Author Topic: "Still fly with more damage" setting?  (Read 1947 times)

Offline oakranger

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8380
      • http://www.slybirds.com/
"Still fly with more damage" setting?
« on: November 20, 2009, 03:16:17 PM »
Is it possible to set some AC to take a huge beating of damage but still fly.  Looking at real pic of bombers nearly flyable make one think how they even got the bird home.
Oaktree

56th Fighter group

Offline gyrene81

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11629
Re: "Still fly with more damage" setting?
« Reply #1 on: November 20, 2009, 03:17:47 PM »


That's one of the best examples...  :O


Another one:
jarhed  
Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day...
Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. - Terry Pratchett

Offline Pongo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6701
Re: "Still fly with more damage" setting?
« Reply #2 on: November 20, 2009, 03:20:41 PM »
I see planes landing with half a wing gone all the time.

Offline Simba

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 725
Re: "Still fly with more damage" setting?
« Reply #3 on: November 20, 2009, 04:05:08 PM »
It's my experience that the AH Spitfire flys and lands quite well with half a wing missing. That'll do me.

 :cool:

Simba
No.6 Squadron vRFC/RAF

Offline WPmega

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 68
Re: "Still fly with more damage" setting?
« Reply #4 on: November 20, 2009, 04:22:41 PM »
not only that but most people in AH dont even know where to hit a bomber to kill it in the first place so the bomber takes a TON of damage.

Offline Strip

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3319
Re: "Still fly with more damage" setting?
« Reply #5 on: November 20, 2009, 05:35:35 PM »
I send more bombers to there graves without shooting a single part off.....fire is the name of the game!

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: "Still fly with more damage" setting?
« Reply #6 on: November 20, 2009, 06:07:07 PM »
Just because a few instances of planes that were able to make it home after such severe damage doesn't mean the plane was able to withstand such heavy damage.  A lot of times those that survived did so because it just wasn't their time to go.  For every plane that was shown with the damage like in the photos that were posted, dozens more were lost that received just as much or less damage.


ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline WPmega

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 68
Re: "Still fly with more damage" setting?
« Reply #7 on: November 20, 2009, 06:09:42 PM »
completely agree with Ack Ack


JB76

Offline Strip

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3319
Re: "Still fly with more damage" setting?
« Reply #8 on: November 20, 2009, 06:21:17 PM »
Like airplanes losing control from a few rounds severing control cables.

More than ten feet away and you might no even see damage....

If you want more damage you better be able to except less!

Offline ZZee

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 31
      • POTW
Re: "Still fly with more damage" setting?
« Reply #9 on: November 20, 2009, 08:22:00 PM »
well said ack-ack.
POTW 2nd wing

Offline ink

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11274
Re: "Still fly with more damage" setting?
« Reply #10 on: November 20, 2009, 09:05:44 PM »
if anything I think the P47 should be able to take more, that is one plane that was well known for taking damage and surviving.

Offline Strip

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3319
Re: "Still fly with more damage" setting?
« Reply #11 on: November 20, 2009, 09:12:30 PM »
For a single engine fighter it does....only the Il-2 will soak up more ammo.

I fly the P-47 a lot too, it takes a beating and gets home.

Strip

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: "Still fly with more damage" setting?
« Reply #12 on: November 20, 2009, 09:42:21 PM »
if anything I think the P47 should be able to take more, that is one plane that was well known for taking damage and surviving.

Quite a few US fighters were known for their rugged construction, like the Jug, Corsair, Wildcat, Hellcat and Lightning.


ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline Enker

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1553
Re: "Still fly with more damage" setting?
« Reply #13 on: November 20, 2009, 10:01:20 PM »
if anything I think the P47 should be able to take more, that is one plane that was well known for taking damage and surviving.
Like in Robert Johnson's autobiography, when he was pursued by a 190 pilot? The 190 only had its 7.7mm guns left, and poured round after round into the rear of the P-47, yet it kept flying. Thank goodness for pilot armor.

I dunno, I think the P-47 already soaks up plenty of damage.
InGame ID: Cairn
Quote from: BillyD topic=283300.msg3581799#msg3581799
... FOR TEH MUPPET$ TO PAD OUR SCO?E N to WIN TEH EPIC WAR OF TEH UNIVERSE We MUST VULTCHE DA RUNWAYZ N DROP UR GUYZ FIGHTERZ Bunkarz Then OUR SKWAD will Finarry Get TACTICAL NOOK for 25 KILL SCORE  STREAK>X

Offline oakranger

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8380
      • http://www.slybirds.com/
Re: "Still fly with more damage" setting?
« Reply #14 on: November 21, 2009, 02:03:02 AM »
Like in Robert Johnson's autobiography, when he was pursued by a 190 pilot? The 190 only had its 7.7mm guns left, and poured round after round into the rear of the P-47, yet it kept flying. Thank goodness for pilot armor.

I dunno, I think the P-47 already soaks up plenty of damage.

Yea, i notice that it dose too.  But bomber, personally, should take more of a beating.
Oaktree

56th Fighter group