I hear a lot of people saying things like the following;
-this aircraft has a higher power to weight ratio than that aircraft.. why can that aircraft outperform this one?
Optimization of propellers has a great impact in the thrust available at an airspeed for a plane. Some props for a given engine are optimized for high speed, and some for low speed. The propeller twist, diameter, pitch range, number of baldes and airfoil sections are all optimized for a certian range of flying. High speed props tend to be smaller diameter, and in order to absorb the power may need more blades. This keeps tip speeds below Mach 1, and also has lower "prop drag" than a large diameter prop. Low speed propellers have thicker airfoils, different twist distribution, and plan form.
Since all planes use constant speed props, if a plane is flying below the optimum speed for the diameter, airfoil section, number of blades, etc, it will be "slipping" a lot more than a blade that is optimized for that regime, and therefor wasting more power.
So a plane with a lower power to weight ratio, but is operating in a much more efficient regime for it's propeller design, it could outperform that other plane.
It all just boils down to understanding every detail about your aircraft's flight envelope, and optimizing your flight profile to fit the plane's strengths.
I'm sure that HTC can't model every detail about propeller propulsion efficiency... that program would probably cut FPS by 20% alone, but I'm sure they modeled quite a bit. Actually, it would be interesting to know how the propeller modeling is done, so that we could fly accordingly, but I'm sure they don't want to give everything away to the competition..
S!
CJ No. 272 Squadron