Author Topic: Anti-ack  (Read 620 times)

Offline FlakBait422

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 49
Anti-ack
« on: July 22, 2010, 03:56:50 PM »
I'm sure each and everyone of you know what I'm talking about when I say ACK HUGGERS MAKE ME PUKE! When you're in a good ole' fashion fight, dueling and having a fun time, and the evil 37mm's of the field come out to play. Now I'm not talking a vulch- or an aerial vulch, I'm talking an ack-hugger who runs from a fight to his field defense. Although that could have been used back in WWII, and it is an acceptable habit to become acustom to (I say that to keep everyone happy...), Even in the war it had its draw backs. A huge sum of aircraft lost (Attack on Y-29 for example) their lives due to friendly field fire. Flak divisions of German gunners took out more than a quarter of friendly german aircraft in operation Bodenplatte, a last ditch effort by the Germans on Allied airfields. What I'm getting at, is that Ack-ack can be a problem in the real world to even friendly fighters. Thus- I'd like to suggest a friendly fire system, when If you run to your own ack in a fight, just like the real world, you too can be damaged by it. Although I know ack can injure you in the game already- in the real world though, it would be far more unpredictable as to where it hits. I'm not looking for a flame war here, Just reasonable critiques.Thoughts?  :angel:
 :cheers: FlakBait

I was told by a wise man to change my forum signature... and so I have. I am a better man now ;)

Offline BulletVI

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 891
      • http://virtuallyinfamous.webs.com
Re: Anti-ack
« Reply #1 on: July 22, 2010, 04:06:16 PM »

If im defending a base and there is noway i can shake you off my tail i will head for the base to hopefully make you break off and then i can come round and try to kill you i dont want the flack to do it. I want the kill and hence i stay up in the air longer to defend my base :)  :salute
You Don't See Me But You Hear Me Coming Then Darkness

HUH Computer's GIVE ME A SPANNER AND A WRENCH ANY DAY OF THE WEEK.  ( Mr Fix It ) :)

Offline olds442

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2239
Re: Anti-ack
« Reply #2 on: July 22, 2010, 04:12:22 PM »
I'm sure each and everyone of you know what I'm talking about when I say ACK HUGGERS MAKE ME PUKE! When you're in a good ole' fashion fight, dueling and having a fun time, and the evil 37mm's of the field come out to play. Now I'm not talking a vulch- or an aerial vulch, I'm talking an ack-hugger who runs from a fight to his field defense. Although that could have been used back in WWII, and it is an acceptable habit to become acustom to (I say that to keep everyone happy...), Even in the war it had its draw backs. A huge sum of aircraft lost (Attack on Y-29 for example) their lives due to friendly field fire. Flak divisions of German gunners took out more than a quarter of friendly german aircraft in operation Bodenplatte, a last ditch effort by the Germans on Allied airfields. What I'm getting at, is that Ack-ack can be a problem in the real world to even friendly fighters. Thus- I'd like to suggest a friendly fire system, when If you run to your own ack in a fight, just like the real world, you too can be damaged by it. Although I know ack can injure you in the game already- in the real world though, it would be far more unpredictable as to where it hits. I'm not looking for a flame war here, Just reasonable critiques.Thoughts?  :angel:
 :cheers: FlakBait
 

and what happens when u take off?
only a moron would use Dolby positioning in a game.
IGN: cutlass "shovels and rakes and implements of destruction"

Offline FlakBait422

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 49
Re: Anti-ack
« Reply #3 on: July 22, 2010, 04:22:25 PM »
Quote
and what happens when u take off?

You fly? Nothing will happen when you take off? If acks firing, it'll simply add.. some adventure?
I was told by a wise man to change my forum signature... and so I have. I am a better man now ;)

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: Anti-ack
« Reply #4 on: July 22, 2010, 04:24:52 PM »
What I'm getting at, is that Ack-ack can be a problem.


Yes I can be, especially to those that find me on their six.


ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline FlakBait422

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 49
Re: Anti-ack
« Reply #5 on: July 22, 2010, 04:26:21 PM »
bahahaa ^^ :D
I was told by a wise man to change my forum signature... and so I have. I am a better man now ;)

Offline Bayland 2

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 17
Re: Anti-ack
« Reply #6 on: July 22, 2010, 04:26:55 PM »
 :airplane:- - - - - - -  :airplane:

and +1 to the idea

Bayland- 82nd Fighter Group
~97th Fighter Squadron~

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: Anti-ack
« Reply #7 on: July 22, 2010, 04:27:26 PM »
Don't follow them into the acks is the easiest solution to your problem.  If  you see them running to their base, break off and loiter outside of ack range.

ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline Puck

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2980
Re: Anti-ack
« Reply #8 on: July 22, 2010, 04:29:13 PM »
Yes I can be, especially to those that find me on their six.


ack-ack

This doesn't happen very often.  He generally kills you from your three, or four...you get the idea.  Ack-Ack rarely hangs around long enough to get on your six.
//c coad  c coad run  run coad run
main (){char _[]={"S~||(iuv{nkx%K9Y$hzhhd\x0c"},__
,___=1;for(__=___>>___;__<((___<<___<<___<<___<<___
)+(___<<___<<___<<___)-___);__+=___)putchar((_[__
])+(__/((___<<___)+___))-((___&

Offline FlakBait422

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 49
Re: Anti-ack
« Reply #9 on: July 22, 2010, 04:29:42 PM »
Very true, I just find that to be outstandingly frustrating :D But yes Ackack, that is a viable solution.
I was told by a wise man to change my forum signature... and so I have. I am a better man now ;)

Offline SlapShot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9121
Re: Anti-ack
« Reply #10 on: July 22, 2010, 04:36:05 PM »
I'm sure each and everyone of you know what I'm talking about when I say ACK HUGGERS MAKE ME PUKE! When you're in a good ole' fashion fight, dueling and having a fun time, and the evil 37mm's of the field come out to play. Now I'm not talking a vulch- or an aerial vulch, I'm talking an ack-hugger who runs from a fight to his field defense. Although that could have been used back in WWII, and it is an acceptable habit to become acustom to (I say that to keep everyone happy...), Even in the war it had its draw backs. A huge sum of aircraft lost (Attack on Y-29 for example) their lives due to friendly field fire. Flak divisions of German gunners took out more than a quarter of friendly german aircraft in operation Bodenplatte, a last ditch effort by the Germans on Allied airfields. What I'm getting at, is that Ack-ack can be a problem in the real world to even friendly fighters. Thus- I'd like to suggest a friendly fire system, when If you run to your own ack in a fight, just like the real world, you too can be damaged by it. Although I know ack can injure you in the game already- in the real world though, it would be far more unpredictable as to where it hits. I'm not looking for a flame war here, Just reasonable critiques.Thoughts?  :angel:
 :cheers: FlakBait



And the first time you are defending your field against a concentrated attack with enemy planes diving in and out of the ack and then your own ack starts taking out you and your buddies you'll wish that you didn't make this wish.
SlapShot - Blue Knights

Guppy: "The only risk we take is the fight, and since no one really dies, the reward is the fight."

Offline AWwrgwy

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5478
Re: Anti-ack
« Reply #11 on: July 22, 2010, 04:59:07 PM »
Most if not all of the friendly fire incidents at Y-29 were either due to, "here comes a low plane, shoot it" or a friendly chasing and enemy plane and the ground gunners failing to lead by enough margin to hit the following aircraft.

Over Berlin, intercepting fighters did not follow the attacking bombers into the AAA boxes unless they too wanted to risk getting hit.

I would almost give a +1 to manned puffy ack bit that would be griefer heaven.


wrongway
71 (Eagle) Squadron
"THAT"S PAINT!!"

"If nothing else works, a total pig-headed unwillingness to look facts in the face will see us through."
- General Sir Anthony Cecil Hogmanay

Offline FlakBait422

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 49
Re: Anti-ack
« Reply #12 on: July 23, 2010, 01:53:51 PM »
Yes, puffy ack that can kill a friendly would be useful- but then there'd be that "one guy" Sitting on the stern of the friendly carrier in the 5inch vulching friendlies as they take off
I was told by a wise man to change my forum signature... and so I have. I am a better man now ;)

Offline whiteman

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4228
Re: Anti-ack
« Reply #13 on: July 23, 2010, 02:04:26 PM »
Friendly Auto Puffy was taken me out over CV's, attacking buffs that are in Auto Puffy range isn't always a good idea.