay capabilities.  Theres a lot of systems in the game engine that are dated and in need of overhaul.

Yay we're getting the H2H back with MORE players!
Who cares for animated pilots now :D

Offline stephen

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 744
Re: B-26
« Reply #17 on: April 29, 2009, 05:40:01 AM »
and the nose wheel falls through the concrete under braking....
Spell checker is for Morrons

Offline LLogann

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4947
      • Candidz.com
Re: B-26
« Reply #18 on: April 29, 2009, 07:31:13 AM »
It's true, it's true!!!  And mine is going to be smoking a cigar.... Like Capt. WildBill Kelso
animated pilots ? yah right.

See Rule #4
Now I only pay because of my friends.

Offline Noir

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5964
Re: B-26
« Reply #19 on: April 30, 2009, 04:13:18 AM »
getting the invulnerable tail gunner fixed would be good too.

I was asking myself, what makes a B26 near invulnerable in AH2 compared to P47 for example ?
now posting as SirNuke

Offline lyric1

  • Skinner Team
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10687
Re: B-26
« Reply #20 on: April 30, 2009, 06:50:20 AM »
getting the invulnerable tail gunner fixed would be good too.

I was asking myself, what makes a B26 near invulnerable in AH2 compared to P47 for example ?
I always thought the plane was a little to tough for AHII until I found this picture. The story as I recall it the plane dropped it's load on target & made it home.


Offline Noir

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5964
Re: B-26
« Reply #21 on: April 30, 2009, 07:24:25 AM »
pretty amazing when you consider the lifting surface % lost. I still believe that the real one couldn't take hundreds of 20mm shells explosion like ours do. The argument stands for all bombers, I don't know why bombers in AHII are a whole different league when it come to taking hits.

I just wish that the damage model had more hit zones so it would be more realistic, and not just the old "wing is on, wing is off" binary thing for example. I know its not a simple wish.
« Last Edit: April 30, 2009, 08:46:01 AM by Noir »
now posting as SirNuke

Offline thndregg

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4053
Re: B-26
« Reply #22 on: April 30, 2009, 07:40:28 AM »
I often question the damage accuracy of the B26 myself. I use them exclusively to level bomb carriers from 8K, just out of reach of the auto-ack, but still within easy range of 5-inchers. More times than not, I survive entact unless a player nails my bombers with the 5-inch.
Former XO: Birds of Prey (BOPs - AH2)
Former CO: 91st Bomb Group (H)
Current Assignment: Dickweed Heavy Bomber Group

Offline Swatch

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 203
      • http://groups.yahoo.com/groups/rtcircus
Re: B-26
« Reply #23 on: April 30, 2009, 09:13:05 AM »
I love my B-26s for this reason... I'm not sure where they're supposed to be on the damage absorbtion scale, but I have noticed they take a fair amount of damage.  That bein said, if it really is not historic, I'm not against correcting it (but I will shed a tear if they do :( )
OFFICIALLY AN AEROSPACE ENGINEER AS OF 1PM JUNE 13th!  Goodbye UC, you've been hell.

Proud member of the 364th CHawks, 383rd BG, formerly the RTC.

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: B-26
« Reply #24 on: April 30, 2009, 11:29:53 AM »
B26s have one of the worst damage models of the bomber set. One of the earliest, buggiest bomber models. I want it remodeled if ONLY to reconstruct the damage model to accurately RECEIVE damage.

I've put 1/2 an entire C-hog loadout (that's HISPANOS, folks!) into a set of B26s flying level. Only thing I got was a gas leak, lost an elevator on a drone, and maybe a flap on the lead.

I've put multiple 30mm sprites in the same spot onto these birds, flying K4s and G14s. I've landed 2 hit sprites directly on the V-stab of one before and it took no damage (not even rudder damage).

Second only to the damned lancasters.


Then again, the B25Cs (which have new damage models) still show some of the same BS titanium-plated defenses. I have film of a P39Q firing MULTIPLE 37mm hits into B25Cs with little effect, Fw190A8s with 4x 20mm landing dozens of hits per burst, in 3+ passes on the same bomber, only getting a fire on the very last pass (after firing 400 20mm rounds). I'd love to see those fixed as well.

Offline oakranger

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8380
      • http://www.slybirds.com/
Re: B-26
« Reply #25 on: April 30, 2009, 04:18:23 PM »
They should make one of the B-26B 10 through 55.
Oaktree

56th Fighter group

Offline E25280

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3475
      • http://125thspartanforums.com
Re: B-26
« Reply #26 on: April 30, 2009, 09:11:17 PM »
I was asking myself, what makes a B26 near invulnerable in AH2 compared to P47 for example ?

Just a guess -- probably because the B-26 is a much larger aircraft.

B-26:
Wingspan 65'
Length 56'
height 17'10"
Empty weight 24000 lbs.

P-47N:
Wingspan 40'9"
Length 36'1"
Height 14'8"
Empty weight 10000 lbs.

The B-26 and B-25 were both very rugged aircraft.  If you think you can take either down as easily as a fighter, the error is in your expectation, not the modeling.
Brauno in a past life, followed by LTARget
SWtarget in current incarnation
Captain and Communications Officer~125th Spartans

"Proudly drawing fire so that my brothers may pass unharmed."

Offline Noir

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5964
Re: B-26
« Reply #27 on: May 01, 2009, 12:28:33 AM »
regardless of the size the planes are made of the same materials with comparable construction principles, I agree that the bombers should be more rugged, but the difference in AH is like night and day. 3x20mm hits will take a P47 wing, put 60 rounds in the B26 wing and its still flying !
now posting as SirNuke