There is always a balance that must be struck between reality and game play. Otherwise neither would be had. I believe that the current levels of accuracy and damage are sufficient. I'm not sure how it could be coded, but the damage that a 40mm Bofors (manned or auto ack) can do to a tank at 1000 yards or more seems a bit much.
i was gonna stay out of this one.......but if 80% made it to target, then why did the mighty 8th suspend raids after their second attempt at schweinfurt? (at least that's what i think i read) i think their losses were about 65% at ploesti, around 60% each time at schweinfurt.
Flak is deadly and in this game it is toned down for sure. I lost a 262 once to a 5" from a CV I could not see. They were radar guided after all.
i don't have any issues with the ack in this game. none. nada. zilch. i don/'t wanna die in it, so i just don't fly into it. if i decide to try to de-ack a base, then i deserve whatever i get...same as if i were to follow you into it...... keep it strong as it is.
Unescorted bombers vs. fighters.wrongway
the point was/is ack doesn't have to be accurate. simply throw up a wall, and it pretty much doesn't matter what kind of plane it is.....it's gonna drop.
Actually, I would disagree with this statement.I don't have numbers to back anything up, but if this were true losses of high altitude bombers in formation while flying straight, level, and at a steady speed while on their bomb run would seem to have been suicidal.wrongway
if u need a 190 and 12 rockets to deack a vbase u must really suck at it
