Hmm we have a logic problem here.
Its part of the game and ok to fly anyway you want "fly your way" lets not act like we want anyone to "fly our way" or fly with a general standard.
Yet there is one way that is better than the rest to respond to it. Hey text the way I think is best.
I say the emperor is naked.
I say whether we can agree on it or not there is a "right" way to do both. Humans do have built in standards to what is right fair just and the like.
Your not going to <S> a tard for pickpocketing your wallet. Are you. After all he is living life the way he wants too.
You are asserting this idea when you claim there is a better way to respond to someones behavior in the game.
The rule set should apply to the guy that is "flying the way he wants to."
I dont get it. We can improve the game play by better responses on the text buffer, "but" it is acceptable to fly anyway you want.
It is possible to fly any half witted way a player wants to. Yes. Well almost that is why the have kill shooter on and the like. Because there is a standard the raises the level of play for most. Is it acceptable. NO> and I will choose to let the other person know it.
All this amounts to is <S> someone for possible bad behavior.
IF there is a right way or a standard to use the text buffer. Then the same applies to how we engage the other players in the arenas by how we fly.
The problem is there is no way to enforce it nor should there be by the players. Because there is no formal agreement on right play.
Yet the TEXT buffer is the only way to let someone know hey that is possible but its not acceptable.
I will text someone when "I" think it should be done. A to encourage what I think is a better way. It cant stop anyone from playing their way it might encourage them the "raise the level of play for all" though.
Sonic's post is a perfect example of "typical" AH arena mentality. Regardless of how fundamentally retarded he's going to appear, he spends x amount of time typing out a response that illustrates his cranial inadequacy for all who read it.
No one said you should not express your displeasure at a personally defined act of "lame behavior", however, the message Bagrat is passing on is that
Aces High is just a game and no amount of time wasted typing ridiculous diatribes that flash across the text buffer does anything more than illustrate a persons under developed cranium for all to see. It is
a game and not one person playing it can remember a time when personally defined "lame behavior" did not occur within the environment of
the game. Nor can they remember a time when someone did not visually express their displeasure in the form of text buffer rants within
the game. What is oft forgotten in the full cycle of a single day, is that not one single event in Aces High is going to make a difference to anyone in or out of
the game whose IQ is higher than their shoe size.
