Author Topic: F7F TIGERCAT.  (Read 2703 times)

Offline Guppy35

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 20386
Re: F7F TIGERCAT.
« Reply #30 on: February 13, 2011, 08:21:25 PM »
:headscratch: i got ignored, thats why people posted in there whining about how they wanted know helicopters in there ww2 game.

derp.  :rolleyes:

The problem seems to me that you end up looking like you are spamming the wishlist forum with anything you can find, hoping it will stick. 
Dan/CorkyJr
8th FS "Headhunters

Offline Masherbrum

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 22416
Re: F7F TIGERCAT.
« Reply #31 on: February 13, 2011, 09:08:01 PM »
The problem seems to me that you end up looking like you are spamming the wishlist forum with anything you can find, hoping it will stick.  

Now telling him that just spoiled the fun...........or did it have the opposite effect?    :uhoh
FSO Squad 412th FNVG
http://worldfamousfridaynighters.com/
Co-Founder of DFC

Offline 321BAR

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6140
Re: F7F TIGERCAT.
« Reply #32 on: February 14, 2011, 12:20:30 AM »
By far the most beautiful plane from the 1940's :aok


But it has no place in AHII
I am in need of a new epic quote
Happy Jack's Go Buggy

Offline LLogann

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4947
      • Candidz.com
Re: F7F TIGERCAT.
« Reply #33 on: February 14, 2011, 12:23:17 AM »
Or..... Let's say it another way...............

For somebody that has been around the last 5 years, he is obvi a liar, or has his................


See Rule #4
Now I only pay because of my friends.

Offline 321BAR

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6140
Re: F7F TIGERCAT.
« Reply #34 on: February 14, 2011, 12:28:32 AM »
Or..... Let's say it another way...............

For somebody that has been around the last 5 years, he is obvi a liar, or has his................
(Image removed from quote.)


:rofl two threads for one llogann. well done :aok
I am in need of a new epic quote
Happy Jack's Go Buggy

Offline LLogann

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4947
      • Candidz.com
Re: F7F TIGERCAT.
« Reply #35 on: February 14, 2011, 12:34:23 AM »
I try    :salute  But trying too hard, the only thing keeping me up is his Polish replies.........Plus his CO isn't on the forums so no way to actually prove he is part of a squad, I thought, were good people.   
:rofl two threads for one llogann. well done :aok
See Rule #4
Now I only pay because of my friends.

Offline Tyrannis

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3931
Re: F7F TIGERCAT.
« Reply #36 on: February 14, 2011, 12:38:19 AM »
Or..... Let's say it another way...............

For somebody that has been around the last 5 years, he is obvi a liar, or has his................
(Image removed from quote.)


seems more like your the one in that pic llogan.

ive had you raging mad for two full nights.

so bad youve felt the need to fail-troll me in allmost every post i make (nomatter what thread its in).

plus, you even resorted to mom jokes. which any sensible person knows is a beaten man's last resort.

for someone who uses the hook icon alot, your not very good at recognizing it.   :D

Offline TOMCAT21

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1648
Re: F7F TIGERCAT.
« Reply #37 on: February 16, 2011, 08:49:55 PM »
The Tigercat was intended for use on the Midway-class carriers and was deployed to Marine Corps units but never saw combat.
RETIRED US Army/ Flying and dying since Tour 80/"We're paratroopers, Lieutenant, we're supposed to be surrounded." - Capt. Richard Winters.  FSO 412th FNVG/MA- REGULATORS

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: F7F TIGERCAT.
« Reply #38 on: February 16, 2011, 09:07:07 PM »
The Tigercat was intended for use on the Midway-class carriers and was deployed to Marine Corps units but never saw combat.

Never saw combat in WW2 but did see some early action in Korea, pretty sure it even scored two kills on biplanes in Korea.


ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline TOMCAT21

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1648
Re: F7F TIGERCAT.
« Reply #39 on: February 16, 2011, 09:10:15 PM »
I sit correct ACK.  :salute
RETIRED US Army/ Flying and dying since Tour 80/"We're paratroopers, Lieutenant, we're supposed to be surrounded." - Capt. Richard Winters.  FSO 412th FNVG/MA- REGULATORS

Offline fullmetalbullet

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 834
Re: F7F TIGERCAT.
« Reply #40 on: February 16, 2011, 09:33:51 PM »
were there any US navy or british navy twin engine aircraft that flew in combat, and off carriers in WW2. or was it just single engine aircraft? i do agrre that some of the rarer aircraft should be included that did fly during world war 2, like the F7F and the Meteor, but prioritize the needed and the aircraft that did see action even if it was only once that they did. i also agree that the B-29 should be added in for several reasons, 1 it will stop the constant wishes for the B-29 and it did do alot of good deeds for the USAAF in the pacific, and it ended the war. but i would have gone with another aircraft to be added first, but sadly it wasnt on the list so i couldnt have voted for it so i would have voted the B-29. but as i was saying give these rarer aircraft a chance aswell, like the F7F, and TA 154 it did get put into service but was never used from what i heard, and heres another one that would be interesting to see and fly the Fa 223. but leave the rarer aircraft for later on, maybe years later after they fill the list up with much more needed aircraft.
« Last Edit: February 16, 2011, 09:53:13 PM by fullmetalbullet »
"Cry Havoc, And Let Slip The Dogs Of War" Julius Caesar


Offline 321BAR

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6140
Re: F7F TIGERCAT.
« Reply #41 on: February 17, 2011, 12:55:41 AM »
were there any US navy or british navy twin engine aircraft that flew in combat, and off carriers in WW2. or was it just single engine aircraft? i do agrre that some of the rarer aircraft should be included that did fly during world war 2, like the F7F and the Meteor, but prioritize the needed and the aircraft that did see action even if it was only once that they did. i also agree that the B-29 should be added in for several reasons, 1 it will stop the constant wishes for the B-29 and it did do alot of good deeds for the USAAF in the pacific, and it ended the war. but i would have gone with another aircraft to be added first, but sadly it wasnt on the list so i couldnt have voted for it so i would have voted the B-29. but as i was saying give these rarer aircraft a chance aswell, like the F7F, and TA 154 it did get put into service but was never used from what i heard, and heres another one that would be interesting to see and fly the Fa 223. but leave the rarer aircraft for later on, maybe years later after they fill the list up with much more needed aircraft.
meteor saw combat correct? F7F didnt so it will not be added to AH
I am in need of a new epic quote
Happy Jack's Go Buggy

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: F7F TIGERCAT.
« Reply #42 on: February 17, 2011, 02:52:03 AM »
meteor saw combat correct? F7F didnt so it will not be added to AH

Yep, the Meteor saw some action shooting down Buzz Bombs.

ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline fullmetalbullet

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 834
Re: F7F TIGERCAT.
« Reply #43 on: February 17, 2011, 04:07:04 AM »
but the point is. even if it didnt see combat, and was is service in numbers, and in squads. it should still be added. one to honor those who did fly them in world war 2, and two so that we can give those planes a chance to fight in a war they were built to fight in.
"Cry Havoc, And Let Slip The Dogs Of War" Julius Caesar


Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: F7F TIGERCAT.
« Reply #44 on: February 17, 2011, 04:19:14 AM »
but the point is. even if it didnt see combat, and was is service in numbers, and in squads. it should still be added. one to honor those who did fly them in world war 2, and two so that we can give those planes a chance to fight in a war they were built to fight in.


i don't see the point of adding a plane that was only in theater for a month or so before the war ended and never saw combat or was in transit to the area of operations when the war ended.

ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song