Author Topic: Tankers talk (Long post)  (Read 4337 times)

Offline Jochen

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 188
      • http://www.jannousiainen.net
Tankers talk (Long post)
« Reply #45 on: August 04, 2000, 05:38:00 AM »
 
Quote
The next tank we do will most likely be the Easy 8 followed by a T-34/76, but I don't know when that will be as we'll have to put more work into the vehicle model before we can do more tanks.

Great news!

Few things that might need improving on vehicles:

- Own position for bow MG so that it can be aimed and fired independently.

- Vehicle bouncing should be random making hitting from move harder.

- Outside viev (F3) should be disabled, it makes ambushing enemy impossible.

- There should be way to end vehicle mission other than ditch, capture or death.

- Vehicles need own scoreing category.

------------------
jochen
Jagdflieger JG 2 'Richthofen' Aces High
Geschwaderkommodore (on leave) Jagdgeschwader 2 'Richthofen'  Warbirds

T-34/76 to Aces High!

Ladysmith wants you forthwith to come to her relief
Burn your briefs you leave for France tonight
Carefully cut the straps of the booby-traps and set the captives free
But don't shoot 'til you see her big blue eyes
jochen Gefechtsverband Kowalewski

Units: I. and II./KG 51, II. and III./KG 76, NSGr 1, NSGr 2, NSGr 20.
Planes: Do 17Z, Ju 87D, Ju 88A, He 111H, Ar 234A, Me 410A, Me 262A, Fw 190A, Fw 190F, Fw 190G.

Sieg oder bolsevismus!

Offline spora

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1
      • http://www.iki.fi/juhave/
Tankers talk (Long post)
« Reply #46 on: August 04, 2000, 07:26:00 PM »
 
Quote
Originally posted by fire_ant:

The number after the slash is the degrees of slope.  I’m not sure what the precise formula is for determining how slope effects penetration

There is none, especially since the armour & ammo quality varied.  Looking at the various frontal armour degree values in you post I wonder if there is a mix-up in the table.

There used to be two different methods of measuring the angles.  The one I'm more familiar with is the (continental?) european one - 0 degrees is flat horisontal, 90 degrees is vertical.  The other system has it reversed.

T-34 frontal armour is not 60 degrees, it is more like 40.  On the other hand, Sherman's frontal armour is quite steep (and high), almost 60 degrees.

So, figures from various sources cannot always be compared without checking them first.

Offline spora

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1
      • http://www.iki.fi/juhave/
Tankers talk (Long post)
« Reply #47 on: August 04, 2000, 07:29:00 PM »
T-26 - what is it?  In my vocabulary T-26 is a Soviet copy of an 1930's British Vickers 6 ton tank.

Ok, I've heard about an US late war T-26 tank, but it must have been a rare one?

fire_ant

  • Guest
Tankers talk (Long post)
« Reply #48 on: August 05, 2000, 01:03:00 AM »
 
Quote
Originally posted by spora:
T-26 - what is it?  In my vocabulary T-26 is a Soviet copy of an 1930's British Vickers 6 ton tank.

Ok, I've heard about an US late war T-26 tank, but it must have been a rare one?

It's the early designation of the first generation of the US Pershing tank, which appeared in small numbers in 1945 and saw limited combat.  It was armed with a 90mm gun, and based on the stats I have seen it was similar in performance and capabilities to the Tiger I, bka Pz VI., with roughly equivalent armor, speed, cross country mobility, and the gun performed about the same.

DB


Offline Pongo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6701
Tankers talk (Long post)
« Reply #49 on: August 08, 2000, 12:27:00 AM »
 
Quote
Originally posted by Pyro:
I don't think the M4 is a bad tank and I think it will be a useful tank in AH.  It has thicker armor on top than the Panzer IVH and better AA defense.  The next tank we do will most likely be the Easy 8 followed by a T-34/76, but I don't know when that will be as we'll have to put more work into the vehicle model before we can do more tanks.


Well I hope you change your mind and do the T34/85 instead. It is definatly the contemporary of the Easy 8. And one of the best looking tanks of the war.

Offline fdiron

  • Parolee
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 697
Tankers talk (Long post)
« Reply #50 on: August 09, 2000, 02:49:00 PM »
I saw on t.v. today where Israel used Sherman tanks during the 6 days war.  I think the best feature of the sherman tank was its good gas mileage and reliability.

Offline Pongo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6701
Tankers talk (Long post)
« Reply #51 on: August 09, 2000, 05:35:00 PM »
 
Quote
Originally posted by fdiron:
I saw on t.v. today where Israel used Sherman tanks during the 6 days war.  I think the best feature of the sherman tank was its good gas mileage and reliability.

The Shermans used by the isrealis in the 60s where mostly re armed with either
a French copy of the Panthers 75mm (m50)
or a 100 mm french smoothbore cannon....(m51)
Nice to have either in WW2...