Something in so bad a state of repair, so poorly treated, so poorly cannibalized for parts, at the end of the war? I think the burden of proof is on whether it was ever actually used for combat or not. It may have been the equivalent of a squadron hack or a training plane, or something along those lines. Or, even if it was an active combat airframe, it may have looked radically different when it was in service as compared to when it was on the ground for bored ground-crews to relieve stress by adding some camo to it so that they could strip its parts with more safety.
IMO photos like this need a LOT more context before you could assume that they were actually used in the state they appear in the photo.