Author Topic: New planes, anyone?  (Read 2131 times)

Offline 321BAR

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6140
Re: New planes, anyone?
« Reply #30 on: October 14, 2010, 10:20:06 PM »
I am in need of a new epic quote
Happy Jack's Go Buggy

Offline 321BAR

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6140
I am in need of a new epic quote
Happy Jack's Go Buggy

Offline Saxman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9155
Re: New planes, anyone?
« Reply #32 on: October 14, 2010, 10:59:40 PM »
Gloster Meteor - No. While it did see combat in WW2 and was in squadron strength, there are still other planes needed in the AH planeset first.

That, and we have two jets and one rocket TOO MANY in the game as it is.

 :noid :noid :noid
Ron White says you can't fix stupid. I beg to differ. Stupid will usually sort itself out, it's just a matter of making sure you're not close enough to become collateral damage.

Offline stealth

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1336
Re: New planes, anyone?
« Reply #33 on: October 14, 2010, 11:06:36 PM »
Planes.
1st one-yes
2nd one-no
3rd one-no
4th one-yes
5th one-no

Why we leaving out the french planes so much,what don't like there pastries?
My Email is ACalex88@gmail.com if you want to contact me

"I shall fear no evil, for I am 80,000 feet and climbing"

Offline Avanti

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 282
Re: New planes, anyone?
« Reply #34 on: October 14, 2010, 11:23:55 PM »
CAC Boomerang!

Offline Rich46yo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7358
Re: New planes, anyone?
« Reply #35 on: October 15, 2010, 04:28:44 AM »
The TU-2. A really remarkable attacker.
"flying the aircraft of the Red Star"

Offline ares473

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 91
Re: New planes, anyone?
« Reply #36 on: October 15, 2010, 11:19:25 AM »
There has been mention of "more important planes" that should be added first. I am curious as to which aircraft those are
I know I can fly and I know I can shoot, just not at the same time.

Offline skorpion

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3798
Re: New planes, anyone?
« Reply #37 on: October 15, 2010, 07:55:45 PM »
i think we need a few french planes in the game they would be great addition  :devil

Offline fbWldcat

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2970
Re: New planes, anyone?
« Reply #38 on: October 16, 2010, 12:08:32 AM »
There has been mention of "more important planes" that should be added first. I am curious as to which aircraft those are

He-111
Bristol Blenheim
Ki-100
A few folks want the A6M3
Lagg-1/3
IL-4

The list goes on.
Mostly the much neglected Japanese and Russian plane-sets. But alos a couple of early war RAF bombers and very important German bombers (All categories covered in the list above.)
Landing is overrated.
"Two roads diverged in a wood, and I: I took the one less traveled by." - Robert Frost
"Uncommon valor was a common virtue." <S>

Offline Saxman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9155
Re: New planes, anyone?
« Reply #39 on: October 16, 2010, 09:06:19 AM »
The G4M needs to be on that list. Most important Japanese bomber of the war, and we ain't got it.
Ron White says you can't fix stupid. I beg to differ. Stupid will usually sort itself out, it's just a matter of making sure you're not close enough to become collateral damage.

Offline Tupac

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5056
Re: New planes, anyone?
« Reply #40 on: October 16, 2010, 09:28:22 AM »
The Blackwidow also saw action in the ETO and CBI and it did not go 500mph at 5,000ft. 

ack-ack

Nate doesn't know what he is talking about, disregard anything he says
"It was once believed that an infinite number of monkeys, typing on an infinite number of keyboards, would eventually reproduce the works of Shakespeare. However, with the advent of Internet messageboards we now know this is not the case."

Offline fbWldcat

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2970
Re: New planes, anyone?
« Reply #41 on: October 16, 2010, 03:23:30 PM »
The G4M needs to be on that list. Most important Japanese bomber of the war, and we ain't got it.

It was just a small list of things that popped to mind, the G4M just didn't pop in. But yes, the G4M definitely needs to be added to the game.
Landing is overrated.
"Two roads diverged in a wood, and I: I took the one less traveled by." - Robert Frost
"Uncommon valor was a common virtue." <S>

Offline Dichotomy

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12386
Re: New planes, anyone?
« Reply #42 on: October 17, 2010, 11:19:02 AM »
how about this one?

copying Saxmans post


Lockheed PV-2 Harpoon
4000lbs of bombs or torpedoes
8x.50cal machine guns forward fixed
8x5" HVAR
Maximum speed 320mph
Range of ~2500mi

Not as fast as the Mosquito, but double the range while also being faster than the B-25 and B-26 and comparable in bomb load, while also carrying rockets.
JG11 - Dicho37Only The Proud Only The Strong AH Players who've passed on :salute

Offline JOACH1M

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9803
Re: New planes, anyone?
« Reply #43 on: October 17, 2010, 11:27:16 AM »
Just give us HE111 and p61 blackwidow
FEW ~ BK's ~ AoM
Focke Wulf Me / Last Of The GOATS 🐐
ToC 2013 & 2017 Champ
R.I.P My Brothers <3

Offline Greebo

  • Skinner Team
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7008
Re: New planes, anyone?
« Reply #44 on: October 17, 2010, 03:33:34 PM »
The main problem with French planes is that they only saw action during the Battle of France up to June 1940 and then briefly during Operation Torch. This means they have a limited number of scenarios they can be used in (two effectively). They wouldn't be very competitive in the MAs either, even in the EW MA with its much better 1941 era fighters and bombers.

The game needs at least one slow early war bomber for scenarios. Something from 1940/41; slow, poorly armoured and with rifle calibre guns for defence. Currently it is hard to run effective early war scenarios since the 1941 bombers we have outclass the 1940 fighters. You could have an He 111, G4M, Il-4, Wellington or SM-79. As an added bonus all of these were used as both torpedo bombers and level bombers. Any of these could sub for any of the others in a whole load of 1940-41 scenarios a lot more realistically than the Boston, B-25 or Ju 88 can.

The main lacks WRT fighters for scenarios are the Ki 43 and the Yaks 1, 3 and 7. The Ki 43 would be a fun ride even in the late war MA, slow and pathetically armed but it would out turn anything. The Yak-3 would be a fantastic LW MA ride. The Beaufighter has also a lot of scenario potential and would have a nice niche in the MA; a torpedo bomber with four Hispanos.

Planes like the B-29, A-26, Meteor, Me 410 and G 55 would do well in the LW MA but are more restricted scenario wise.
« Last Edit: October 17, 2010, 03:38:56 PM by Greebo »