Author Topic: Don't disappoint us, HiTech...  (Read 2338 times)

Offline JHerne

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 659
Re: Don't disappoint us, HiTech...
« Reply #15 on: October 28, 2010, 12:42:58 PM »
Sorry, He-111 didn't carry the Fritz X into combat. It was tested with the 111, but in combat, the 217 K-2, K-3, and M-11s.

The 177 was also planned, but again, didn't see combat with it.

J
Skunkworks AvA Researcher and
Primary Cause of Angst

Offline FLOTSOM

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2822
      • http://www.myspace.com/prfctstrngr
Re: Don't disappoint us, HiTech...
« Reply #16 on: October 28, 2010, 12:52:04 PM »
321 just as an FYI the M18 came up in discussion at con. Pyro's short answer, its just too good, would make all other GV's irrelevant and have a huge negative impact on gameplay even if perked.

i have no understanding on this line of logic.

yes the M18 was fast (fastest of the tank destroyers) but that was only useful on open ROADS, it was still a multi-ton (17ish) piece of metal when it was off road thus the actual speed was dictated by terrain.

it has a skin about as durable as an orange peal. 0.2 to 1.0 inches. (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M18_Hellcat for M18 stats, yes its wikkie but i cant find anything to contradict it) this translates to meaning that a solid .50 cal burst would not only penetrate most of its hull (see http://www.inetres.com/gp/military/infantry/mg/50_ammo.html for .50 cal stats) but would easily kill the crew inside, additionally any 20mm or bigger round striking it would decimate the M18. this ease of destruction is also true for any bomb landing near it or any HE shell landing close. you would have to park 3 of these abreast to stop an AP round fired from a tiger at close range!

its an egg shell with a cannon. in the real world it served its purpose efficiently because the allies held air superiority, without it this vehicle would have been destroyed en-mass on the field. as it would be in our arena's, providing the armor is modeled correctly, and it's use of super high speed on open terrain comes with consequences (hell if a sheep could flip a 50 ton tiger at 20 mph what would it do to an M18 at 50?  :devil ). almost every plane in the game could destroy or disable it without ords of any kind.

so go ahead put it in, model it correctly and I'm gonna laugh watching the screaming on 200 and counting all the "MY UBBER M18 GOT KILLED BY A........." threads that will in no time flood this board.
FLOTSOM

Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups!
Quote from Skuzzy
"The game is designed to encourage combat, not hide from it."
http://www.myspace.com/prfctstrngr

Offline 321BAR

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6140
Re: Don't disappoint us, HiTech...
« Reply #17 on: October 28, 2010, 12:56:07 PM »
i have no understanding on this line of logic.

yes the M18 was fast (fastest of the tank destroyers) but that was only useful on open ROADS, it was still a multi-ton (17ish) piece of metal when it was off road thus the actual speed was dictated by terrain.

it has a skin about as durable as an orange peal. 0.2 to 1.0 inches. (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M18_Hellcat for M18 stats, yes its wikkie but i cant find anything to contradict it) this translates to meaning that a solid .50 cal burst would not only penetrate most of its hull (see http://www.inetres.com/gp/military/infantry/mg/50_ammo.html for .50 cal stats) but would easily kill the crew inside, additionally any 20mm or bigger round striking it would decimate the M18. this ease of destruction is also true for any bomb landing near it or any HE shell landing close. you would have to park 3 of these abreast to stop an AP round fired from a tiger at close range!

its an egg shell with a cannon. in the real world it served its purpose efficiently because the allies held air superiority, without it this vehicle would have been destroyed en-mass on the field. as it would be in our arena's, providing the armor is modeled correctly, and it's use of super high speed on open terrain comes with consequences (hell if a sheep could flip a 50 ton tiger at 20 mph what would it do to an M18 at 50?  :devil ). almost every plane in the game could destroy or disable it without ords of any kind.

so go ahead put it in, model it correctly and I'm gonna laugh watching the screaming on 200 and counting all the "MY UBBER M18 GOT KILLED BY A........." threads that will in no time flood this board.
this is exactly what i thought! why would it destabilize the game when anything (even M8s) can kill it?
I am in need of a new epic quote
Happy Jack's Go Buggy

Offline FLOTSOM

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2822
      • http://www.myspace.com/prfctstrngr
Re: Don't disappoint us, HiTech...
« Reply #18 on: October 28, 2010, 01:15:55 PM »
this is exactly what i thought! why would it destabilize the game when anything (even M8s) can kill it?

an M8? hell even a jeep could run up on it and stand a good chance of destroying or disabling it!!! http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/wiki/index.php/Jeep
FLOTSOM

Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups!
Quote from Skuzzy
"The game is designed to encourage combat, not hide from it."
http://www.myspace.com/prfctstrngr

Offline Imowface

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1124
Re: Don't disappoint us, HiTech...
« Reply #19 on: October 28, 2010, 01:32:05 PM »
Sorry, He-111 didn't carry the Fritz X into combat. It was tested with the 111, but in combat, the 217 K-2, K-3, and M-11s.

The 177 was also planned, but again, didn't see combat with it.

J

He-177 did see combat, it was used against shipping and bridges and german pilots discovered that if they maintained a 1k fpm decent the could average 400mph on the flight home
Ла-5 Пилот снова
NASA spent 12 million dollars to develop a pen that could work in space, Russia went to space with pencils...

