OK Let me try this for the last and final time.
Here's an example of what I'm trying to get over.Lets use a military scenario as it'll probably be easier to relate to.
Young Private, officer etc walks into a new base, Somebody shouts out: "Hey I see from your patch that your from the fighting AH division, that's the bravest fighting unit in the world, let me buy you a beer as It's not often I get the chance to buy a brave person a beer"
Do you see the error in the persons thinking? The person accepts the common belief that because "AH division" is the bravest in the country and this private is from the "fighting AH division" and for the "AH" to perform bravely then the private must be brave. The characteristic of being brave is attributed to the part simply because it's membership of the whole This shows that the "somebody" would expect the same of any-and- therefore all-of the parts It's faulty because it's not necessary for every soldier to have acted bravely in order to justify the unit's label of "Bravest"
Hope this helps.
Tunes.
dude.....i think we're all saying the same thing. we're all just seeing different sides of the same scenario.
what(i intrepret)guppy as asking.......is this.
he posted here trying to acknowledge fun fights. there were. over four hours of it.
two members of your squad come in, and deface this thread......basically hijack it. not only that, but they place the sapp logo in their sig lines, trying to represent themselves as sapp members.
by being associated with them through that squad.....it brings your character into judgement. again, this is not an attack on you.
try this analogy. you and your family are in the siad yard, enjoying a cook-out......swimming, good food, etc. the neighborhood bully runs into your yard, knos\cks over the grills, and throws it into the pool, then egresses with great haste.
he comes to my house, and i do nothing. i don't let you in to set him straight.....because i'm friends with him....now,........what would you think of me at that point?
