Author Topic: Stab change  (Read 5478 times)

Offline FLS

  • AH Training Corps
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11621
      • Trainer's Website
Re: Stab change
« Reply #75 on: April 19, 2010, 01:44:05 PM »
Why not just increase AOA to compensate? You'd be using aileron, elevator and rudder all together in any case.

Offline Ardy123

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3417
Re: Stab change
« Reply #76 on: April 19, 2010, 01:55:16 PM »
I've noticed that on some planes the h-stab is above the point at which the fuselage connects to the v-stab and rather the h-stab goes through the v-stab. On these planes, if you shoot off the v-stab, the h-stab some how stays connected even though its floating above the fuselage. Also, I'd imagine that removing half of the h-stab would put so much uneven force on the v-stab, that it would bend or break it off.
Yeah, that's right, you just got your rear handed to you by a fuggly puppet!
==Army of Muppets==
(Bunnies)

Offline dirtdart

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1847
Re: Stab change
« Reply #77 on: April 19, 2010, 08:11:29 PM »
Any input you make has a consequence.  If I input aileron to compensate for loss of wing, nose drops.  I input elevator to raise nose and increase AOA, I decrease speed and lift.  I think what is in order here is some posts of "most shot up planes you have ever seen still flying", but that is indeed a new thread!
If you are not GFC...you are wee!
Put on your boots boots boots...and parachutes..chutes...chutes.. .
Illigitimus non carborundum

Offline fuzeman

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9077
Re: Stab change
« Reply #78 on: April 19, 2010, 09:34:04 PM »
Nevermind, didn't read past page 1 before posting.
Far too many, if not most, people on this Board post just to say something opposed to posting when they have something to say.

The Bunker Busters;
Aces High Scenario
1/JG26

Offline Gr8pape

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 195
      • Swamp Revel Computers
Re: Stab change
« Reply #79 on: April 20, 2010, 12:37:05 AM »
I think we all need to agree to disagree because this is just a rehash of the same argument over and over. Didn't HiTech answer this already with his force modeler?
I would rather try and fail, than not try at all. (paraphrased)
F.D. Roosevelt