Offline AWwrgwy

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5478
Re: Don't disappoint us, HiTech...
« Reply #20 on: October 28, 2010, 01:48:21 PM »
i have no understanding on this line of logic.

yes the M18 was fast (fastest of the tank destroyers) but that was only useful on open ROADS, it was still a multi-ton (17ish) piece of metal when it was off road thus the actual speed was dictated by terrain.

it has a skin about as durable as an orange peal. 0.2 to 1.0 inches. (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M18_Hellcat for M18 stats, yes its wikkie but i cant find anything to contradict it) this translates to meaning that a solid .50 cal burst would not only penetrate most of its hull (see http://www.inetres.com/gp/military/infantry/mg/50_ammo.html for .50 cal stats) but would easily kill the crew inside, additionally any 20mm or bigger round striking it would decimate the M18. this ease of destruction is also true for any bomb landing near it or any HE shell landing close. you would have to park 3 of these abreast to stop an AP round fired from a tiger at close range!

its an egg shell with a cannon. in the real world it served its purpose efficiently because the allies held air superiority, without it this vehicle would have been destroyed en-mass on the field. as it would be in our arena's, providing the armor is modeled correctly, and it's use of super high speed on open terrain comes with consequences (hell if a sheep could flip a 50 ton tiger at 20 mph what would it do to an M18 at 50?  :devil ). almost every plane in the game could destroy or disable it without ords of any kind.

so go ahead put it in, model it correctly and I'm gonna laugh watching the screaming on 200 and counting all the "MY UBBER M18 GOT KILLED BY A........." threads that will in no time flood this board.


+1 also.

It has the same gun as the M4-76 in game now as well.  It would just be a big, perked M-8.


wrongway
71 (Eagle) Squadron
"THAT"S PAINT!!"

"If nothing else works, a total pig-headed unwillingness to look facts in the face will see us through."
- General Sir Anthony Cecil Hogmanay

Offline Martyn

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 536
Re: Don't disappoint us, HiTech...
« Reply #21 on: October 28, 2010, 01:50:26 PM »
GVs always seem to travel at max speed on the flat - but it should really depend on the terrain. Wheeled vehicles suffer far more than tracked vehicle over soft/bumpy ground. That's why roads were kinda strategic.

BTW - I love the new towns  :aok

..and the Mossie XVI  :aok
Here we are, living on top of a molten ball of rock, spinning around at a 1,000mph, orbiting a nuclear fireball and whizzing through space at half-a-million miles per hour. Most of us believe in super-beings which for some reason need to be praised for setting this up. This, apparently, is normal.

Offline Fatboy26

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 83
Re: Don't disappoint us, HiTech...
« Reply #22 on: October 28, 2010, 06:50:00 PM »
With all of the new bombers being added....

Me410  :noid
Proudly campaigning (screaming, whining, begging, pleading) for the addition of the Me410 to AH2

Fatboy

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Re: Don't disappoint us, HiTech...
« Reply #23 on: October 28, 2010, 08:16:09 PM »
He-177 did see combat, it was used against shipping and bridges and german pilots discovered that if they maintained a 1k fpm decent the could average 400mph on the flight home
You misunderstood him.  The He177 saw combat.  It did not see combat with the Fritz X or Henschel Hs293.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Imowface

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1124
Re: Don't disappoint us, HiTech...
« Reply #24 on: October 28, 2010, 10:39:40 PM »
I was under the impression that it used the Hs 293 in the bridge raids, I may be wrong though
Ла-5 Пилот снова
NASA spent 12 million dollars to develop a pen that could work in space, Russia went to space with pencils...

Offline cooldued

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 495
Re: Don't disappoint us, HiTech...
« Reply #25 on: October 29, 2010, 12:59:23 AM »
Bring in the He-111 with the next update  :aok

ops your a little late, there already working on something and i cant what to see it.
but i do wish the he-111 was as high on hitechs to add list as it is on my withlist.
Planes I'm good in the Bf-109 G14, the B-25C, and the B-17G not many but its nice for me to know :P

Offline Avanti

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 282
Re: Don't disappoint us, HiTech...
« Reply #26 on: October 29, 2010, 01:14:07 AM »
The to planse I want to see on this game before the years end is the He-111 and the CAC Boomerang

Avanti

Offline Imowface

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1124
Re: Don't disappoint us, HiTech...
« Reply #27 on: October 29, 2010, 01:40:34 AM »
Pe-2, Tu-2, or Il-4 are more needed then the boomerang
Ла-5 Пилот снова
NASA spent 12 million dollars to develop a pen that could work in space, Russia went to space with pencils...

Offline cooldued

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 495
Re: Don't disappoint us, HiTech...
« Reply #28 on: November 02, 2010, 03:32:47 AM »
Pe-2, Tu-2, or Il-4 are more needed then the boomerang

the XF5U flying pancake?

lol jk i dont tink this plane applys to Any of the standards of adding a plane to aceshigh.
Planes I'm good in the Bf-109 G14, the B-25C, and the B-17G not many but its nice for me to know :P

Offline EskimoJoe

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4831
Re: Don't disappoint us, HiTech...
« Reply #29 on: November 02, 2010, 05:36:57 AM »
The to planse I want to see on this game before the years end is the He-111 and the CAC Boomerang

Avanti

Though I want the A-26 rather badly, I voted for the He-111 anyway  :aok
Put a +1 on your geekness atribute  :aok