Author Topic: A-26 Invader  (Read 3291 times)

Offline Boozeman

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 482
Re: A-26 Invader
« Reply #45 on: May 03, 2010, 04:05:14 AM »
Just take a look at the numbers online at any single given day. The overwhelming majority are playing in LW. There for, a new late war monster would see much more use then yet another LW hanger queen. Amirite?

I think any late war monster left to be added would be perked, and so, quite limited in usage. Also, I'm in LW to fly hangar queens, so I would welcome some more of them, like the G.55.   

Offline Yossarian

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2516
Re: A-26 Invader
« Reply #46 on: May 03, 2010, 04:10:16 AM »
Just to say...the VOTE
Afk for a year or so.  The name of a gun turret in game.  Falanx, huh? :banana:
Apparently I'm in the 20th FG 'Loco Busters', or so the legend goes.
O o
/Ż________________________
| IMMA FIRIN' MAH 75MM!!!
\_ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ

Offline Kazaa

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8371
      • http://www.thefewsquadron.co.uk
Re: A-26 Invader
« Reply #47 on: May 03, 2010, 04:11:14 AM »
More perk rides FTW, I only had about 9,000 before I cancelled my account for the 3rd time.



"If you learn from defeat, you haven't really lost."

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Re: A-26 Invader
« Reply #48 on: May 03, 2010, 04:22:41 AM »
Just to say...the VOTE
What vote?

The vote to decide what the next plane to be added would be wherein the B-25 won by such a narrow margin over the P-39 that they added them both?  That vote?  That was for the next plane to be added.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Yossarian

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2516
Re: A-26 Invader
« Reply #49 on: May 03, 2010, 04:32:19 AM »
What vote?

The vote to decide what the next plane to be added would be wherein the B-25 won by such a narrow margin over the P-39 that they added them both?  That vote?  That was for the next plane to be added.

So why not just follow it down the list?
Afk for a year or so.  The name of a gun turret in game.  Falanx, huh? :banana:
Apparently I'm in the 20th FG 'Loco Busters', or so the legend goes.
O o
/Ż________________________
| IMMA FIRIN' MAH 75MM!!!
\_ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ

Offline Boozeman

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 482
Re: A-26 Invader
« Reply #50 on: May 03, 2010, 04:38:45 AM »
So why not just follow it down the list?

Maybe the plans and priorities changed over the last 3 years. The Brewster and the I-16 were not even on the list as far as I recall.

Offline Bronk

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9044
Re: A-26 Invader
« Reply #51 on: May 03, 2010, 05:17:07 AM »
Just take a look at the numbers online at any single given day. The overwhelming majority are playing in LW. There for, a new late war monster would see much more use then yet another LW hanger queen. Amirite?

Karnak,

Yak-3.
A-26.
B-29.
Meteor.
Me-410.
Spitfire Mk.21
Spitfire Mk. XII.

Just a few.
P-63 :noid
See Rule #4

Offline Yossarian

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2516
Re: A-26 Invader
« Reply #52 on: May 03, 2010, 07:39:31 AM »
Maybe the plans and priorities changed over the last 3 years. The Brewster and the I-16 were not even on the list as far as I recall.

I thought I heard that those were done as a sort of 'thank you' to the Finnish players of AH, who've contributed so much to the game?
Afk for a year or so.  The name of a gun turret in game.  Falanx, huh? :banana:
Apparently I'm in the 20th FG 'Loco Busters', or so the legend goes.
O o
/Ż________________________
| IMMA FIRIN' MAH 75MM!!!
\_ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ

Offline macdp51

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 92
Re: A-26 Invader
« Reply #53 on: May 03, 2010, 11:01:07 AM »
A-26 PLEASE  :bolt:
HP

Offline gyrene81

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11629
Re: A-26 Invader
« Reply #54 on: May 03, 2010, 11:04:54 AM »
Just take a look at the numbers online at any single given day. The overwhelming majority are playing in LW. There for, a new late war monster would see much more use then yet another LW hanger queen. Amirite?
Yeah, there are a lot more people in the LW arenas but that doesn't mean the overwhelming majority are flying late war aircraft...at any given time there are a large number of mid-war airplanes flying.


