Author Topic: Debate: Penguin vs Gyrene  (Read 7627 times)

Offline Jayhawk

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3909
Re: Debate: Penguin vs Gyrene
« Reply #30 on: April 27, 2010, 01:46:33 PM »
1 vote for intelligent design.



In my opinion, there are just too many holes in the theory of evolution.   :rolleyes:

EDIT

I disagree, but feel I'm edging too close to rule 14.  Staying out of the religion talk.
« Last Edit: April 27, 2010, 01:57:24 PM by Jayhawk »
LOOK EVERYBODY!  I GOT MY NAME IN LIGHTS!

Folks, play nice.

Offline MORAY37

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2318
Re: Debate: Penguin vs Gyrene
« Reply #31 on: April 27, 2010, 01:56:34 PM »
It is not necessary to understand things in order to argue about them.
Pierre Beaumarchais (1732 - 1799)


For all concerned parties in this "debate". Neither one of you has even the most simplistic idea of what you are arguing about.

Penguin, go back to reading, and graduate...etc...as you don't yet have a clue what you are talking about.  Gyrene will tear you apart, with dictatorial arrogance, with your current stance and weak factual basis.  You are so keen to stir the pot on this board, constantly, without even a base understanding of what you debate.  The world isn't 8th period biology class.

Can you tell me what Haldane's Rule is and what effect it conveys upon autosomal alleles, and why this is important in genetic variability?  Without googling it?  No, you can't.  Therefore, even entering this debate is suicide for you.

 I've told you this in private before.  You do considerably more harm to "factual reality" (i.e. Science) in your weak debate than your silence in these matters would.  All you do is re-enforce stupidity and ignorance, with these persistent "debates", of which you don't know what you're talking about.  As well, even if you win an internet debate, isn't that like being the winner of the Special Olympics decathlon?  You pretty much stomped an entire thread that was going just fine until your incredibly well timed entry. (Your Global Warming debauchery and "pollution" stance)

 Use your energy to study, it will be more rewarding.  You aren't even close to being able to defend your position.

« Last Edit: April 27, 2010, 02:08:05 PM by MORAY37 »
"Ocean: A body of water occupying 2/3 of a world made for man...who has no gills."
-Ambrose Bierce

Offline MORAY37

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2318
Re: Debate: Penguin vs Gyrene
« Reply #32 on: April 27, 2010, 02:27:03 PM »
Sorry Penguin, I'm trying to get used to using my new joystick...as mentioned above.  :D
If you are talking the ancestor being a single cell organism, that is probable if the single cell organism had the ability to change its own genetic structure to evolve into different life forms...but that is where it stops, an invertebrate cannot evolve into a vertbrate of a higher order nor can that ancestor of a higher order change itself to the point of evolving into an even higher life form in a different order...contrary to the popular beliefs by lay evolutionists, otherwise the human genome could be reverse engineered through genetic manipulation and we could all have gills.


Of all ideas on evolution the easiest to prove (to a point) is Micro evolution...and to that I offer no argument as I have seen it myself. Organic evolution could be argued as part of the theory of Macro evolution...but I agree with science in that it is separate and though arguable, it is generally agreed that at the lowest common denominator, it is provable to a point. Macro evolution is the theory that seems to be the most popular for those who argue against intelligent design...and has yet to be proven based on the scientific method.

I'll leave it to Penguin to decide which area he wants to try and argue.  :D

Spectacularly wrong, on all counts, and dripping with bias throughout.  Well written though.   :aok

I know which one is human- Can anyone else tell me?



As well, a picture of atavism, or re-expression of an earlier genetic trait. Coccygeal process, in humans


Atavism in dolphin.

Expressionary atavism in relation to syndactyly

Atavism in snake

« Last Edit: April 27, 2010, 02:43:37 PM by MORAY37 »
"Ocean: A body of water occupying 2/3 of a world made for man...who has no gills."
-Ambrose Bierce

Offline FireDrgn

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1115
Re: Debate: Penguin vs Gyrene
« Reply #33 on: April 27, 2010, 03:20:01 PM »
So when do we get to start killing and eating people.  Do they also taste like pig?
"When the student is ready the teacher will appear."   I am not a teacher.

