« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3 4   Go Down

Author Topic: 109G-10  (Read 2225 times)

Offline dirt911

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 435
109G-10
« on: May 15, 2010, 12:20:52 PM »
I heard something about a G-10 Gustav wondered if it was a good model for AH,if so i think it would be a nice fit between G-6 and G-14.
Logged

Offline AWwrgwy

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5478
Re: 109G-10
« Reply #1 on: May 15, 2010, 12:42:12 PM »
Quote from: dirt911 on May 15, 2010, 12:20:52 PM
I heard something about a G-10 Gustav wondered if it was a good model for AH,if so i think it would be a nice fit between G-6 and G-14.

Why?  Because 10 is between 6 and 14?

Search

Quote from: Kieren on March 16, 2000, 07:44:00 PM
I think (based on Green's work) that I read that the K-4 was a standardization of all the field fixes. So there might be very little difference between a G10 and K4.


wrongway
Logged
71 (Eagle) Squadron
"THAT"S PAINT!!"

"If nothing else works, a total pig-headed unwillingness to look facts in the face will see us through."
- General Sir Anthony Cecil Hogmanay

Offline dirt911

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 435
Re: 109G-10
« Reply #2 on: May 15, 2010, 12:45:17 PM »
N0,performance.

Check your engine and weight specs.
« Last Edit: May 15, 2010, 12:52:18 PM by dirt911 »
Logged

Offline EDO43

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 271
Re: 109G-10
« Reply #3 on: May 15, 2010, 01:26:16 PM »
we had the G-10, it became the K-4. 
Logged
Mawey -a-  tsmukan

Offline dirt911

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 435
Re: 109G-10
« Reply #4 on: May 15, 2010, 01:59:47 PM »
They are two sepearte aircraft K-4 is a later model 109. :rolleyes:
Logged

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Re: 109G-10
« Reply #5 on: May 15, 2010, 02:43:56 PM »
Bf109G-10 entered service after the Bf109K-4.  G-10 is a hodgepodge of fixes for the G series basically.  Due to its service entry date it isn't very useful for AH.  A Bf109G-6/AS or Bf109G-14/AS would be very nice though.
Logged
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline dirt911

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 435
Re: 109G-10
« Reply #6 on: May 15, 2010, 03:07:33 PM »
Quote from: Karnak on May 15, 2010, 02:43:56 PM
Bf109G-10 entered service after the Bf109K-4.  G-10 is a hodgepodge of fixes for the G series basically.  Due to its service entry date it isn't very useful for AH.  A Bf109G-6/AS or Bf109G-14/AS would be very nice though.
Now that i think about it i would much rather see G-14/AS added.
Logged

Offline curry1

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2321
Re: 109G-10
« Reply #7 on: May 15, 2010, 03:09:52 PM »
Quote from: dirt911 on May 15, 2010, 03:07:33 PM
Now that i think about it i would much rather see G-14/AS added.

No changing you mind! :furious
Logged
Curry1-Since Tour 101

Offline Mus51

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 482
Re: 109G-10
« Reply #8 on: May 15, 2010, 04:01:12 PM »
+1 on the G-10
Logged
Regards,


DutchGuy

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Re: 109G-10
« Reply #9 on: May 15, 2010, 04:02:24 PM »
Quote from: Mus51 on May 15, 2010, 04:01:12 PM
+1 on the G-10
Why?  Its useless to AH.
Logged
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: 109G-10
« Reply #10 on: May 15, 2010, 04:36:02 PM »
Even the best G10s were about 10mph slower than the K4, and the G10s varied depending on the setup of the plane. Gee, the G14 we already have in-game is only about 20mph slower than a K4. A G10 (the best of the G10s, that is) would only be a handful of MPH faster than the G14 (the more average G10s would only perform as well as the G14 does). And have exactly the same weapons options. Only difference would be above 17k. Again, worse than the K4 we have, it would continue on for higher than the G14 before falling off.

As mentioned so many times by other people, it saw service AFTER the K4, and performed WORSE than the K4. It fills no niche, plugs no holes. The AS models would be much more suitable.
Logged

Offline dirt911

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 435
Re: 109G-10
« Reply #11 on: May 15, 2010, 05:11:15 PM »
Quote from: curry1 on May 15, 2010, 03:09:52 PM
No changing you mind! :furious

Aint no rule saying i caint change my mind. :neener: :P :banana:
Logged

Offline grizz441

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7000
Re: 109G-10
« Reply #12 on: May 15, 2010, 06:48:27 PM »
Quote from: Karnak on May 15, 2010, 04:02:24 PM
Why?  Its useless to AH.

On the same token, you could make some very minor changes to the K4, add a couple skins and bam you got a new plane.  Not much effort would have to be put in to add it.
Logged

Offline Mus51

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 482
Re: 109G-10
« Reply #13 on: May 15, 2010, 07:20:38 PM »
Quote from: grizz441 on May 15, 2010, 06:48:27 PM
On the same token, you could make some very minor changes to the K4, add a couple skins and bam you got a new plane.  Not much effort would have to be put in to add it.

My thoughts exactly! I already came across Erich Hartmann's bird:
http://ttp://www.taphilo.com/photo/pictures/Me109-G10.jpg


« Last Edit: May 15, 2010, 07:23:35 PM by Mus51 »
Logged
Regards,


DutchGuy

Offline Bayland 2

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 17
Re: 109G-10
« Reply #14 on: May 15, 2010, 07:40:52 PM »
and uh dirt... sorry to break it to you but there is a rule saying you cant change the topic so, yeah, ya started talking about the G10, now ya want the G14 so, yeah, sorry bud but U R WRONG, WHAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x jk though the G14 would be much nicer
Logged

Bayland- 82nd Fighter Group
~97th Fighter Squadron~
Pages: [1] 2 3 4   Go Up
« previous next »