Author Topic: Bf109F4  (Read 3300 times)

Offline StokesAk

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3665
Re: Bf109F4
« Reply #45 on: October 23, 2010, 04:19:39 PM »



im talking it should be balanced according to what was historically accurate....if a 109f4 is flying with g6 and g14 then it probably would have been the one with the uprated engine....

obviously for the ew mw it can stay as it is, but it dosent make any sense for a 109f4 to be flying around with p51 and la7 with an underrated engine.

HTC doesn't make planes for the arenas. They made the arenas for the planes. LWA is simply all the planes in the game smashed up with each other.

You obviously don't understand the width of this game.
Strokes

Offline Imowface

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1124
Re: Bf109F4
« Reply #46 on: October 23, 2010, 11:42:34 PM »
if he gets his "uprated" F-4, I want to have the proper trim tabs on the K-4 as most of them IRL had
Ла-5 Пилот снова
NASA spent 12 million dollars to develop a pen that could work in space, Russia went to space with pencils...

Offline FLS

  • AH Training Corps
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11621
      • Trainer's Website
Re: Bf109F4
« Reply #47 on: October 24, 2010, 03:59:36 PM »
26 mph faster at alt (394 to 420) is not a slight thrust increase...

That would make it faster than a Spit16 and it would still turn tighter with full flaps. You'd have an aircraft that out-performed a Spit16 regardless of pilot skill. I see your point about historical accuracy.

Offline Perrine

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 654
Re: Bf109F4
« Reply #48 on: October 24, 2010, 04:56:47 PM »
how about make 109F4 and G2 WEP-less?

109G2 is a 1942 plane and WEP was prohibited by the manufacturer at that time.

109F4 is a 1941 plane and had same restrictions as 109g2

save wep for 109g6 only

( btw the in-game 109F at military power is even match for spit 5b with just 5 minute wep.)
« Last Edit: October 24, 2010, 05:14:23 PM by Perrine »

Offline Imowface

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1124
Re: Bf109F4
« Reply #49 on: October 24, 2010, 05:02:49 PM »
where did you read the Messerschmitt prohibited WEP on planes ever?
Ла-5 Пилот снова
NASA spent 12 million dollars to develop a pen that could work in space, Russia went to space with pencils...

Offline Perrine

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 654
Re: Bf109F4
« Reply #50 on: October 24, 2010, 05:04:41 PM »
where did you read the Messerschmitt prohibited WEP on planes ever?

OP's

Offline Imowface

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1124
Re: Bf109F4
« Reply #51 on: October 24, 2010, 05:22:29 PM »
ah the wiki source, honestly,

there is more room for a 109G-10 then there is for a different 109F-4, or give us a 109G-6/AS with erla-haube, make the one we have now an earlier version without the Galland-Panzer and it will "fill" better then another F-4
Ла-5 Пилот снова
NASA spent 12 million dollars to develop a pen that could work in space, Russia went to space with pencils...

Offline Perrine

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 654
Re: Bf109F4
« Reply #52 on: October 24, 2010, 05:24:43 PM »