Author Topic: Manual Calibration  (Read 936 times)

Offline CountD90

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 375
Manual Calibration
« on: May 12, 2009, 07:43:15 PM »
How about adding manual calibration back into the game. Not the kind that was in the game before where you had to had the cross hair over a certain point, I mean adding in a series of commands that allows us to set a certain alt and speed for bombing. I think it would help out with some of the easy mode of level bombing will adding to immersion of the game.

Count
GameID:Count
The Misfit Toys
Quote from: Wreked
If you are feeling a little useless, offended, or depressed, just remember that you were once the fastest and most victorious little sperm out of millions.

Offline 5PointOh

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2842
Re: Manual Calibration
« Reply #1 on: May 12, 2009, 11:16:50 PM »
+1 :aok :aok
Coprhead
Wings of Terror
Mossie Student Driver

Offline Swatch

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 203
      • http://groups.yahoo.com/groups/rtcircus
Re: Manual Calibration
« Reply #2 on: May 13, 2009, 12:45:40 AM »
As a bomber pilot I'm torn on this...

Advantages:  Somewhat more realistic in terms of going through the motions.

Disadvantages:  Laser bomb sight becomes even more accurate because of existence of E6B.  Can literally dial in your numbers... 


I think the ideal method here would be dial in your numbers using dot commands or joystick inputs (similar to naval gunning), but a less accurate E6B (perhaps to the nearest 5 knts/mph.   This of course will not happen.
OFFICIALLY AN AEROSPACE ENGINEER AS OF 1PM JUNE 13th!  Goodbye UC, you've been hell.

Proud member of the 364th CHawks, 383rd BG, formerly the RTC.

Offline MachFly

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6296
Re: Manual Calibration
« Reply #3 on: May 13, 2009, 01:34:13 AM »
 :aok
"Now, if I had to make the choice of one fighter aircraft above all the others...it would be, without any doubt, the world's greatest propeller driven flying machine - the magnificent and immortal Spitfire."
Lt. Col. William R. Dunn
flew Spitfires, Hurricanes, P-51s, P-47s, and F-4s

Offline Strip

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3319
Re: Manual Calibration
« Reply #4 on: May 13, 2009, 11:08:14 AM »
With E6B you can still dial in your numbers as it stands right now.

Take your pick.....either throttle or keyboard.

Offline AWwrgwy

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5478
Re: Manual Calibration
« Reply #5 on: May 13, 2009, 11:13:25 AM »
Quote
The Norden itself was used to make a direct measurement of the groundspeed. During the final approach to target the bombardier would select an easily visible test target and turn the bombsight on with its default settings. Since the aircraft had no information about the windspeed, the test target would drift across the eyepiece as the aircraft moved away from the calculated point. The bombardier then adjusted the sight using a separate set of fine-tuning dials that could be operated by feel while looking through the eyepiece, using them to adjust the drift rates until the target stopped moving in the eyepiece. The dials then held an accurate measurement of windspeed, which could be used for the rest of the bomb run. This was a much more accurate measurement than could be provided by the navigator's drift telescope or dead reckoning

Sounds almost like our manual calibration, doesn't it?


wrongway
71 (Eagle) Squadron
"THAT"S PAINT!!"

"If nothing else works, a total pig-headed unwillingness to look facts in the face will see us through."
- General Sir Anthony Cecil Hogmanay

Offline Strip

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3319
Re: Manual Calibration
« Reply #6 on: May 13, 2009, 01:03:13 PM »
Did norden correct for crosswinds?

Offline Plazus

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2868
Re: Manual Calibration
« Reply #7 on: May 13, 2009, 01:24:19 PM »
Did norden correct for crosswinds?

Yes, I believe so. It also calculated atmospheric pressure as well as crosswinds. I think the Norden bombsight was used in the B29.
Plazus
80th FS "Headhunters"

Axis vs Allies

Offline Motherland

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8110
Re: Manual Calibration
« Reply #8 on: May 13, 2009, 03:00:39 PM »
As a bomber pilot I'm torn on this...

Advantages:  Somewhat more realistic in terms of going through the motions.

