Author Topic: Mcnamara  (Read 1024 times)

Offline JB88

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10980
Mcnamara
« on: July 06, 2009, 05:29:53 PM »
sort of surprised that noone has posted about his passing.

certainly a character worth noting.

thoughts?

this thread is doomed.
www.augustbach.com  

To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield. -Ulysses.

word.

Offline sirvlad

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 410
Re: Mcnamara
« Reply #1 on: July 06, 2009, 05:41:24 PM »
who?  :huh

Offline JB88

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10980
Re: Mcnamara
« Reply #2 on: July 06, 2009, 05:44:46 PM »
who?  :huh

uhhhh....

robert mcnamara.  secretary of defense to kennedy and johnson.

architect of the vietnam war.

hello?

this thread is doomed.
www.augustbach.com  

To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield. -Ulysses.

word.

Offline Motherland

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8110
Re: Mcnamara
« Reply #3 on: July 06, 2009, 05:47:20 PM »
I hadn't seen anywhere that he had died. Weird.

Offline JB88

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10980
Re: Mcnamara
« Reply #4 on: July 06, 2009, 05:55:26 PM »
yep.  93 years old.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8136595.stm

it was headlining this morning, but got overwhelmed by the micheal jackson circus/debacle.



this thread is doomed.
www.augustbach.com  

To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield. -Ulysses.

word.

Offline eagl

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6769
Re: Mcnamara
« Reply #5 on: July 06, 2009, 06:42:57 PM »
This has an interesting writeup.  The discussion of the Vietnam war is completely one-sided, but it mirrors McNamara's viewpoint.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/07/us/07mcnamara.html?_r=2&pagewanted=1&hp

He brought an analytical approach to everything in the DoD at a time where the inmates were running the asylum.  In my opinion he was in large part responsible for the current highly disciplined state of the military where civilian control of all things military is absolutely not questioned.  That may be debatable since the military had a strong tradition of civilian control before he took over managing the military, but he really changed almost everything about how the military was run as far as ensuring every dollar spent was the result of at least an attempt at rigorous analysis of costs, benefits, and requirements that could be stated more clearly than "yea we outta have some of dat".
Everyone I know, goes away, in the end.

Offline Die Hard

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2205
Re: Mcnamara
« Reply #6 on: July 06, 2009, 07:10:10 PM »
I know a couple of guys that would like to take a leak on his grave, but I'm not one of them.

<S> Robert McNamara.
It is better to be violent, if there is violence in our hearts, than to put on the cloak of nonviolence to cover impotence.

-Gandhi

Offline bj229r

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6735
Re: Mcnamara
« Reply #7 on: July 06, 2009, 07:50:33 PM »
People like him were the ones who ordered SAM sites 'under construction' to be off limits to F105's as they flew over them every day on the way to the useless targets that Mcnamara and his ilk in DC had picked to bomb that day....People like him were the ones that ordered certain areas off limits to overflight (they wanted to fight a 'nice' war) so that a real target NEAR one of afore-mentioned areas had VERY few routes of ingress and egress, sealing the fates of many pilots, and the NVA couldn't believe their luck at having such idiots running the war on the other side
Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large numbers

http://www.flamewarriors.net/forum/

Offline Die Hard

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2205
Re: Mcnamara
« Reply #8 on: July 07, 2009, 07:37:50 AM »
It's more complicated than that though. McNamara wasn't trying to defeat the North Vietnamese, only protect the South. Trying to defeat the North would inevitably have drawn the Chinese and Russians directly into the conflict, and the South simply wasn't worth starting WWIII over. Many mistakes were made and decisions that with hindsight seem idiotic, but that's no different that any other war. It was a lose-lose situation where losing the war meant giving in to communism and winning meant quite possibly starting WWIII. So the only viable alternative was enforcing a stalemate, but with the peace movement back home and diminishing public support, America was not up to the task of enduring such a stalemate. So in the end we gave in to communism.
« Last Edit: July 07, 2009, 07:46:35 AM by Die Hard »
It is better to be violent, if there is violence in our hearts, than to put on the cloak of nonviolence to cover impotence.

