Lots of good comments. Lots of rude and self indulgent comments made by players who are totally ignorant as to what I am looking at in this FSO. More to the point, they probably don't care because it is not fun for them. So be it. I am looking out for the fun of the whole, not just those that quit.
About six months ago we received some new tools from HTC. New icons ranges and tower only radar. Since that time they have hardly been used. My decision to go with the shorter icon range for enemy and the no icon range below 500 feet has nothing to do with if I like it or if it would be more 'fun' for the players. I am looking at the '
survivability' of the players to see if having a shorter enemy icon range made a difference. That is if a shorter enemy icon range = a higher % of players that land. Over the past month when I first decided to do this I have looked at many FSO's and FSO frames. The percents this year in a frame range from only 21% landing to as high as 64% landing. Last Friday we had about 43% land. By in large 40% to 45% landing is pretty much the average for an FSO frame. I was wondering if the shorter icon range would increase the percent that land, but it looks like it will not make a difference.
This is stupidity taken to the ultimate.
Oh no, I have done things much more stupid than this.
Having said that I fully understand that just 'surviving' an FSO frame does not make it fun. There are a lot of other factors involved. I get that, and look a those too.
For those of you that don't enjoy it, but stick it out I apologize and I appreciate your efforts to help us improve FSO.
For those that quit. Adios!