Author Topic: Aircraft in aces high II  (Read 9903 times)

Offline Bronk

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9044
Re: Aircraft in aces high II
« Reply #15 on: June 02, 2010, 05:20:45 AM »
Ok now I am confused? What produces thrust or in this case more thrust if not the engine??  I are NOT an engineer :huh
Prop pitch ?
See Rule #4

Offline phatzo

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3734
      • No Crying
Re: Aircraft in aces high II
« Reply #16 on: June 02, 2010, 05:25:27 AM »
and torque
No thank you Turkish, I'm sweet enough.

Offline Kazaa

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8371
      • http://www.thefewsquadron.co.uk
Re: Aircraft in aces high II
« Reply #17 on: June 02, 2010, 05:39:53 AM »
"1kg object needs 3 times its weight to counteract gravity."




"If you learn from defeat, you haven't really lost."

Offline MoJoRiZn

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 50
Re: Aircraft in aces high II
« Reply #18 on: June 02, 2010, 07:01:59 AM »
and torque

wouldn't that be only static thrust against the fuselage of the aircraft?  not a type of thrust that would actualy help the aircraft, yet a type of thrust that the propeller would have to overcome to move forward?
"Well, I woke up this morning, and got myself a beer
the future's uncertain, and the end is always near     Let it roll"

Offline hitech

  • Administrator
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 12404
      • http://www.hitechcreations.com
Re: Aircraft in aces high II
« Reply #19 on: June 02, 2010, 10:02:26 AM »
Boxboy in physics terms you have a few concepts.

Force I assume you know, this is measured in pounds or newtons. Thrust is a force.

Work is = Force * Distance.

Power = Work / Time.

Speed =   Distance / Time.

Solving these equations we also get

Power = force * speed.


So in airplane terms lets ignore drag for a sec.

Once an airplane is accelerated to flying speed it requires no force to continue flying but the plane is still generating lift and hence requires no power to continue flying level but is still generating lift. Now picture a helicopter with no drag, once the rotors are accelerated they would continue to provide thrust/lift with out any power.

Now with drag and flying level all power is simply used in overcoming drag. Power required is force (i.e. drag) * speed.


But the key is the power definition. of Force * speed.

So now to calculate power for climb speed we simply need the weight of object and speed of climb to calculate power required. I.E. Power = Weight * speed.
Horse powers definition is Lifting 550 pounds 1 foot in 1 sec.
But if we put in a gear box or lever we could be lifting 1100 lbs 1 foot in 2 secs with the exact same power.

So angle of climb is all about a propeller and plane design. A helicopter climbing straight up requires no more extra power then an airplane with the same weight  if they climb at the same rate.

So to summarize why i pointed the thrust / power out. Not to many engineers would substitute the word power for force when describing what is required for angle of climb.

HiTech
 












Offline LLogann

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4947
      • Candidz.com
Re: Aircraft in aces high II
« Reply #20 on: June 02, 2010, 11:28:05 AM »
Don't forget Engine Dynamics young man!!!! 


WOW, you're going to get blasted, if you haven't already. 

Time to read the replies......   :rock
See Rule #4
Now I only pay because of my friends.

Offline gyrene81

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11629
Re: Aircraft in aces high II
« Reply #21 on: June 02, 2010, 11:35:31 AM »
Anyone want to make a bet that the "aircraft engineer" OP doesn't post a reply until after school is out and he's finished with dinner/homework?
jarhed  
Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day...
Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. - Terry Pratchett

Offline LLogann

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4947
      • Candidz.com
Re: Aircraft in aces high II
« Reply #22 on: June 02, 2010, 11:55:55 AM »
Actually.....  Rereading him, he states "airframe engineer" but also made it two words..........   :headscratch:

Anyone want to make a bet that the "aircraft engineer" OP doesn't post a reply until after school is out and he's finished with dinner/homework?
See Rule #4
Now I only pay because of my friends.

Offline AKH

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 514
Re: Aircraft in aces high II
« Reply #23 on: June 02, 2010, 01:17:52 PM »
Engineer must be one of the most abused terms of the last century.  Do anything slightly technical and you have an instant right to call yourself an engineer.



TV repairman? No - he's a TV engineer!
AKHoopy Arabian Knights
google koan: "Your assumptions about the lives of others are in direct relation to your naïve pomposity."

Offline gyrene81

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11629
Re: Aircraft in aces high II
« Reply #24 on: June 02, 2010, 01:42:44 PM »
Sanitation Engineer

jarhed  
Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day...
Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. - Terry Pratchett

Offline WMLute

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4512
Re: Aircraft in aces high II
« Reply #25 on: June 02, 2010, 01:53:03 PM »
Actually.....  Rereading him, he states "airframe engineer" but also made it two words..........   :headscratch:



yeah, I caught that too.

when "pretending" to be something, it really helps if you spell it correctly.
"Never tell people how to do things. Tell them what to do and they will surprise you with their ingenuity."
— George Patton

Absurdum est ut alios regat, qui seipsum regere nescit

Offline dtango

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1702
Re: Aircraft in aces high II
« Reply #26 on: June 02, 2010, 02:26:13 PM »
I understand what BulletVI is trying to say though it would help if he provided more specificity (yes that's a word!).  HT's responses to BulletVI, I can understand because HT know's what he's talking about.  Some of you guys piling on however ....hmmmm ;).

BulletVI:

Your answer lies in understanding the following relationships and as they change with respect to time.

For an ACCELERATED climb (forward airspeed not constant) the forces along the direction of flight can be expressed as:

F = Thrust – Drag – Weight * sin (climb_angle)

Since weight = mass * gravity we can subsitute in the equation above thus becoming

F = Thrust - Drag - Mass * gravity * sin(climb_angle)

In your Tempest, A6M, Spit8 example you were focused on the effect of gravity.  The greater the climb_angle, the greater the effect of weight / gravity on the overall forces.  But that's only one of variables.  Thrust and Drag play a part as well.  Ignore them at your peril ;).  Be very careful of oversimplifying the dynamics because it will bite you in the butt.

Another way to look at an accelerated climb is this..

Specific Excess Power (Ps) = (T - D) / W * V = (change_in_alt + change_in_airspeed)

Hope that gets you on your way to understanding!

Tango
412th FS Braunco Mustangs
« Last Edit: June 02, 2010, 02:31:14 PM by dtango »
Tango / Tango412 412th FS Braunco Mustangs
"At times it seems like people think they can chuck bunch of anecdotes into some converter which comes up with the flight model." (Wmaker)

Offline Boxboy

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 740
Re: Aircraft in aces high II
« Reply #27 on: June 02, 2010, 02:42:38 PM »
Thanks Hitech for clearing that up, it has been a long time since I really thought about math problems and such.  I completely forgot about levers, pullys, and such and their effect on things for the same effort.
Sub Lt BigJim
801 Sqn FAA
Pilot

Offline SlapShot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9121
Re: Aircraft in aces high II
« Reply #28 on: June 04, 2010, 10:28:13 AM »

Hope that gets you on your way to understanding!


I strongly doubt it.
SlapShot - Blue Knights

Guppy: "The only risk we take is the fight, and since no one really dies, the reward is the fight."

Offline redcatcherb412

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 610
Re: Aircraft in aces high II
« Reply #29 on: June 04, 2010, 12:22:51 PM »
All I know is no matter what plane I pick, I never can climb up fast enough to an enemy before he gets me in his dive, or catch up to bombers. Stall it every time. Course I wuz a ground grunt so flying the planes is just plain fun for me.
Ground Pounders ...