Author Topic: "The Pacific" Part 4  (Read 2269 times)

Offline -tronski-

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2825
Re: "The Pacific" Part 4
« Reply #30 on: April 07, 2010, 02:50:15 AM »

I guess I'm just a bit biased by Hanks remark about how they were racists.

Thats not what he meant, his remarks are being taken out of context

 Tronsky
God created Arrakis to train the faithful

Offline guncrasher

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17360
Re: "The Pacific" Part 4
« Reply #31 on: April 07, 2010, 02:52:58 AM »
Read "The Rape of Nanking" and then try to equate the Americans and the Japanese.  One estimate is 30 million Chinese killed by the Japanese.



like I said, I wasn't judging.  I am not trying to criticize what we did back in ww2.  in a way I understand why some soldiers killed prisioners and and sometimes civilians.  u get in a firefight and you will shoot anything that moves, or see your buddy get killed and you want payback. we were not like the germans, japanese or the Italians who executed millions for no reason.  

semp
you dont want me to ho, dont point your plane at me.

Offline DREDger

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 766
Re: "The Pacific" Part 4
« Reply #32 on: April 07, 2010, 08:16:46 AM »
Well, if you compare the two books the series was based on, Leckie's and Sledge's, E.B. Sledge's book is the better, and in my opinion, by a large margin.

I liked them both, funny though, I though Leckie's book was a little better.  Seemed more literary to me.

Offline Gooss

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 593
      • http://www.327th.com
Re: "The Pacific" Part 4
« Reply #33 on: April 07, 2010, 03:33:01 PM »
we were not like the germans, japanese or the Italians who executed millions for no reason.  

semp

Whew.  I'm glad you clarified.  <S>

HONK!
Gooss
CHICKS DIG GULLWINGS
flying and dying since Tour 19

Offline Tango

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1421
      • http://www.simpilots.org/
Re: "The Pacific" Part 4
« Reply #34 on: April 07, 2010, 05:55:40 PM »
Thats not what he meant, his remarks are being taken out of context

 Tronsky

Kind of hard to be taken out of context when its a video of him saying it.

Tango78
78th Razorbacks
Historical Air Combat Group

Offline Stoney

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3482
Re: "The Pacific" Part 4
« Reply #35 on: April 07, 2010, 08:09:39 PM »
Kind of hard to be taken out of context when its a video of him saying it.



For all the stuff he's done for veterans of WWII, you think he would actually bad mouth them?  Tom Hanks is not some stereotypical Hollywood type...

What he said was:  "“...Back in World War II, we viewed the Japanese as ‘yellow, slant-eyed dogs’ that believed in different gods. They were out to kill us because our way of living was different. We, in turn, wanted to annihilate them because they were different..." And in another interview:  "...The Pacific' is coming out now, where it represents a war that was of racism and terror. And where it seemed as though the only way to complete one of these battles on one of these small specks of rock in the middle of nowhere was to - I’m sorry - kill them all..."

If you read about the racism that permeated the PTO, or have spoken with a veteran of the Pacific war, you know this is a pretty accurate description.  In no way does this slander the service our Soldiers, Sailors, and Marines performed for this country during the war.
"Can we be incorrect at times, absolutely, but I do believe 15 years of experience does deserve a little more credence and respect than you have given from your very first post."

HiTech

Offline lyric1

  • Skinner Team
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10632
Re: "The Pacific" Part 4
« Reply #36 on: April 07, 2010, 08:14:23 PM »
What he said was:  "“...Back in World War II, we viewed the Japanese as ‘yellow, slant-eyed dogs’ that believed in different gods. They were out to kill us because our way of living was different. We, in turn, wanted to annihilate them because they were different..." If you read about the racism that permeated the PTO, or have spoken with a veteran of the Pacific war, you know this is a pretty accurate description.  In no way does this slander the service our Soldiers, Sailors, and Marines performed for this country during the war.
Till my fathers dieing day he never forgave the Japanese.  The comments he had always made makes all the above very tame.

Offline -tronski-

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2825
Re: "The Pacific" Part 4
« Reply #37 on: April 08, 2010, 02:51:46 AM »
Kind of hard to be taken out of context when its a video of him saying it.



Stoney has pretty much summed up exactly what I was going to say - you'll find that context is often the most important thing and tho some have seen Hanks mention racism as being "part" of the overall conflict and come away with Tom Hanks says PTO was racist ergo all veterans are racists, this was far far from the point he was making. I would've hoped his actions in regards to the D-Day Museum, and other veteran groups spoke more about the man than any misconceptions.

 Tronsky
God created Arrakis to train the faithful

Offline FiLtH

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6448
Re: "The Pacific" Part 4
« Reply #38 on: April 08, 2010, 07:32:21 AM »
Till my fathers dieing day he never forgave the Japanese.  The comments he had always made makes all the above very tame.