Disadvantages:  Laser bomb sight becomes even more accurate because of existence of E6B.  Can literally dial in your numbers... 


I think the ideal method here would be dial in your numbers using dot commands or joystick inputs (similar to naval gunning), but a less accurate E6B (perhaps to the nearest 5 knts/mph.   This of course will not happen.
You don't plug in the numbers using the old manual calibration method. You track a point in the environment using your joystick.


Offline Swatch

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 203
      • http://groups.yahoo.com/groups/rtcircus
Re: Manual Calibration
« Reply #9 on: May 13, 2009, 05:39:32 PM »
Motherland I'm aware of that... I was responding to his suggestion to make it with plug and chug numbers...

How about adding manual calibration back into the game. Not the kind that was in the game before where you had to had the cross hair over a certain point, I mean adding in a series of commands that allows us to set a certain alt and speed for bombing. I think it would help out with some of the easy mode of level bombing will adding to immersion of the game.

Count

I actually wouldn't mind having the old joystick manual calibration...I think it would be more fun.
OFFICIALLY AN AEROSPACE ENGINEER AS OF 1PM JUNE 13th!  Goodbye UC, you've been hell.

Proud member of the 364th CHawks, 383rd BG, formerly the RTC.

Offline CountD90

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 375
Re: Manual Calibration
« Reply #10 on: May 13, 2009, 06:37:01 PM »
I actually wouldn't mind having the old joystick manual calibration...I think it would be more fun.

Yea but I believe I read somewhere on the forums that the reason HT took it out is because it wouldn't be fair for the people who had lesser quality joysticks that weren't as precise as others. Many not have been his exact words but I was something alone that extent. The reason I think my idea would fit in, is because it has nothing to do with your joystick.
GameID:Count
The Misfit Toys
Quote from: Wreked
If you are feeling a little useless, offended, or depressed, just remember that you were once the fastest and most victorious little sperm out of millions.

Offline Motherland

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8110
Re: Manual Calibration
« Reply #11 on: May 13, 2009, 06:43:00 PM »
Motherland I'm aware of that... I was responding to his suggestion to make it with plug and chug numbers...
Sorry, misunderstood.

Offline Cajunn

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 723
Re: Manual Calibration
« Reply #12 on: May 13, 2009, 07:30:22 PM »
You think they dive bomb Lanc's, 24's, 26's and 17's now......make it harder to bomb and they will just dive to the target since there isn't anything to spend the bomber perks on anyway.  ;)
“The important thing [in tactics] is to suppress the enemy's useful actions but allow his useless actions. However, doing this alone is defensive.”

Miyamoto Musashi (1584-1645)
Japanese Samurai & Philosopher

Offline CountD90

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 375
Re: Manual Calibration
« Reply #13 on: May 14, 2009, 04:33:38 AM »
You think they dive bomb Lanc's, 24's, 26's and 17's now......make it harder to bomb and they will just dive to the target since there isn't anything to spend the bomber perks on anyway.  ;)

The idea isn't really to make it harder just add more to it, if you think about it once you get good at calibrating you will be able to do it quicker than holding down the Y key for 12 seconds. Besides the dive bombing heavy dweebs will always be there. That has nothing to do with the bombsites, it has to do with easily hitting GVs with a heavy bomber.
GameID:Count
The Misfit Toys
Quote from: Wreked
If you are feeling a little useless, offended, or depressed, just remember that you were once the fastest and most victorious little sperm out of millions.

Offline SmokinLoon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6168
Re: Manual Calibration
« Reply #14 on: May 14, 2009, 06:26:09 AM »
IMO... bombing is far too easy and the "carpet bombing" effect is almost nil.  In WWII, the bombers were not able to be as precise as we are now and hence the use of massed amounts of ord over a target "area" from teh large bombers vs the massed amount of ord on a single hanger as we do now.

If manual calibration forces us to use the bombers in a more historical manner (carpet bombing) for the desired effect... then go for it.
Proud grandson of the late Lt. Col. Darrell M. "Bud" Gray, USAF (ret.), B24D pilot, 5th BG/72nd BS. 28 combat missions within the "slot", PTO.