Author Topic: What He-111 would be best for AH.  (Read 2230 times)

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: What He-111 would be best for AH.
« Reply #15 on: June 03, 2010, 01:01:25 AM »
Loss ratio is directly tied in with how and how many were used, FYI. Mossie had a super low loss ratio, but that's because they used them for geurilla tactics, sneak attacks, never staged a frontal war. Had they flown in level at alt like US bombers they would have been slaughtered. Even the RAF thought they should never be used to dogfight.

Like you say, over the eastern front it had no opposition, so how do you think that affects loss ratios? :)

Offline Die Hard

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2205
Re: What He-111 would be best for AH.
« Reply #16 on: June 03, 2010, 08:50:19 AM »
Loss ratio is directly tied in with how and how many were used, FYI. Mossie had a super low loss ratio, but that's because they used them for geurilla tactics, sneak attacks, never staged a frontal war. Had they flown in level at alt like US bombers they would have been slaughtered. Even the RAF thought they should never be used to dogfight.

Like you say, over the eastern front it had no opposition, so how do you think that affects loss ratios? :)

The loss ratio would have been far more than 10% if "there was better than even chance you'd burn up after takeoff". The Greif is historically lamented for its early stability and engine problems, but the fact is that by the A-5 model these problems were ironed out and the He 177 had proved itself to be the most technically advanced bomber of the Luftwaffe. The RAF were impressed by the postwar tests on the He 177 A-5 and the single long-range He 177 A-7 they captured. Another very advanced bomber, the B-29, also had a reputation for catching fire, and also took two years to have its problems ironed out, after which it became one of the most successful bombers of aviation history. Unlike the B-29 the He 177 never got the chance to show its full potential due to the misfortunes of war.

He 177 A-1
First production series, 130 built. Stability problems. Engine problems.

He 177 A-3
    Second production series, 170 built. Sixteenth and subsequent aircraft powered by DB 610 A/B engines. Engine problems. Structural problems.

He 177 A-5
    Main production series, 826 built. Strengthened wing, shortened undercarriage oleo legs, increase in maximum external bomb load.

Those 300 A-1's and A-3's are largely responsible for the Greif's unfavorable reputation.
It is better to be violent, if there is violence in our hearts, than to put on the cloak of nonviolence to cover impotence.

-Gandhi

Offline bozon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6037
Re: What He-111 would be best for AH.
« Reply #17 on: June 03, 2010, 09:47:02 AM »
Loss ratio is directly tied in with how and how many were used, FYI. Mossie had a super low loss ratio, but that's because they used them for geurilla tactics, sneak attacks, never staged a frontal war. Had they flown in level at alt like US bombers they would have been slaughtered. Even the RAF thought they should never be used to dogfight.
Mosquito bombers were not mainly used for guerrilla tactics. They were used as high alt level bombers just like the other RAF bombers and flying with their stream (overtaking it). One major point is that the RAF was bombing at night and at their speeds they were incredibly hard to intercept by night fighters - fighters could not creep up on them from behind like it is normally done at night because the closure rate was so small it took forever - if at all.

The low lost rate for the B. Mossies was a combination of escaping night fighters and mostly due flak avoidance - twice the speed means half the time spent in the acks. Half the size means quarter the area to be hit by acks.

RAF was incredibly short sighted regarding the mosquito, as a bomber and a fighter. With costal command mosquitoes were often escorted by Mustangs, but gradually the escort was dropped and the mosquitoes were escorting themselves and the Beaufighters. In a few engagements with 109/190s, even starting from a disadvantageous position and not primarily trained to dogfight they more than held their own. Not that it was the ultimate dogfighter, but it should not be understimated.


Mosquito VI - twice the spitfire, four times the ENY.

Click!>> "So, you want to fly the wooden wonder" - <<click!
the almost incomplete and not entirely inaccurate guide to the AH Mosquito.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RGOWswdzGQs

Offline Guppy35

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 20386
Re: What He-111 would be best for AH.
« Reply #18 on: June 03, 2010, 03:17:09 PM »


RAF was incredibly short sighted regarding the mosquito, as a bomber and a fighter. With costal command mosquitoes were often escorted by Mustangs, but gradually the escort was dropped and the mosquitoes were escorting themselves and the Beaufighters. In a few engagements with 109/190s, even starting from a disadvantageous position and not primarily trained to dogfight they more than held their own. Not that it was the ultimate dogfighter, but it should not be understimated.




Don't believe thats accurate regarding escort.  Initially in 43 Beaus escorted Beaus.  When Mossies came to Coastal Command they initially escorted Beaus but it was determined it wasn't effective.  Mustangs then escorted both although never in great numbers.  They did not lose that escort once they got them although there was talk of it at times.  315 Squadron was first in Mustang IIIs then 19 and 65 squadron got the job with Mustang IVs.  4th FG USAAF also escorted them on one occasion.

Suggest taking a look at "A Separate Little War" about the Banff Strike Wing which was Mossies for the most part.  Dalachy had the Beaus.

