Author Topic: Aircraft Errors  (Read 1180 times)

Offline PG monster

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 14
      • http://wio.boom.ru
Aircraft Errors
« on: May 03, 2001, 04:30:00 AM »
Aircraft Errors

  the Lavochkin error: Historically, all the La-5 and La-7 versions could carry a pair of 100kg bombs. In AH, the Lavochkin
                                      fighters can't carry any load.

         the MC.202 error: Historically, all MC.202 could carry 320kg of bombs. In AH, it can't carry any load.

    the A6M5 error: In AH, the Zero has not "attack" configuration, but can carry bombs, even 250kg as kamikadze did.

------------------
<url>http://wio.newmail.ru</url>

Offline juzz

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 193
      • http://nope.haha.com
Aircraft Errors
« Reply #1 on: May 03, 2001, 07:55:00 AM »
To save time...

Ju 88A-4 had 1,000kg bombs, 20mm cannon etc - and couldn't carry bombs and torpedoes.
Fw 190A-8 had tons more stuff...
B-26B, B-17G and P-38L had 2,000lb bombs
P-47D-30 could NOT carry 3,400 rounds of .50in ammo, 10x5in rockets and 2,500lbs of bombs!(D-25 similarly so)
Spitfire VC had 2x250lb bombs and slipper tanks of 30 and 90 gallon size.

Offline hazed-

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2467
      • http://combatarena.users.btopenworld.com
Aircraft Errors
« Reply #2 on: May 03, 2001, 10:25:00 AM »
(juzz the spitfireVC also had 4x20mm hispanos)
Ju88a4 bombload is 4409lb (2000kg) in books i have but may be wrong
macci 205v later versions had 20mm in wings instead of 7.7mm is ours the 205 veltro?
p51- had 2x1000lbs "or" 6x5in rockets
B26- anyone got a picture of the b26 with waste guns? mine dont show them.

------------------
Hazed
3./JG2

[This message has been edited by hazed- (edited 05-03-2001).]

Offline flakbait

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 867
      • http://www.worldaccessnet.com/~delta6
Aircraft Errors
« Reply #3 on: May 03, 2001, 01:12:00 PM »
Hazed, our C.205 does have 20mm cannons in the wings. The C.202 started out with only a pair of 12.7mm MGs in the nose, later they added the 7.7mm MGs in the wings. One production run (no idea how many) had 20mm cannons in a gondola attachment ala Bf-109. The variants I've got listed are:

C.202: stock plane
C.202CB: fighter-bomber, provision for underwing bombs or droptanks. 705 lbs max load.
C.202AS: tropicalized variant


-----------------------
Flakbait [Delta6]
Delta Six's Flight School
Put the P-61B in Aces High
"With all due respect Chaplian, I don't think God wants to hear from me right now.
I'm gonna go out there and remove one of His creations from this universe.
And when I get back I'm gonna drink a bottle of Scotch like it was Chiggy von
Richthofen's blood and celebrate his death."
Col. McQueen, Space: Above and Beyond

 

Offline gatt

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2441
Aircraft Errors
« Reply #4 on: May 03, 2001, 05:14:00 PM »
Even if they added 2x7,7mm in the wings in later variants of the C.202, most pilots still removed them for better manoverability.
In RL 2x12,7mm were enuff to down Hurricanes, Spitfire MkV and light bombers.

Only 1 C.202 prototype had 2x20mm wing gondolas but was her performance was terrible, so tests were discontinued.

About 100 C.205 "Veltro" Ist Series had 2x12,7mm and 2x7,7mm in the wings. About 160 IIIrd Series had 2x12,7mm and 2x20mm in the wings. There was no IInd Series .

<S>

[This message has been edited by gatt (edited 05-04-2001).]
"And one of the finest aircraft I ever flew was the Macchi C.205. Oh, beautiful. And here you had the perfect combination of italian styling and german engineering .... it really was a delight to fly ... and we did tests on it and were most impressed." - Captain Eric Brown

Offline Tac

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4085
Aircraft Errors
« Reply #5 on: May 03, 2001, 05:23:00 PM »
P-38L could take TWO 2k bombs and 14 rockets too. *grin*    

Offline juzz

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 193
      • http://nope.haha.com
Aircraft Errors
« Reply #6 on: May 03, 2001, 07:57:00 PM »
One book I've seen claims nearly 8,000lbs as the maximum bombload for the Ju 88A-4.  

