I find this funny was flying from same hoarded base as offending il2 f3 shooter the other day. Hes flying a pos ride if your flying virtually any other ride you have a huge advantage over him not to mention usually numbers alt speed etc etc, but still the tears flowed. Forget f3 how much more of an advantage do some of you need to shoot down a crappy il2 in an uber ride? Lol
A perfectly valid argument.
I still feel that F3 should be limited if only for the reason that IL-2, A-20, etc. drivers could NOT see everything within the sphere of their aircraft. Not even with crewmen.
I would even go so far as to suggest that Lancasters should lose F3 due to the fact that they didn't have ball turret gunners. Surely there must have been a blind spot somewhere.
Seriously, blind spot = NO F3
<S> Melvin
Edit: For those that are in favor of F3, the burden of proof is on your backs. You must prove that there would be 0 blind spots with regards to the flight crew. (As far as this argument goes anyway.)