Why do we want any of these bombers? Halifax, Hampden, Wellington, Stirling, Manchester???
All were under powered deathtraps, they were forced to fly at the back and base of the bomber stream because they were so slow and lacked ceiling, were terribly armed and armoured.
In 1943/4 Bomber Command was considering removing defensive armament entirely from bombers. The weapons fitted were hopelessly ineffective 0.303's, the bombers could not provide all round defence as they flew almost exclusively at night, and were picked at will by bf110 night fighters with radar, and it was considered that the loss off turrets and weight would add 50 mph to the top speed, reduce fuel consumption, but most of all save 3-5 crew in each a/c.
If i had the mental faculties required to upload it, i have a picture here of Wellington rear gunner position, that is just no longer there, all thats left is riddled stanchions and tattered aluminium. Very often rear and mid upper gunners would return "unrecognisable as human forms"
Now a Bristol Beaufighter is an entirely different proposition