« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Author Topic: P47N OR p47M  (Read 2089 times)

Offline RTHolmes

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8260
Re: P47N OR p47M
« Reply #15 on: February 07, 2011, 03:06:04 PM »
doesnt the N have a larger, laminar flow wing? which suggest a bit less drag, but less stall warning?
Logged
71 (Eagle) Squadron

What most of us want to do is simply shoot stuff and look good doing it - Chilli

Offline Solar10

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 820
Re: P47N OR p47M
« Reply #16 on: February 07, 2011, 03:11:11 PM »
I agree with JUGgler.  Very different in feel.  Both very capable dog fighters though, although you can't fight them completely the same.

Logged
~Hells Angels~
Solar10

Offline jododger

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 210
Re: P47N OR p47M
« Reply #17 on: February 19, 2011, 07:06:59 PM »
I've had a bunch of fights recently vs JUGgler in some kind of JUG and me in a f6. all seem to end up slow stall fights in the dirt.  I personally would take JUGglers advise on this one. 

That of course is only --  IMO
Logged
Dodger
It's about the fight.

Offline EDO43

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 271
Re: P47N OR p47M
« Reply #18 on: February 19, 2011, 08:04:02 PM »
Quote
EDIT: The M and N have the exact same engine... Horsepower is identical. Only issues are frame-related or weight-related.

not quite Krusty but very close...while you are correct that both engines produced 2800 horsepower in war emergency, the R2800-57 only equipped the first 500 P-47N's built.  The remainder were all equipped with either the R2800-73, -77 or -81.  Yeah, it's picking nits but the engines although similar, had slight differences between them, mainly the ignition system.

REFERENCE:  White, Graham. (2001).  R-2800, Pratt & Whitney's Dependable Masterpiece. Society of Automotive Engineers Publishing, Warrendale, Pa.  (pp. 279, 283, 408-413)
Logged
Mawey -a-  tsmukan

Offline Scherf

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3409
Re: P47N OR p47M
« Reply #19 on: February 19, 2011, 09:08:32 PM »
Could always check out the how-to vid here:

http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?t=106972
Logged
... missions were to be met by the commitment of alerted swarms of fighters, composed of Me 109's and Fw 190's, that were strategically based to protect industrial installations. The inferior capabilities of these fighters against the Mosquitoes made this a hopeless and uneconomical effort. 1.JD KTB

Offline oakranger

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8380
      • http://www.slybirds.com/
Re: P47N OR p47M
« Reply #20 on: February 21, 2011, 10:46:50 PM »
Quote from: JUGgler on February 07, 2011, 01:23:58 PM
The "M" is used for bashing heads
The "N" is used for art!  ;)


JUGgler

LOL.

When i am fighting one of them, i see the big difference.  The N is easy to take on.  Once they lose that E they do not last long in the fight.  Stall is terrible.  When it comes to the M, WOW, tough little bugger to take on.  Love being picked by them.  I have a nice little defensive move that makes them loose that E. 
Logged
Oaktree

56th Fighter group

Offline Imowface

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1124
Re: P47N OR p47M
« Reply #21 on: February 21, 2011, 10:50:57 PM »
they all perform the same when they hit the ground
Logged
Ла-5 Пилот снова
NASA spent 12 million dollars to develop a pen that could work in space, Russia went to space with pencils...

Offline oakranger

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8380
      • http://www.slybirds.com/
Re: P47N OR p47M
« Reply #22 on: February 22, 2011, 12:16:18 AM »
Quote from: Imowface on February 21, 2011, 10:50:57 PM
they all perform the same when they hit the ground


That holds true for all ACs.
Logged
Oaktree

56th Fighter group

Offline STEELE

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 541
Re: P47N OR p47M
« Reply #23 on: February 23, 2011, 03:52:49 AM »
The N will turn tighter, and feels more stable than the M, can definitely feel the extended tail filet and tail
adding stability, especially below say 250, feels more 152ish
Logged
Quote from: Masherbrum on November 18, 2009, 08:32:43 AM
The Kanonenvogel had 6 rounds per pod, this is not even close to being open for debate.
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
« previous next »