Offline gyrene81

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11629
Re: Debate: Penguin vs Gyrene
« Reply #34 on: April 27, 2010, 03:45:14 PM »
LOL...Moray, I now know why you call yourself that...swallow it whole without looking at the contents to see if there is any danger...first Haldane's rule (which does not apply to all life forms), then the pics of dormant genetic traits that rarely show up and supposedly prove prior genetic traits in the species.

The fetus on the left is human. But just because a pig fetus resembles a human fetus at some stage in development, it doesn't mean either fetus could possibly be born a chimp or salmon. Modern science has been trying to tell us we came to our present state from fish...just because of fish fossils were found with what appear to be fingers in their flippers...I can believe the link to salamanders and lizards but, it does not work to homo-sapiens.

My only bias is that I will not swallow everything that is thrown at me and for good reason...magnetism is not witch craft...astrology is not the work of satanic cults...Columbus was not the first European to land on North American soil...the moon is not made of cheese nor is it inhabited...Mars is not full of canals and humanoid inhabitants...Venus is not inhabited by Amazonian women...the world is not flat and Atlas is not holding it up on his shoulders...the earth is older than 6500 years...people who look at what is presented with a critical eye and equally examine all evidence for and against without bias are the ones who can see truth and bring progress to humanity...the ones who swallow whatever is presented without question, become mindless zealots.


I prefer to be more like Galileo, Socrates, Aristotle, Darwin and Einstein.
jarhed  
Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day...
Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. - Terry Pratchett

Offline MORAY37

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2318
Re: Debate: Penguin vs Gyrene
« Reply #35 on: April 27, 2010, 04:19:51 PM »
LOL...Moray, I now know why you call yourself that...swallow it whole without looking at the contents to see if there is any danger...first Haldane's rule (which does not apply to all life forms), then the pics of dormant genetic traits that rarely show up and supposedly prove prior genetic traits in the species.



Irony.
"Ocean: A body of water occupying 2/3 of a world made for man...who has no gills."
-Ambrose Bierce

Offline Simba

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 725
Re: Debate: Penguin vs Gyrene
« Reply #36 on: April 27, 2010, 05:07:46 PM »
I think, therefore I am.

I observe and measure and hypothesise, then I statistically test the hypothesis. I then publish my work so that others may test it by replication and debate its veracity by logical argument. I am a scientist.

I often believe in good order and the teachings and experiences of others so that I may do more with my life than pursue obscure knowledge for its own sake. I don't have to ask a bus driver for a look at his driving licence in order to ride on his bus without fear, I have faith that he is fit to get me where I want to go. I am a pragmatist.

I wonder at what I do not know, I imagine, I ramble, I fantasise. I am a dreamer.

I take a drawing, I work from it with my mind and hands to produce an artefact that carries out a useful function. I am an engineer.

I am all of these things, I am a human being, not a god, or a believer in gods.

And I will do my very best to enjoy this phase of existence until my body breaks up and its component molecules whirl off to become - what?

Ah, the great unknown, it's so necessary for stimulating curious ol' cats like me.

I shall follow this debate with interest - cheers!

 :cool:
 

 
« Last Edit: April 27, 2010, 06:01:56 PM by Simba »
Simba
No.6 Squadron vRFC/RAF

Offline Sonicblu

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 653
Re: Debate: Penguin vs Gyrene
« Reply #37 on: April 27, 2010, 06:45:27 PM »
You are trying to make a point with big words and pics that look similar to each other. It doesnt make it a fact.

If I lined up all my pots and pans in my kitchen and said hey look they evolved form the little one here. You would call me crazy. It points to a common I/D. So would all animals IF they have a common I/D they would be similar. as they are made from the same "stuff".
 
Darwin is a dog.
Darwin is a god.
Both have identical letters but two different meanings. But as a writer that is all the "Stuff" i have to work with. So both will have similarities.


Just because one was born with a tail doesn't prove Prior genentic traits. There are many things that could affect a fetus and make it abnormal. Like pollutants. Babies are born all the time with what would be called abnormal features, and you pick only one to prove your point. That means all other traits that don't prove your point oppose them. If they are both used as evidence there are far more abnormal traits that would suggest something else. Like corrupt genetics.

