Author Topic: And they said Ohio State is over rank?!?  (Read 1789 times)

Offline B17Skull12

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3839
Re: And they said Ohio State is over rank?!?
« Reply #15 on: September 20, 2009, 10:27:34 AM »
im still waiting to see Oregon State.  Jaquizz Rodgers is going to own USC this year.  Kind of like last year.  If that defense last year couldn't stop him, this years team is just going to get shredded.  The Pac 10 going to be either OSU or Cal.  Ill go for another Bold prediction USC is goingto lose 4 (count em 4) games atleast, not counting bowl.  Cal, Oregon, OSU, and one other lose to someone who they supposed to beat.
II/JG3 DGS II

Offline fudgums

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4055
Re: And they said Ohio State is over rank?!?
« Reply #16 on: September 20, 2009, 10:43:52 AM »
im still waiting to see Oregon State.  Jaquizz Rodgers is going to own USC this year. 

Cincinnati whipped them yesterday......
Did you even watch the game last week? OSU had the game down-pat until the last five minutes. We couldve won, had the OSU defense not lose its momentum. Naturally, OSU screwed it up when we needed a victory the most... But oh well, I still love my Buckeyes, and dont give a damn what anyone has to say to that.

Legend in the making....
"Masters of the Air" Scenario - JG27

Offline Becinhu

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2633
Re: And they said Ohio State is over rank?!?
« Reply #17 on: September 20, 2009, 12:03:42 PM »
They beat Miamai. Are they a team in the south? The OSU vs. FU was no excuse for OSU, they did not show up.  As far as playing LSU, you can blame the crappy BCS for putting OSU there.  They should have never played in that game.
They said a team in the south with SPEED...not that sells speed. Miami is the local county lock-up team.
412th Braunco Mustangs OG
412th FNVG FSO
80th FS "Headhunters" MA

Offline B17Skull12

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3839
Re: And they said Ohio State is over rank?!?
« Reply #18 on: September 20, 2009, 09:34:19 PM »
Cincinnati whipped them yesterday......
appearntly they know something USC didn't cause USC couldn't stop quizrodgers last year.
II/JG3 DGS II

Offline flight17

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1612
Re: And they said Ohio State is over rank?!?
« Reply #19 on: September 20, 2009, 09:50:43 PM »
Losing to USC two years in a row as well, and a freshman QB coming into their stadium and winning, something Pryor couldn't do....
my HS team use to play pryor...
« Last Edit: September 20, 2009, 09:52:46 PM by flight17 »
119th Riffle Tank Regiment leader -Red Storm Krupp Steel Scenario

Active Member of Air Heritage Inc. http://airheritage.org/

Offline DMBEAR

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1044
      • JG2 Richtofen
Re: And they said Ohio State is over rank?!?
« Reply #20 on: September 21, 2009, 03:11:58 PM »
Are you kidding me?  Is Ohio St. so desperate that they now have to be happy when the teams that came and beat them on their own field get beat by another team.

I would think that if USC had gone undefeated after dashing your hopes w/ a freshman led 4th quarter 80+ yd. drive, it would have reflected better on you.  Instead, they went out and proved how overrated they are again by losing to an upstart Washington program.  Therefore your loss to them should be a little harder to swallow.

Letting the Navy game go the way it did doesn't help your case either. 

That is why, as you put it, many say "Ohio State is over rank?!?"

I guess quite a few fans are tired of you getting through your weak Big10 schedule only to get to the NC game and choke.  Same thing goes for Choklahoma.   :rock








Offline Toecutter

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 24
Re: And they said Ohio State is over rank?!?
« Reply #21 on: September 21, 2009, 08:08:35 PM »
How do you get an Ohio State Graduate off your porch?

Pay him for the pizza. 

Sorry couldn't resist.  :devil

Offline oakranger

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8380
      • http://www.slybirds.com/
Re: And they said Ohio State is over rank?!?
« Reply #22 on: September 22, 2009, 12:52:25 AM »

I would think that if USC had gone undefeated after dashing your hopes w/ a freshman led 4th quarter 80+ yd. drive, it would have reflected better on you. 


Like i said, Berkly didn't do sh*t in that game.  It was McKight that pull it off for the team. Barkly is getting all the attention because he is the first freshman QB to start at USC and he led UCS to a "not so impressive" victory against San Jose State.  He is a joke of a QB that will never grow to the level excellent. 

And yes, OSU will speak up loud that maybe it is not Ohio State that is over rank, maybe it is USC.  At least Ohio state looses a game against a rank team unlike USC. 
Oaktree

56th Fighter group

Offline TheZohan

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 587
Re: And they said Ohio State is over rank?!?
« Reply #23 on: September 22, 2009, 01:15:26 AM »
put OSU in the SEC and Vanderbelt would beat them up.. they are overrated!

Offline DMBEAR

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1044
      • JG2 Richtofen
Re: And they said Ohio State is over rank?!?
« Reply #24 on: September 22, 2009, 01:58:33 AM »
Like i said, Berkly didn't do sh*t in that game.  It was McKight that pull it off for the team. Barkly is getting all the attention because he is the first freshman QB to start at USC and he led UCS to a "not so impressive" victory against San Jose State.  He is a joke of a QB that will never grow to the level excellent. 