Again, what could be accomplished with the A-26 that can not currently be done with the A-20 or B-26?
jarhed  
Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day...
Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. - Terry Pratchett

Offline Mister Fork

  • AvA Staff Member
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7257
Re: A-26 Invader
« Reply #55 on: May 03, 2010, 11:06:02 AM »
+1 on the A-26.  Lets put it on the develop in the near future. :aok
"Games are meant to be fun and fair but fighting a war is neither." - HiTech

Offline 1carbine

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 237
Re: A-26 Invader
« Reply #56 on: May 03, 2010, 11:12:34 AM »
Yeah, there are a lot more people in the LW arenas but that doesn't mean the overwhelming majority are flying late war aircraft...at any given time there are a large number of mid-war airplanes flying.


Again, what could be accomplished with the A-26 that can not currently be done with the A-20 or B-26?

Umm 355mph. with more ord.
Obama is the Energizer bunny of fail.

_|o[____]o
[1---L-OllllllO-
()_)()_)=°°=)_)

Offline Yossarian

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2516
Re: A-26 Invader
« Reply #57 on: May 03, 2010, 11:15:45 AM »
Yeah, there are a lot more people in the LW arenas but that doesn't mean the overwhelming majority are flying late war aircraft...at any given time there are a large number of mid-war airplanes flying.


Again, what could be accomplished with the A-26 that can not currently be done with the A-20 or B-26?

Taking down two hangars in one pass?  Carrying 5-inch rockets (14 of them, according to one source) under the wings?  Being ~30mph faster, and also being the fastest American bomber of WWII?

But at the end of the day, this plane could easily be a perked bomber - and that's a good chunk of the reason why this should be added.  Another good chunk of it is that the people have spoken through that vote, and they said it should be added!



EDIT:
http://books.google.com/books?id=4CEDAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA80&dq=A-26+invader&ei=GvfeS_vGGKqkygSn_7j-CA&cd=4#v=onepage&q=A-26%20invader&f=false
« Last Edit: May 03, 2010, 11:32:30 AM by Yossarian »
Afk for a year or so.  The name of a gun turret in game.  Falanx, huh? :banana:
Apparently I'm in the 20th FG 'Loco Busters', or so the legend goes.
O o
/Ż________________________
| IMMA FIRIN' MAH 75MM!!!
\_ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ

Offline gyrene81

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11629
Re: A-26 Invader
« Reply #58 on: May 03, 2010, 11:32:04 AM »
So what would be the balancing plane that would be added with it? Doesn't seem like anyone has taken that into consideration. And another perked bomber is really needed...ok if you say so.

News flash...there are 8 U.S./British bombers capable of carrying enough ord to drop 2 or more hangars in 1 pass...and one of them is a highly capable dive bomber...they are all well armed. The A-26 has no better armament than the A-20.

There are 11 highly capable U.S./British fast attack fighter/bombers...all of which carry enough ord to drop at least one hangar and are more than capable of fighting their way in and out.



Compare that to what is currently available for all of the other countries combined...when coming up with some new aircraft that would be "cool to fly"...try getting some priorities that include making AH something besides Fly U.S.A.
jarhed  
Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day...
Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. - Terry Pratchett

Offline RipChord929

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1022
Re: A-26 Invader
« Reply #59 on: May 03, 2010, 12:17:03 PM »
In the 4yrs I've been flying AH, I have flown A20 more than any other... The main limiting factor on A20 is the old prewar airframe.. It wants to go faster than the airframe will tolerate, if you do, things break and it starts shedding parts.. Thats why Douglas took all their wartime experience with A20, and all its upgrades.. And poured it into a new plane, the A26.. It won't shed parts like A20!
And it will have WAY higher dive speeds, will sustain them longer with its slicker airframe.. This will make it far easier to zip in to a target quick, far harder to catch them, and far more survivable all around.. Late war fighter guys don't like that idea.. :cry

 :salute RC
"Well Cmdr Eddington, looks like we have ourselves a war..."
"Yeah, a gut bustin, mother lovin, NAVY war!!!"