Author Topic: naca testreports  (Read 787 times)

Offline niklas

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 418
naca testreports
« on: September 03, 2001, 09:09:00 AM »
i put up some pdf into the net from the naca. They tested a spit5A, Hurri2, Mossi. The tests are basically about flying characteristics, not turn times or climb rates.
Furthermore 2 reports about the naca test methods
you can download them from this directory:
 http://members.tripod.de/luftwaffe1/naca

niklas

Offline funkedup

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9466
      • http://www.raf303.org/
naca testreports
« Reply #1 on: September 03, 2001, 11:23:00 AM »
THX  :)

I just got Acrobat finally, and I'll try to put up some Wright Field stuff.   :)

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
naca testreports
« Reply #2 on: September 03, 2001, 02:10:00 PM »
Thank you.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline gripen

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1914
naca testreports
« Reply #3 on: September 03, 2001, 03:26:00 PM »
Danke Schön!

gripen

Offline niklas

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 418
naca testreports
« Reply #4 on: September 04, 2001, 09:02:00 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by funkedup:
THX   :)

I just got Acrobat finally, and I'll try to put up some Wright Field stuff.    :)

Iīm looking forward to read it  :)
I hope you have a good scan machine at work like me, because scanning 50 pages manually would be a lot of work... (it took me actually more time to remove the brackets from the reports than to scan it lol)
I recommend to scan them as tif (i used black and white and 200dpi), because this format can store multiple images in one file. You simply drag the multi-image tif-file on the acrobat icon and itīll be automatically converted

niklas

Offline F4UDOA

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1731
      • http://mywebpages.comcast.net/markw4/index.html
naca testreports
« Reply #5 on: September 04, 2001, 01:35:00 PM »
Errr,

Like what Funked??  :)   :D   :)

Offline funkedup

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9466
      • http://www.raf303.org/
naca testreports
« Reply #6 on: September 04, 2001, 01:49:00 PM »
I have copies of manuals that were developed by the Air Materiel Command for the captured Fw 190G, Me 262, and A6M2.  Snafu provided me with scans of Pilot's Notes for several RAF aircraft.  I also have a translation of a manual for the Fw 190A-8.

Offline HoHun

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2182
naca testreports
« Reply #7 on: September 04, 2001, 02:53:00 PM »
Hi Niklas,

thanks for the reports!

Here's what's puzzling me: The maximum lift coefficient for the Spitfire power on, gear up, flaps up, in a climb is given as 1.64 in report L-353 (if that's the ID), yet the maximum lift coefficient reached in a turn is given as 1.21 in turns and about 1.28 in pull-ups in L-354.

Do you have idea what's responsible for this difference? I'd have thought the higher value should also have been attainable in turns.

Regards,

Henning (HoHun)

Offline kraquen

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 49
naca testreports
« Reply #8 on: September 04, 2001, 03:01:00 PM »
i would think the angle of the wind hitting the wing would be the cause

Offline F4UDOA

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1731
      • http://mywebpages.comcast.net/markw4/index.html
naca testreports
« Reply #9 on: September 04, 2001, 03:11:00 PM »
Also some Max Cl's are listed with with prop wash and some without.

Funked,

Sounds great, can't wait to see them.

Offline wells

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 166
naca testreports
« Reply #10 on: September 04, 2001, 05:19:00 PM »
HoHun,

With the speed being higher in a turn, the propwash velocity is lower.

Offline niklas

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 418
naca testreports
« Reply #11 on: September 04, 2001, 06:03:00 PM »
"This value of maximum lift coefficient is closer to that reached fraom stalls in straight flight with power off than the value reached with power on because the slipstream effects in high speed turns are relatively small"  :)

Furthermore, they couldnīt do a stall test in a straight level fligth with power on (cruising). I think that they had to pull the aircraft up into a little zoom or climb to stall it for this condition. And a little climb or zoom immediatly reduce your stall speed a bit. But Cl is very senitive to the stall speed, itīs a function of v^2. This is maybe another reason why they reached very high Cl values for the power on condition. Iīve a report for a F2A-3 where they reached Clmax values higher than 3.0 with flaps down and high power settings... Iīm really wondering myself why they didnīt make a correction for the angle.

niklas

Offline butch2k

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 238
      • http://www.allaboutwarfare.com/forums
naca testreports
« Reply #12 on: September 05, 2001, 12:55:00 AM »
Niklas it seems that the link above does not work anymore, could you repost the reports or send them to me so that i could put them on an unlimited banwidth server ?

Offline Buzzbait

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1141
naca testreports
« Reply #13 on: September 05, 2001, 01:44:00 AM »
S! Niklas

I was very interested to see the reports but don't get the page.  Instead I get what looks like a German Lycos search page.  Could you repost the link?

              Thanks

Offline HoHun

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2182
naca testreports
« Reply #14 on: September 05, 2001, 02:29:00 AM »
Hi everyone,

thanks for the explanations!

I think I was mislead by the Spitfire's best climb speed which was in the same region as the speeds tested in turns and pullups - but of course it's achieved at a far lower cl, with the clmax being achieved only near the stall.

Regards,

Henning (HoHun)