Author Topic: What He-111 would be best for AH.  (Read 2233 times)

Offline Beefcake

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2285
What He-111 would be best for AH.
« on: May 20, 2010, 04:48:10 PM »
Lately I've been coming to terms with the fact that AH needs another Axis bomber, and I REALLY want to fly an He-111 in BOB.  :)

So with that in mind I'd like to ask what model of the He-111 would be best for AH? I know some versions had 20mm guns for defense which would be great for the MA.
Retired Bomber Dweeb - 71 "Eagle" Squadron RAF

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Re: What He-111 would be best for AH.
« Reply #1 on: May 20, 2010, 04:55:47 PM »
No He111 is going to be good for the LW MA.  It was obsolete by 1942 and the more they added on to it to try to compensate just made it slower and more vulnerable.

For a LW MA bomber the Germans really have three options, the Do217E, He177A-5 and the Ju188A.


The He111 would have a great place in scenarios and the early war environments.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: What He-111 would be best for AH.
« Reply #2 on: May 20, 2010, 08:30:46 PM »
Do 217 wasn't all that vital as a LW bomber. More often than not it was used as maritime recon, recon, and night fighter. I'm personally opposed to the He177 because it would be completely without flaws in AH, when there was better than even chance you'd burn up after takeoff in the real thing. It was a severely flawed and dangerous aircraft, with a prolonged teething period, and in AH that would be gone making it artificially far superior to the real thing.

I won't hide the fact that I want the Ju188, though. :) I may be biased.

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Re: What He-111 would be best for AH.
« Reply #3 on: May 20, 2010, 08:59:02 PM »
Ju188A would be my preference as well.  By a long shot.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: What He-111 would be best for AH.
« Reply #4 on: May 21, 2010, 12:14:15 AM »
On the other hand.....


.... who says we can't have them all?  :noid

Offline bozon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6037
Re: What He-111 would be best for AH.
« Reply #5 on: May 21, 2010, 03:28:09 AM »
He177 is the one that is likely to see regular use in late war. If Karnak's concerns are a real issue, they can be addressed by a symbolic perk tag. Bomber perks are cheaper than ice in Greenland and will not truly limit anyone, except for the psychological effect.

Ju188 is nice, but is it a great improvement over the current Ju88 which is not the first model?
Mosquito VI - twice the spitfire, four times the ENY.

Click!>> "So, you want to fly the wooden wonder" - <<click!
the almost incomplete and not entirely inaccurate guide to the AH Mosquito.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RGOWswdzGQs

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Re: What He-111 would be best for AH.
« Reply #6 on: May 21, 2010, 03:31:47 AM »
Yes, I would say a bomber with the same bomb load having a top speed of ~335mph and defended by heavier guns, including an MG151/20 in the top turret which, unlike the Ki-67's, has full 360 degree rotation is a great improvement.

The Ju88's airframe is actually pretty durable in AH.  Add in the speed and guns and it would be a good package.

The Ju188 is also a great looking bomber.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Beefcake

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2285
Re: What He-111 would be best for AH.
« Reply #7 on: May 21, 2010, 03:31:37 PM »
After looking up some info I would agree on the Ju188.
Retired Bomber Dweeb - 71 "Eagle" Squadron RAF

Offline Angus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10057
Re: What He-111 would be best for AH.
« Reply #8 on: May 23, 2010, 03:49:00 PM »
Ju 188 like a crazy looking Ju88...on steroids. Was a good aircraft.
The 111 would be a bit of a hangar queen in the MA I think, the Ju88 we have is simply better.
Was used launching V-1's over sea at low alt, which would be a fun twist, - but again,  then we'd need a V-1.
Was durable, and could carry quite a bit though. And the look and view ...ohhh...nice ;)
I'd vote for it, -but then we need more of BoB'ing. Finally BoB would have the main axis bomber.
It was very interesting to carry out the flight trials at Rechlin with the Spitfire and the Hurricane. Both types are very simple to fly compared to our aircraft, and childishly easy to take-off and land. (Werner Mölders)

Offline bravoa8

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1571
Re: What He-111 would be best for AH.
« Reply #9 on: May 23, 2010, 11:43:55 PM »
I want this. :D A Mistel.


Offline AWwrgwy

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5478
Re: What He-111 would be best for AH.
« Reply #10 on: May 24, 2010, 01:50:21 PM »
I want this. :D A Mistel.

(Image removed from quote.)

And, it counts as two kills.

 :devil


wrongway
71 (Eagle) Squadron
"THAT"S PAINT!!"

"If nothing else works, a total pig-headed unwillingness to look facts in the face will see us through."
- General Sir Anthony Cecil Hogmanay

Offline save

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2873
Re: What He-111 would be best for AH.
« Reply #11 on: May 24, 2010, 01:59:25 PM »
Trying to do BOB without the DO17 and the HE111 shifts the scenario balance totally in favour of the Axis (ju88s)



My ammo last for 6 Lancasters, or one Yak3.
"And the Yak 3 ,aka the "flying Yamato"..."
-Caldera

Offline allaire

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1239
Re: What He-111 would be best for AH.
« Reply #12 on: June 01, 2010, 01:37:09 PM »
We need the HE 111 zwilling.   :noid
"I drank what?" -Socrates

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: What He-111 would be best for AH.
« Reply #13 on: June 01, 2010, 01:42:03 PM »
Yes, because a plane that didn't carry any bombs, and was designed solely for the purpose of towing the largest gliders of WW2, is really what AH needs, eh?

Offline Die Hard

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2205
Re: What He-111 would be best for AH.
« Reply #14 on: June 02, 2010, 10:44:02 PM »
Do 217 wasn't all that vital as a LW bomber. More often than not it was used as maritime recon, recon, and night fighter. I'm personally opposed to the He177 because it would be completely without flaws in AH, when there was better than even chance you'd burn up after takeoff in the real thing. It was a severely flawed and dangerous aircraft, with a prolonged teething period, and in AH that would be gone making it artificially far superior to the real thing.

I won't hide the fact that I want the Ju188, though. :) I may be biased.

The main production model, the A-5, did not have any significant vices. It was the most survivable LW bomber during the Baby Blitz with a 10% loss ratio. The other LW bombers suffered losses in excess of 60%. The He 177A-5 was also successful on the eastern front and operated almost with impunity, flying high and fast.
It is better to be violent, if there is violence in our hearts, than to put on the cloak of nonviolence to cover impotence.

-Gandhi