And yes, OSU will speak up loud that maybe it is not Ohio State that is over rank, maybe it is USC.  At least Ohio state looses a game against a rank team unlike USC. 

You lost to a team that lost to an unranked team.  Then you brag that at least you didnt lose to an unranked team..  I don't understand you, but I know that your kind of logic prevails in the ranking system.

Here are some pics of the #2 LSU  playing your #1 OSU team in the BCS championship team in for the 2007 Championship.  :rofl  :D  :rock








Offline oakranger

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8380
      • http://www.slybirds.com/
Re: And they said Ohio State is over rank?!?
« Reply #25 on: September 22, 2009, 02:15:59 AM »
You lost to a team that lost to an unranked team.  Then you brag that at least you didnt lose to an unranked team..  I don't understand you, but I know that your kind of logic prevails in the ranking system.

Here are some pics of the #2 LSU  playing your #1 OSU team in the BCS championship team in for the 2007 Championship.  :rofl  :D  :rock

(Image removed from quote.)
(Image removed from quote.)
(Image removed from quote.)
(Image removed from quote.)
(Image removed from quote.)



It is simple.  USC thought they are unstoppable after they beat Ohio State, then they lost to Washington.  So, where are they now?  I don't hear much of them saying they are unstoppable.  I certinally don't hear Ohio State saying anything this year that they are unstoppable.

About the 2007 National championship game, yea, Ohio state did not belong there.  They where not national championship contenders that year.  That what burns me up.  People say that OSU shouldn't have been in that game, they choke.  OK, so who put them there in the first place? 
Oaktree

56th Fighter group

Offline DMBEAR

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1044
      • JG2 Richtofen
Re: And they said Ohio State is over rank?!?
« Reply #26 on: September 22, 2009, 12:29:35 PM »
And how about USC losing to an unranked team yesterday?!?! They got beat by Washington. That's like Michigan losing to Appalachain State and Oregon last year.

Hardly.  App ST. was one of the most embarrasing losses in College football history.  The Big 10 can't sweep that debacle under the rug that easily.  Nice try though.  ;)

Offline oakranger

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8380
      • http://www.slybirds.com/
Re: And they said Ohio State is over rank?!?
« Reply #27 on: September 22, 2009, 02:09:18 PM »
Hardly.  App ST. was one of the most embarrasing losses in College football history.  The Big 10 can't sweep that debacle under the rug that easily.  Nice try though.  ;)

That will follow Michigan for a long time.  Or until all the players that where on the team at the time of the game are gone.  Same team, different players different results.  I don't know how anyone can bash any team like OU or Ohio State from a blow game that happen 2-3 years ago and try to say they are the same now.
Oaktree

56th Fighter group

Offline DMBEAR

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1044
      • JG2 Richtofen
Re: And they said Ohio State is over rank?!?
« Reply #28 on: September 22, 2009, 02:41:32 PM »
That will follow Michigan for a long time.  Or until all the players that where on the team at the time of the game are gone.  Same team, different players different results.  I don't know how anyone can bash any team like OU or Ohio State from a blow game that happen 2-3 years ago and try to say they are the same now.

I'll tell you how.  When you keep choking you gotta win your way out of it.  Instead Ohio St. keeps getting the token top 10 ranking.  This year it was #6.

Look at the Top ten today.  Do you notice anything interesting about one of those teams?  I'll help you.  Choklahoma is the only team that has 1 loss and is in the top 10.  It's the same BS that happens every year.   USC and Ohio ST. are #12, and #13.  Look how far other teams fall when they get 1 loss.  Va tech lost to Alabama who is still unbeaten, therefore you can make an argument for them.

Ohio St. was a 2pt conversion away from being 1-2.  Please tell me why they are ranked so high.  Please try.  Michigan is 3-0 yet they are ranked 23rd.  I'm no Mich. fan, but they havnt lost.

Since schools like Ohio St and Choklahoma keep getting a high preseason rank and then choke in the big games after all the hype, year after year, you start to get a reputation.

And remember, the players may come and go, but Stoops,Tressel, and their systems stay constant. 




Offline oakranger

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8380
      • http://www.slybirds.com/
Re: And they said Ohio State is over rank?!?
« Reply #29 on: September 23, 2009, 01:11:37 AM »
I'll tell you how.  When you keep choking you gotta win your way out of it.  Instead Ohio St. keeps getting the token top 10 ranking.  This year it was #6.

Look at the Top ten today.  Do you notice anything interesting about one of those teams?  I'll help you.  Choklahoma is the only team that has 1 loss and is in the top 10.  It's the same BS that happens every year.   USC and Ohio ST. are #12, and #13.  Look how far other teams fall when they get 1 loss.  Va tech lost to Alabama who is still unbeaten, therefore you can make an argument for them.

Ohio St. was a 2pt conversion away from being 1-2.  Please tell me why they are ranked so high.  Please try.  Michigan is 3-0 yet they are ranked 23rd.  I'm no Mich. fan, but they havnt lost.

Since schools like Ohio St and Choklahoma keep getting a high preseason rank and then choke in the big games after all the hype, year after year, you start to get a reputation.

And remember, the players may come and go, but Stoops,Tressel, and their systems stay constant. 






MONEY!  Thats how.
Oaktree

56th Fighter group