Author Topic: New divebomber  (Read 1990 times)

Offline STXAce8

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 724
Re: New divebomber
« Reply #30 on: July 21, 2010, 08:30:01 AM »
if i recall reading somwhere pilots that flew the SBD HATED the helldiver.....somthing about ripping the tail section off when pulling up from a dive  :noid


I believe that was fixed in a later version of it.
ZLA- Don't Focke Wulf Us!
Ingame: Batz
Kommando Nowotny
Its over the top as Fack

Offline Greebo

  • Skinner Team
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7009
Re: New divebomber
« Reply #31 on: July 21, 2010, 08:51:22 AM »
I'd say go with the Judy as it is a lot more useful scenario wise. The Helldiver has the F4U, F6F and TBM that can sub for it whereas the IJN have no late war attack aircraft. No dive bomber's going to see a lot of use in the MA, but the Judy's much higher top speed might make up for its flammability compared to the Ju 87, SBD or Val. It was very maneuverable too and might appeal to those masochists who like to up Vals as fighters.  :D

Offline DEECONX

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1502
Re: New divebomber
« Reply #32 on: July 21, 2010, 09:13:32 AM »
I'd say go with the Judy as it is a lot more useful scenario wise. The Helldiver has the F4U, F6F and TBM that can sub for it whereas the IJN have no late war attack aircraft. No dive bomber's going to see a lot of use in the MA, but the Judy's much higher top speed might make up for its flammability compared to the Ju 87, SBD or Val. It was very maneuverable too and might appeal to those masochists who like to up Vals as fighters.  :D


Why not both?  :aok

Offline Volron

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5805
Re: New divebomber
« Reply #33 on: July 21, 2010, 04:50:01 PM »
Well you know me, I prefer the early to the later.  I'm much prefer a B17E or F to the G and a B24D would be just fine :)
 
I'd also like a map of the Southwest Pacific covering Australia New Guiniea, Rabaul and the Solomons so we could fight that time in the war.  Give me Bettys and Oscars, the occasional Dinah for the Japanese.  I'll need my RAAF Beaufighters to go with the RAAF P40Es and Spit V

Put me at the historical base for the 80th Headhunters at that time and lets have at it.  I'd love to have a map that allowed me to see the historical terrain and to permit the most immersion flying possible.

Wonder if we could get enough guys to move into the other roles needed for A20 and B25CStrafer pilots, C47 drivers, P39s, P40s

A couple of good runs to Rabaul would be fun too.

Wonder if anyone else would want to play out that kind of tour :)

That...would...ROCK!  :rock


Why not both?  :aok

Toss in the TBD Devastator and you have yourself a deal.   :airplane:  Either way, you still have a deal. :x
Quote from: hitech
Wow I find it hard to believe it has been almost 38 days since our last path. We should have release another 38 versions by now  :bhead
HiTech
Quote from: Pyro
Quote from: Jolly
What on Earth makes you think that i said that sir?!
My guess would be scotch.

Offline Simba

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 725
Re: New divebomber
« Reply #34 on: July 23, 2010, 04:28:49 PM »
SB2C = Son of a Beech, Second Class.

And, while the dear ol' Barracuda could haul a good load, it took a l-o-n-g time to gain any altitude at maximum load. Mind you, it was gloriously ugly, especially when folded for storage, when that great RN pilot Eric 'Winkle' Brown described it as having all the appearance of having suffered a nasty accident.

 :cool:
Simba
No.6 Squadron vRFC/RAF

Offline Stalwart

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1055
Re: New divebomber
« Reply #35 on: July 25, 2010, 02:51:51 AM »
Frankly, I'd rather see this aircraft added, and a whole many others that have been suggested, than to endure another sound and/or graphics update.

Offline Fencer51

  • Aces High CM Staff (Retired)
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4679
Re: New divebomber
« Reply #36 on: July 26, 2010, 10:56:12 AM »
+2 to what Corky, errr Guppy said.Rabaul would be a nice scenario. In fact, I just started reading a book called " Fortress Rabaul'..

