Author Topic: Japanese Navy  (Read 4227 times)

Offline FLS

  • AH Training Corps
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11617
      • Trainer's Website
Re: Japanese Navy
« Reply #75 on: September 28, 2009, 07:31:17 PM »
Sorry I was unclear. I meant as far as random spawning goes there would be a problem. If each side started with the same number of each type it wouldn't be a problem.

Maybe the Japanese fleet could have those little 2 man subs.   :noid

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Re: Japanese Navy
« Reply #76 on: September 29, 2009, 11:47:12 AM »
I'd once suggested that the Bishops have the fleet we have now, the Rooks get a British fleet and the Knights get a Japanese fleet.

That would cause some balance issues though, particularly for the Rooks as the British carriers may have been tough with armored flight decks, but they were much smaller than the Japanese and American fleet carriers so landing on them and taking off of them would be harder.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline RaptorL

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 292
Re: Japanese Navy
« Reply #77 on: October 08, 2009, 12:16:22 PM »
OK. Hears my new idea for the new CV groups. For each War arena, will have CV groups from those years spawn at a Port. These Ports will spawn a random group from a selection countries, model of that year, what class of ship (ex. destroyer, cruiser, battleship etc.), and the # of ships that will be in that CV group. This will affect the intensity of flack cover, targets of opportunity, and battle tactics for attacking and defending CV groups.

Offline Plawranc

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2683
      • Youtube Channel
Re: Japanese Navy
« Reply #78 on: October 08, 2009, 05:27:22 PM »
I'd once suggested that the Bishops have the fleet we have now, the Rooks get a British fleet and the Knights get a Japanese fleet.

That would cause some balance issues though, particularly for the Rooks as the British carriers may have been tough with armored flight decks, but they were much smaller than the Japanese and American fleet carriers so landing on them and taking off of them would be harder.

Why not just make it an asthetic change just give them the look but not the effects, scale up the british carrier if you like.

Plus think how cool it would be, king george vs Yamato, Missouri vs Mushashi. Would be awesome. And I fly rooks so it would be patriotic for me :D
DaPacman - 71 Squadron RAF

"There are only two things that make life worth living. Fornication and Aviation"

Offline RaptorL

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 292
Re: Japanese Navy
« Reply #79 on: October 08, 2009, 07:02:14 PM »
Why not just make it an aesthetic change just give them the look but not the effects, scale up the british carrier if you like.

Plus think how cool it would be, king george vs Yamato, Missouri vs Mushashi. Would be awesome. And I fly rooks so it would be patriotic for me :D

Its not good enough to just give it the model, it has to be as realistic and historically accurate. Besides no one likes it when you half bellybutton it.