B-26B did have waist guns from the B-4 production block onward. The one in AH is a B-26B-25.

Offline Fishu

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3789
Aircraft Errors
« Reply #7 on: May 03, 2001, 08:32:00 PM »
Well, Ju-88 A-4 surely takes more bombs than just 2000kg.
It can take either 2x1000kg or 4x500kg (also mixed load of 500/250kg and 4x250kg, but 1000kg bombs were too big to fit more bombs) and then also fit some into the bombbay, so that would be fairly much over it.
(Perhaps those values were for external ordnance?)

I don't have books for accurate values right now (other than the internet sites) and those which I've read, are in the library... and of course those are closed at almost 4.40am.
(*figures* if those aren't borrowd already)

Offline Fatty

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3885
      • http://www.fatdrunkbastards.com
Aircraft Errors
« Reply #8 on: May 03, 2001, 08:52:00 PM »
Gatt, how many of the fighter-bomber version were produced?

Let me put bombs on a 202 and I'll have a new favorite osti-killer  

Offline R4M

  • Parolee
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 662
Aircraft Errors
« Reply #9 on: May 03, 2001, 08:57:00 PM »
 
Quote
Originally posted by hazed-:
p51- had 2x1000lbs "or" 6x5in rockets

Similar problem with the P47Ds. Their wing load options are pure fiction  

Ju88 is missing teh 1000kg and 2000kg bombs (fishu I think hat the SC2000 could also be carried in the wing rack of the Ju88). The 20mm frontal cannon, AND (MOST importantly IMHO), the flexible-mounted 13mm heavy MG instead of the peashooters.

Fw190A8 and F8 miss the 1000kg bomb for central rack

Fw190A8 lacks the option to load wing gondolas with four MG151/20 cannons.

Fw190F8 lacks rockets, Drop tank, and 250kg bomb options for the wings.

Fw190A5 lacks the U3 long range Jabo option to remove MGs and outter cannon and carry wing DTs or 250Kg bombs.

Fw190A and Bf109 AA rockets time fuzed is WAY off.

All Fw190s should have the option to remove the cowl MGs   .

Me109G6/G10 lack the 3xmk108 30mm option.

Well I could say more but I think its more than enough for now  

[This message has been edited by R4M (edited 05-03-2001).]

Offline gatt

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2441
Aircraft Errors
« Reply #10 on: May 04, 2001, 02:13:00 AM »
Fatty,
AFAIK very few C.202 were used as fighter-bomber. C.202 and C.205 were mainly used as escort and interceptors. CR-42, C.200, Re.2000 and Ju87 were used for A/G attacks. BTW, many books say she could carry up to 320Kg of bombs ....  
"And one of the finest aircraft I ever flew was the Macchi C.205. Oh, beautiful. And here you had the perfect combination of italian styling and german engineering .... it really was a delight to fly ... and we did tests on it and were most impressed." - Captain Eric Brown

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Aircraft Errors
« Reply #11 on: May 04, 2001, 02:18:00 AM »
My info says that the C.202, and by extension the C.205, could carry "two bombs up to 353lb (160kg) or tanks."

------------------
We few, we happy few, we band of brothers;
For he to-day that sheds his blood with me
Shall be my brother

Bring the Mosquito FB.MkVI Series 2 to Aces High!!!

Sisu
-Karnak
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline SFRT - Frenchy

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5420
      • http://home.CFL.rr.com/rauns/menu.htm
Aircraft Errors
« Reply #12 on: May 04, 2001, 09:51:00 AM »
Juzz, Ram, some more allied propaganda :

           
           
           


[This message has been edited by SFRT - Frenchy (edited 05-04-2001).]
Dat jugs bro.

Terror flieger since 1941.
------------------------

VISCONTI

  • Guest
Aircraft Errors
« Reply #13 on: May 04, 2001, 11:36:00 AM »

Offline gatt

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2441
Aircraft Errors
« Reply #14 on: May 05, 2001, 05:57:00 AM »
Visc, nice pic! Who knows, eventually PYRO could have some pity for us Macchi flyers  
"And one of the finest aircraft I ever flew was the Macchi C.205. Oh, beautiful. And here you had the perfect combination of italian styling and german engineering .... it really was a delight to fly ... and we did tests on it and were most impressed." - Captain Eric Brown