Let me know if that Book is worth it please, from the Table of Contents it seems to focus too much on Yamamato and his death.

Now why I would need reference material for Rabaul...  :noid
Fencer
The names of the irrelevant have been changed to protect their irrelevance.
The names of the innocent and the guilty have not been changed.
As for the innocent, everyone needs to know they are innocent –
As for the guilty… they can suck it.

Offline Soulyss

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6558
      • Aces High Events
Re: New divebomber
« Reply #37 on: July 26, 2010, 11:09:01 AM »
Let me know if that Book is worth it please, from the Table of Contents it seems to focus too much on Yamamato and his death.

Now why I would need reference material for Rabaul...  :noid

 :x

Fencer, my heart just skipped a beat when I read that last bit, don't toy with me like that. :)

I'd actually love a good Rabaul book myself, I've been considering getting "The Siege of Rabaul" by Henry Sakaida, but it seems to focus on the time after Rabaul had ceased to be a important strategic target for the Allies, rather than look at the major battles that occurred prior.

http://www.pacificwrecks.com/reviews/siege.html
80th FS "Headhunters"
I blame mir.

Offline cactuskooler

  • Skinner Team
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2093
Re: New divebomber
« Reply #38 on: July 27, 2010, 01:43:52 AM »
Let me know if that Book is worth it please, from the Table of Contents it seems to focus too much on Yamamato and his death.

Now why I would need reference material for Rabaul...  :noid

I recall reading that the book ends after the Yamamoto mission in April, but that a second book is being worked on. I haven't read it yet though. It's still on my shelf in the "to read" section.
cactus
80th FS "Headhunters"

Noseart

Offline AceHavok

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 510
Re: New divebomber
« Reply #39 on: August 06, 2010, 10:25:44 PM »
+1  :aok
Currently inactive.


Peace cannot be kept by force; it can only be achieved by understanding. - Albert Einstein

Offline Avanti

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 282
Re: New divebomber
« Reply #40 on: August 06, 2010, 11:34:10 PM »
Quick quick! suggest a similar plane from a different country!!

Fairley Firefly

EDIT: +1

Avanti

Offline Tupac

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5056
Re: New divebomber
« Reply #41 on: August 07, 2010, 05:26:52 PM »
I've always been an advocate for this plane

+1
"It was once believed that an infinite number of monkeys, typing on an infinite number of keyboards, would eventually reproduce the works of Shakespeare. However, with the advent of Internet messageboards we now know this is not the case."

Offline Nemisis

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4086
      • Fightin 49'ers
Re: New divebomber
« Reply #42 on: August 07, 2010, 08:10:53 PM »
Would love to see this added. Might be the first naval strike plane to see some widespread use against CV's. That and it would be one of 1 cannon armed CV planes that can carry any substancial ord load.
All man needs to be happy is a home, his wife, and a place in the world

Col. 49Nem, Armor commander of the 49th

Offline THRASH99

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 271
Re: New divebomber
« Reply #43 on: August 08, 2010, 02:16:25 AM »
I don't want to take anything from the US planeset, but.....

Imagine a B-17E instead of a B-17G.
How about a B-24D rather than a B-24J.
An SBD-3 in place of the SBD-5.
TBD-1 to fill the role of the TBM-3.


I wouldn't agree with all of those changes, but some of them are comparable to the situation that, say, some Japanese aircraft are in.
Or we can just add them instead of substituting them, B-17E can be in early war instead of just Ju-88s and lancs(which are a load of perks at a rip off price.) I mean some of these early models would be nice to have in the game to try out.

Jokers Jokers
"CAN'T TALK NOW.....GOTTA SHOOT!" - Dan Zoernig
"Masters of the Air" Scenario - 56th FG

Offline bomber

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7
Re: New divebomber
« Reply #44 on: August 08, 2010, 12:38:13 PM »
ive always wanted the helldiver  :aok :aok :aok :aok