The argument isn't about who is anti-war and who isn't. Only a child thinks war is something "fun". The argument is about how to best prevent the next war or at least prevent the global conflicts that kill by the millions.
Someone from nearly every human civilization throughout history has tried to figure out how to do that and not one has been successful.
Ya from what Ive read, racism was a key factor in why went to war, and how it was fought throughout. My great Uncle was in the Pacific, he hated everyone. I often wondered if the war made him that way or if he was just born mean.
After reading through this thread I am truly amazed at the number of people who don't know U.S. history. Racism wasn't a "key factor" in the U.S. declaring war, prejudice and bigotry kept us out until December 7, 1941. Prior to that date racial segregation was a part of American life but Asians weren't subjected to it except in some extreme Southern states...afterward, anyone who even looked like they were of Japanese descent was rounded up and put into internment camps...even if they were American citizens or married to American citizens...it took legal action and sometimes political action to get them out. There were some cases of German immigrants (even Jewish descent) being rounded up and put into internment camps...because of the suspicion of spies.
If Tom Hanks had specifically stated that the U.S. servicemen were and are racist, he would have more right than wrong...if you really think that "mick", "spic", "tojo", "nip", "darky", "kraut", "daygo", "haji", "dink", "slope", etc... are all words derived from love for ones fellow man you couldn't be more wrong if you tried.