What we can observe is that species reproduce after thier kind. A sheep always produced a sheep,a pig a pig, a human a human. The simplest organism on the planet still only reproduced itself.  So there is no way to go back and claim common ancestor. Empirical evidence teachest us one thing. I am still waiting for any forensic evidence that might prove otherwise.

You leave out the possibility on your pics that those traits could be caused by pollutants or a damaged genetic code. You just presuppose that it must be prior traits.

Offline MORAY37

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2318
Re: Debate: Penguin vs Gyrene
« Reply #38 on: April 27, 2010, 08:40:04 PM »


You leave out the possibility on your pics that those traits could be caused by pollutants or a damaged genetic code. You just presuppose that it must be prior traits.

It's actually not supposition. Every single example I showed is proven (and basic, as in the first 50 pages of most texts) genetics, and has zip to do with damage or mutation of the DNA or RNA.  Your response, however, was strictly conjectural and based in opinion, and not fact.
« Last Edit: April 27, 2010, 09:05:27 PM by MORAY37 »
"Ocean: A body of water occupying 2/3 of a world made for man...who has no gills."
-Ambrose Bierce

Offline Denholm

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9667
      • No. 603 Squadron
Re: Debate: Penguin vs Gyrene
« Reply #39 on: April 27, 2010, 10:06:20 PM »
Every example proves what? That one in billions is different? What happens after the one passes, have the rest changed? I'm not denying changes happen, I'm denying that a change in one of billions brings about glorious new features for all that follow.
Get your Daily Dose of Flame!
FlameThink.com
No. 603 Squadron... Visit us on the web, if you dare.

Drug addicts are always disappointed after eating Pot Pies.

Offline FireDrgn

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1115
Re: Debate: Penguin vs Gyrene
« Reply #40 on: April 27, 2010, 10:39:24 PM »
Is there any information on how many life forms must be produced for one macro evolution to take place... ARe we talking 10,000 life cycles per or 10.billion per or more.?

"When the student is ready the teacher will appear."   I am not a teacher.

Offline gyrene81

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11629
Re: Debate: Penguin vs Gyrene
« Reply #41 on: April 27, 2010, 10:57:25 PM »
It's actually not supposition. Every single example I showed is proven (and basic, as in the first 50 pages of most texts) genetics, and has zip to do with damage or mutation of the DNA or RNA.  Your response, however, was strictly conjectural and based in opinion, and not fact.
Sorry Moray...and by the way...I'm really liking the way this thread is going...good, bad, indifferent...  :aok ...just try not to make anything personal guys...this is simply a discussion and blatant personal attacks have no place.


As I was saying, sorry Moray...it has everything to do with damage and or mutation within the genetic code of all species. Without those mutations neither Darwin nor Haldane would be correct since a change of any characteristic is a mutation of the base genetic code...doesn't matter if it is a mistake, environmental damage, space dust or alien DNA.

And I know that is overly simplified but you understand what I'm saying.




Is there any information on how many life forms must be produced for one macro evolution to take place... ARe we talking 10,000 life cycles per or 10.billion per or more.?
Just to keep it simple, it depends on the reproductive rate of the life form and how many times a genetic trait is changed within the population from generation to generation to become dominant. For example to create a new purebred dog using selective breeding, I believe it takes 7 generations.
« Last Edit: April 27, 2010, 11:02:21 PM by gyrene81 »
jarhed  
Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day...
Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. - Terry Pratchett

Offline MORAY37

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2318
Re: Debate: Penguin vs Gyrene
« Reply #42 on: April 28, 2010, 09:31:40 AM »
LOL...Moray, I now know why you call yourself that...swallow it whole without looking at the contents to see if there is any danger...



Your above comment isn't Personal?  You ask me to not be personal, when I simply point out your position is not based in already understood genetics?

Gyrene, the reasons for atavism are well understood, as is the mechanism for the expression of the genes.  I'm sorry you won't accept it as such.  I assure you, it is a basic first-semester Genetics tenet.

