To give you an idea of what I am working on I offer the following image...
Fortunately I was given the oba for northsea...upon leveraging that, the planning program is capable of generating interactive planning maps that let the user decide what and what not to show...this image for example shows shore battery traverse and coverage overlaps..in this case shore battery coverage for 91 and 92 was made visible...it also demonstrates the 'melding' of warning ranges, radar ranges....ship start grids and active bases...
This image was called up for an analysis requested by command on the range and overlaps of the battery's at those two fields...
Without oba files I need to definitively define the grid system at its finest granularity....users will be forced to consume PLN and FLD files...thats better than nothing...then the user can drag fields into the grid and they will at least lock up in the appropriate grid square - sub grid mini square...
Of course without oba rotational data on shore battery we cannot plot traverse angles and over laps...but at this point I just need to make sure my grid indexing algorithm is consistent with terrain editor output...
I want to make sure my object snap is correct....
Thus my question...
The end result of this work will be a free product for the community available to any event commander who wishes to leverage the tool...the whole idea of this is to give all planners a tool that eases their work load..thus drawing in more people willing to assume command...and subsequently enourages 'day' players because their commanders are armed and proficient with the information necessary for team success...
Its about operational effectiveness and execution...its about elevating the experience...