-Gandhi

Offline 33Vortex

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4754
      • Dirac's equation (non truncated)
Re: Mcnamara
« Reply #9 on: July 07, 2009, 10:19:32 AM »
I think you should watch his film 'Fog of War'. He certainly made a lot of mistakes, and are admitting that in the film without going into specifics, but he tried to do what he believed was right. Gotta give him credit for that.

GameID: Turner
Truth has no agenda.

Offline Wolfala

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4875
Re: Mcnamara
« Reply #10 on: July 07, 2009, 10:26:06 AM »
That is a haunted man. Hope he finds peace.


the best cure for "wife ack" is to deploy chaff:    $...$$....$....$$$.....$ .....$$$.....$ ....$$

Offline Stoney

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3482
Re: Mcnamara
« Reply #11 on: July 07, 2009, 10:33:29 AM »
People like him were the ones who ordered SAM sites 'under construction' to be off limits to F105's as they flew over them every day on the way to the useless targets that Mcnamara and his ilk in DC had picked to bomb that day....People like him were the ones that ordered certain areas off limits to overflight (they wanted to fight a 'nice' war) so that a real target NEAR one of afore-mentioned areas had VERY few routes of ingress and egress, sealing the fates of many pilots, and the NVA couldn't believe their luck at having such idiots running the war on the other side

As much as I detest his management of the war and the concept of his "100,000" program, this isn't true.  The selectivity of targets was a political one that resulted from Johnson's meddling.  McNamara was merely responsible for passing those orders along.  Don't forget that he was one of the USAAF targeting gurus during WWII that designated 8th AF's daily bombing targets.  The man knew everything there was to know about strategic bombing as he had been one of those that crafted it during WWII.  

I think Eagle's observation may be most astute.  JFK appointed him purposefully to limit the power of guys like LeMay and the rest of the Chiefs whom JFK had grown to distrust.  Between his ability to minimize their influence going forward and his desire to apply analytical cost-benefit analyses for everything, he certainly ushered in a new era in the management of DoD and the role of Sec of Def.  I believe his impact is most evident in the actions of his successor, Donald Rumsfeld, who ran DoD both the first and second time in a similar manner, for better or worse.

Regardless, it is sad to see the passing of a brilliant man who obviously spent the remainder of his life after the war frustrated and bitter that he couldn't "fix" Vietnam or achieve the success that he had grown accustomed to.  Its apparent to me that he is a very good example for anyone who lets their ego take them to Washington D.C. instead of travelling there reluctantly, with humility and a sense of service.
"Can we be incorrect at times, absolutely, but I do believe 15 years of experience does deserve a little more credence and respect than you have given from your very first post."

HiTech

Offline Shuffler

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 27343
Re: Mcnamara
« Reply #12 on: July 07, 2009, 10:48:35 AM »
There are a lot of good men in the ground because they were sent into harms way with their hands tied. Anyone contributing to that does not warrant any respect in my book. Despite what they may have achieved earlier in life.
« Last Edit: July 07, 2009, 10:50:11 AM by Shuffler »
80th FS "Headhunters"

S.A.P.P.- Secret Association Of P-38 Pilots (Lightning In A Bottle)

Offline Die Hard

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2205
Re: Mcnamara
« Reply #13 on: July 07, 2009, 10:55:07 AM »
All soldiers are sent into harms way with their hands tied. It's just a question of how much rope is used.
It is better to be violent, if there is violence in our hearts, than to put on the cloak of nonviolence to cover impotence.

-Gandhi

Offline Patches1

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 668
Re: Mcnamara
« Reply #14 on: July 07, 2009, 11:24:50 AM »
See Rule #14
« Last Edit: July 07, 2009, 01:29:41 PM by Skuzzy »
"We're surrounded. That simplifies the problem."- Lewis B. "Chesty" Puller, General, USMC