Interesting paper detailing Coccygeal process in humans.
http://www.jbjs.org.uk/cgi/reprint/62-B/4/508.pdf

"Ocean: A body of water occupying 2/3 of a world made for man...who has no gills."
-Ambrose Bierce

Offline Plawranc

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2683
      • Youtube Channel
Re: Debate: Penguin vs Gyrene
« Reply #43 on: April 28, 2010, 09:32:54 AM »
In my view life itself is all quite simple, as far as I can gather this debate began with the discussion on what is fact and what is truth and what is whatever. It has now quite ironically evolved into a debate on evolution.

Now I am not going to attack it the way you all seem to be doing which is attempting to use so called fact's or truth's to argue your position. I am going to discuss the element which no one has touched on. Us ourselves.

Now who devised all these theories in the first place, us. Now fact Gyrene rightly says is a known occurence or process that has been backed up by scientific and mathematical testing and subsequent proof.
However Penguin has his merits as well. The theories he has put forward are generally considered the accepted beginning of the Universe and the beginning and development of life.

Now here is Gyrene's fault, there is no way of testing these two theories conclusively. Evidence however points towards these being true. But don't take that wrong because Penguin is also off, you see posing a scientific hypothosis on these two while they have tonnes of evidence, by technicality you are incorrect because they aren't PROVEN so it cannot be taken as fact.

My point is here, the Human mind is a very curious and in depth organism, it needs to know as much as it can about its enviroment. We compensate for our impossibility of testing these theories by taking what evidence we can gather and applying it into a logical history, or we label it supernatural and then religion comes in in which we use our imaginations to satisfy our needs to know. Saying god did it has been the way of getting out of these tricky questions for ages and that I think is why we still follow them closely even though they are usually untrue, grotesque and grossly outdated.

So our mind adapts to suit itself when it is impossible to explain something thereby making all unproven theories false until confirmed. so we say god or a sacred ghost did it and that it is the universe or a higher power that decides this particular part of the worlds workings.

Now for my personal argument, I am on penguins side. I am a supporter of the evolution theory, it has already been shown that our minds compensate for lack of information or knowledge by creating foundationless theories on how god or L Ron Hubbard created the universe.

So when faced with odds that mean death unless we adapt to an enviroment it seems logical that our bodies can follow suit. Take Africans for example, their continetn is hot and dry, it has been like that for thousands of years. The human race originally inuit and sheet white for living in polar conditions during the Ice Age change their skin pigmentation to resist the sun and heat of a desert climate, why have Asians got exceedingly light build and an exceptional fluid retention capability, because they evolved in a tropical climate, why are europeans white as sheets and put on weight easily, to resist long winteers and blizzards of a european climate. Animals do the same and so do amoeba. The mutations shown by moray prove the existance of genetics and therefore evolution as a whole.

At least that is my take. Ok time to put my hazmat and flame resistant clothes on.
DaPacman - 71 Squadron RAF

"There are only two things that make life worth living. Fornication and Aviation"

Offline MORAY37

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2318
Re: Debate: Penguin vs Gyrene
« Reply #44 on: April 28, 2010, 09:47:06 AM »
Is there any information on how many life forms must be produced for one macro evolution to take place... ARe we talking 10,000 life cycles per or 10.billion per or more.?



That's a slippery slope.  It depends upon whether you are talking allopatric or sympatric speciation. Also, there needs to be a reproductive isolating mechanism in place, either prezygotic or postzygotic.

In general, a few thousand generations can conduct a fully separate species, with the right pressures. For humans, figure ~640,000 years based on 8,000 generations(currently).  For Fruit Flies, ~657 years, based on 8,000 generations.  All of this is contingent upon the right isolation mechanisms in place, as well.  (meaning no way to intermingle on a long term scale)

A breed is different from a species, btw Gyrene.  All dogs are the same species, Canis lupus familiaris, and can interbreed.  A poodle can reproduce with a great dane, though it's not necessarily recommended.  To become a new species, barriers to interbreeding and habitat must be put into place for many thousands of generations.  7 generations are not going to make a new species....and without an extreme amount of pressure, won't even make a specific trait recessive or dominant.
« Last Edit: April 28, 2010, 09:57:33 AM by MORAY37 »
"Ocean: A body of water occupying 2/3 of a world made for man...who has no gills."
-Ambrose Bierce