    Ya from what Ive read, racism was a key factor in why went to war, and how it was fought throughout. My great Uncle was in the Pacific, he hated everyone. I often wondered if the war made him that way or if he was just born mean.

~AoM~

Offline Stoney

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3482
Re: "The Pacific" Part 4
« Reply #39 on: April 08, 2010, 10:46:13 AM »
And just to expound a little...

I remember in the BoB documentary that was included with the DVD set, Shifty Powers made the comment that (and I paraphrase) "...in another situation, those German soldiers and me might have been good friends.  He might have liked to fish and I might have liked to hunt..."

There was no such identification with the Japanese soldiers from Allied troops in PTO.  Personally, I think its one of the more fascinating things about the Pacific war.
"Can we be incorrect at times, absolutely, but I do believe 15 years of experience does deserve a little more credence and respect than you have given from your very first post."

HiTech

Offline gyrene81

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11629
Re: "The Pacific" Part 4
« Reply #40 on: April 08, 2010, 11:53:29 AM »
The argument isn't about who is anti-war and who isn't. Only a child thinks war is something "fun". The argument is about how to best prevent the next war or at least prevent the global conflicts that kill by the millions.
Someone from nearly every human civilization throughout history has tried to figure out how to do that and not one has been successful.



Ya from what Ive read, racism was a key factor in why went to war, and how it was fought throughout. My great Uncle was in the Pacific, he hated everyone. I often wondered if the war made him that way or if he was just born mean.
After reading through this thread I am truly amazed at the number of people who don't know U.S. history. Racism wasn't a "key factor" in the U.S. declaring war, prejudice and bigotry kept us out until December 7, 1941. Prior to that date racial segregation was a part of American life but Asians weren't subjected to it except in some extreme Southern states...afterward, anyone who even looked like they were of Japanese descent was rounded up and put into internment camps...even if they were American citizens or married to American citizens...it took legal action and sometimes political action to get them out. There were some cases of German immigrants (even Jewish descent) being rounded up and put into internment camps...because of the suspicion of spies.

If Tom Hanks had specifically stated that the U.S. servicemen were and are racist, he would have more right than wrong...if you really think that "mick", "spic", "tojo", "nip", "darky", "kraut", "daygo", "haji", "dink", "slope", etc... are all words derived from love for ones fellow man you couldn't be more wrong if you tried.
jarhed  
Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day...
Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. - Terry Pratchett

Offline Stoney

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3482
Re: "The Pacific" Part 4
« Reply #41 on: April 08, 2010, 12:32:31 PM »
Prior to that date racial segregation was a part of American life but Asians weren't subjected to it except in some extreme Southern states...

There's probably a lot of Chinese in the western states that would have disagreed with you.
"Can we be incorrect at times, absolutely, but I do believe 15 years of experience does deserve a little more credence and respect than you have given from your very first post."

HiTech

Offline gyrene81

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11629
Re: "The Pacific" Part 4
« Reply #42 on: April 08, 2010, 01:31:18 PM »
There's probably a lot of Chinese in the western states that would have disagreed with you.
LOL...Stoney, I wasn't thinking about the 19th Century but good call...totally forgot about Chinatown.
jarhed  
Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day...
Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. - Terry Pratchett

Offline Tango

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1421
      • http://www.simpilots.org/
Re: "The Pacific" Part 4
« Reply #43 on: April 08, 2010, 07:19:49 PM »
Stoney has pretty much summed up exactly what I was going to say - you'll find that context is often the most important thing and tho some have seen Hanks mention racism as being "part" of the overall conflict and come away with Tom Hanks says PTO was racist ergo all veterans are racists, this was far far from the point he was making. I would've hoped his actions in regards to the D-Day Museum, and other veteran groups spoke more about the man than any misconceptions.

 Tronsky

The reason the Japs were hated at that time was not because they were inferior or the color of thier skin, but because of what they did at Pearl Harbor. For him to state that our soldiers were racist was wrong. He made it sound as though the whole US military was.
Tango78
78th Razorbacks
Historical Air Combat Group

Offline lyric1

  • Skinner Team
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10632
Re: "The Pacific" Part 4
« Reply #44 on: April 08, 2010, 07:29:37 PM »
    Ya from what Ive read, racism was a key factor in why went to war, and how it was fought throughout. My great Uncle was in the Pacific, he hated everyone. I often wondered if the war made him that way or if he was just born mean.
You only have to go back & look at the news reels of the day & training films provided to troops to see that the enemy was made out to be less than human. Why? very simple it is a lot easier to kill some one if you believe they are inferior to you. So race most certainly was a part of the war & in particular the Pacific.