Author Topic: opinions on this aircraft.  (Read 1782 times)

Offline fullmetalbullet

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 834
opinions on this aircraft.
« on: November 20, 2010, 05:41:56 PM »
The Pe-8. i did use the search button and found 2 topics, and also did some reasearch on the aircraft. so besides filling a gap in russian planes. would it even be used in the MAs? heck even the better BUFFs get shot down way to easily. so would it even be used?
"Cry Havoc, And Let Slip The Dogs Of War" Julius Caesar


Offline Motherland

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8110
Re: opinions on this aircraft.
« Reply #1 on: November 20, 2010, 08:45:34 PM »
so besides filling a gap in russian planes.
It wouldn't fill any gaps, it was largely worthless and rarely used. It didn't really fit into VVS doctrine.
The DB-3/Il-4, Pe-2, and Tu-2 were the workhorses of the VVS.
« Last Edit: November 20, 2010, 08:47:50 PM by Motherland »

Offline fullmetalbullet

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 834
Re: opinions on this aircraft.
« Reply #2 on: November 20, 2010, 08:50:52 PM »
how would it not fill any gaps? we need more russian aircraft.
"Cry Havoc, And Let Slip The Dogs Of War" Julius Caesar


Offline BrownBaron

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1832
Re: opinions on this aircraft.
« Reply #3 on: November 20, 2010, 08:55:52 PM »
how would it not fill any gaps? we need more russian aircraft.

It wasn't a Russian workhorse like the above aircraft were.

Pe-2

8 is bigger than 2, so they must have used to way moar!
O Jagdgeschwader 77

Ingame ID: Johannes

Offline Motherland

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8110
Re: opinions on this aircraft.
« Reply #4 on: November 20, 2010, 08:55:59 PM »
how would it not fill any gaps? we need more russian aircraft.
Because the Soviets barely ever used it. Only 90 some were built. The only raids it was used on were morale raids where it rarely met enemy fighters. On the occasions it did it was massacred. You can't really build any scenarios around it, it wasn't used in any battles like the other bombers I listed were.
If we get Soviet aircraft, we should get the ones that were used. Not the ones that weren't.

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Re: opinions on this aircraft.
« Reply #5 on: November 20, 2010, 09:30:42 PM »
I am hoping that the fact the Tu-2 was not on the poll is because it is already in the production queue.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline fullmetalbullet

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 834
Re: opinions on this aircraft.
« Reply #6 on: November 20, 2010, 09:35:11 PM »
im not saying add the Pe-8 into the game i was trying to get opinions on weather it would be used if they did add it?
"Cry Havoc, And Let Slip The Dogs Of War" Julius Caesar


Offline Motherland

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8110
Re: opinions on this aircraft.
« Reply #7 on: November 20, 2010, 09:39:48 PM »
im not saying add the Pe-8 into the game i was trying to get opinions on weather it would be used if they did add it?
It wouldn't have a use in FSO's and I have to doubt it would be extremely popular in the MA's.

I am hoping that the fact the Tu-2 was not on the poll is because it is already in the production queue.
Hadn't thought of that... :aok

Offline fullmetalbullet

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 834
Re: opinions on this aircraft.
« Reply #8 on: November 20, 2010, 09:55:20 PM »
tbh if i had a wish that would be to make the US buffs more like the real ones used in WW2. very very hard to bring down. i have seen photos of B-17s landing with half a rudder a few feet of wing gone. they could take huge amounts of punishment and still bring its crew back home.

and i see the Pe-8 wouldnt be popular huh? nah the TU-2 i wouldnt fly at all.
"Cry Havoc, And Let Slip The Dogs Of War" Julius Caesar


Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Re: opinions on this aircraft.
« Reply #9 on: November 20, 2010, 10:06:12 PM »
tbh if i had a wish that would be to make the US buffs more like the real ones used in WW2. very very hard to bring down. i have seen photos of B-17s landing with half a rudder a few feet of wing gone. they could take huge amounts of punishment and still bring its crew back home.

and i see the Pe-8 wouldnt be popular huh? nah the TU-2 i wouldnt fly at all.
1) The US bombers are already very tough.  The Lancaster, also a tough bomber, takes 13 Hispano direct hits to the tail to remove the tail.  The B-17 took, as I recall, 18 hits.  Don't be to reliant on the photos of the beat up aircraft that made it home.  There are no photos of the aircraft that didn't make it and quite often the damage that was fatal did not look nearly as impressive as the photos you are referring to.  Also, remember that a lot of times those photos were taken because they did stand out and were unusual.

2) The Tu-2 would be a pretty useful bomber in AH.  It is fast, carries a heavy load and has not entirely useless defensive guns.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Void

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 293
Re: opinions on this aircraft.
« Reply #10 on: November 20, 2010, 11:05:02 PM »
Pe-2 and Tu-2 are my dream birds..
In Game name: Namco

Offline Scotty55OEFVet

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 628
Re: opinions on this aircraft.
« Reply #11 on: November 20, 2010, 11:37:01 PM »
I am hoping that the fact the Tu-2 was not on the poll is because it is already in the production queue.

Heard that Panther WAS actually going to added but gonna be a while...any truth to that?
"War can only be abolished through war...in order to get rid of the gun it is necessary to take up the gun."



RedDevil

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Re: opinions on this aircraft.
« Reply #12 on: November 20, 2010, 11:47:28 PM »
Heard that Panther WAS actually going to added but gonna be a while...any truth to that?

Somebody who was at the Con would be a better source on that.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline MiloMorai

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6864
Re: opinions on this aircraft.
« Reply #13 on: November 21, 2010, 02:57:29 AM »
tbh if i had a wish that would be to make the US buffs more like the real ones used in WW2. very very hard to bring down. i have seen photos of B-17s landing with half a rudder a few feet of wing gone. they could take huge amounts of punishment and still bring its crew back home.

Number of bombers lost by each heavy bomber group in the 8th Air Force during World War II

http://www.taphilo.com/history/8thaf/8aflosses.shtml

Offline Grendel

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 877
      • http://www.compart.fi/icebreakers
Re: opinions on this aircraft.
« Reply #14 on: November 21, 2010, 03:16:58 AM »
how would it not fill any gaps? we need more russian aircraft.

There are many Russian aircraft, that were built in larger numbers and used actively, unlike the rare bird like Pe-8.

93 planes built, primarily used as night bomber and flown in tactical missions, later in strategic night bombing missions by ADD.

But for example Pe-2, Tu-2 or Il-4 would be much more typical example of Soviet bombers, that were used in the frontlines actively.