As for He111s.  Adding it would mean adding the B of B version.  In terms of the MA, no one is going to live long behind all that glass in the nose and one little mg for defense.  We sure could use it for the B of B scenario, but survivability without escort would be non-existent in the MA
Dan/CorkyJr
8th FS "Headhunters

Offline Die Hard

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2205
Re: What He-111 would be best for AH.
« Reply #19 on: June 03, 2010, 03:58:14 PM »
He 111H-3 for BoB. He 111H-16 for 1943 Eastern Front and Mediterranean scenarios. He 111H-20 (the last major production model) for 1944 Eastern Front scenarios.

It is better to be violent, if there is violence in our hearts, than to put on the cloak of nonviolence to cover impotence.

-Gandhi

Offline allaire

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1239
Re: What He-111 would be best for AH.
« Reply #20 on: June 04, 2010, 10:50:33 AM »
Yes, because a plane that didn't carry any bombs, and was designed solely for the purpose of towing the largest gliders of WW2, is really what AH needs, eh?
But it had five engines man would make the perfect recon plane.  Na can't keep the jokes up under krusty's need to point out the obvious.
"I drank what?" -Socrates

Offline hlbly

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1013
Re: What He-111 would be best for AH.
« Reply #21 on: June 04, 2010, 05:51:52 PM »
Don't believe thats accurate regarding escort.  Initially in 43 Beaus escorted Beaus.  When Mossies came to Coastal Command they initially escorted Beaus but it was determined it wasn't effective.  Mustangs then escorted both although never in great numbers.  They did not lose that escort once they got them although there was talk of it at times.  315 Squadron was first in Mustang IIIs then 19 and 65 squadron got the job with Mustang IVs.  4th FG USAAF also escorted them on one occasion.

Suggest taking a look at "A Separate Little War" about the Banff Strike Wing which was Mossies for the most part.  Dalachy had the Beaus.

As for He111s.  Adding it would mean adding the B of B version.  In terms of the MA, no one is going to live long behind all that glass in the nose and one little mg for defense.  We sure could use it for the B of B scenario, but survivability without escort would be non-existent in the MA
I think my local librarian is begining to hate you Dan  ;) We recently got a new one . Part of the local bond measure required library staff to make earnest efforts to aquire books requested by members . It was in response to public perception <accurate btw> that the library aquired books requested by a small minority of the users that represented a large portion of private donations , it only amounted to a very small portion of the total budget . While our taxes got us no consideration their little donations got them front door keys . Keep the recommendations coming . The section containing WW2 aviation history books is becoming quite respectable . This section is also becoming one of the largest contributors to the oregon interlibrary loan program . You can also now find some good fantasy books in our fiction section . A genre that is looked upon with disdain by the "elite" that never the less is popular with us common tax paying scum .

Offline bravoa8

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1571
Re: What He-111 would be best for AH.
« Reply #22 on: June 04, 2010, 09:41:07 PM »
We need the HE 111 zwilling.   :noid
:aok

Offline ElGuapo1

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 150
      • http://www.yoursheephaverugburns
Re: What He-111 would be best for AH.
« Reply #23 on: June 08, 2010, 09:04:45 PM »
JU-188 T....look at the performance :aok

Offline BrownBaron

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1832
Re: What He-111 would be best for AH.
« Reply #24 on: June 08, 2010, 09:14:19 PM »
Yes, because a plane that didn't carry any bombs, and was designed solely for the purpose of towing the largest gliders of WW2, is really what AH needs, eh?

I'm sure you can't be reffering to the 111...please oh please tell me you're kidding.  :confused:
O Jagdgeschwader 77

Ingame ID: Johannes

Offline allaire

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1239
Re: What He-111 would be best for AH.
« Reply #25 on: June 08, 2010, 09:43:39 PM »
I'm sure you can't be reffering to the 111...please oh please tell me you're kidding.  :confused:
The 111z was designed and built to launch the Me-231.
"I drank what?" -Socrates

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: What He-111 would be best for AH.
« Reply #26 on: June 10, 2010, 07:46:28 PM »
The 111z was designed and built to launch the Me-231.

And was so bad at it they ended up sticking engines onto the glider itself, making it self-propelled.

Offline Angus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10057
Re: What He-111 would be best for AH.
« Reply #27 on: June 15, 2010, 08:20:46 AM »
Ahoi Bozon:
"RAF was incredibly short sighted regarding the mosquito, as a bomber and a fighter. With costal command mosquitoes were often escorted by Mustangs, but gradually the escort was dropped and the mosquitoes were escorting themselves and the Beaufighters. In a few engagements with 109/190s, even starting from a disadvantageous position and not primarily trained to dogfight they more than held their own. Not that it was the ultimate dogfighter, but it should not be understimated."
Just FYI, an old Mustang stick told me that escorting the Mossie was quite a silly thing because they cruised so fast and could hold their own. He was in awe about them.
It was very interesting to carry out the flight trials at Rechlin with the Spitfire and the Hurricane. Both types are very simple to fly compared to our aircraft, and childishly easy to take-off and land. (Werner Mölders)

Offline Simba

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 725
Re: What He-111 would be best for AH.
« Reply #28 on: June 19, 2010, 07:54:19 AM »
The best He 111 variant for AH would be the versatile H-6; it served in great numbers on all fronts, both as a bomber and torpedo-bomber.

And I rather like the KG26 'Lion' badge.

 :cool:
Simba
No.6 Squadron vRFC/RAF