Author Topic: nuke for new superfortress  (Read 2703 times)

Offline MachFly

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6296
Re: nuke for new superfortress
« Reply #15 on: February 27, 2011, 04:46:28 PM »
I almost never say never, an exception to that is an atomic bomb.
We have said before that we'll never do an atomic bomb.
"Now, if I had to make the choice of one fighter aircraft above all the others...it would be, without any doubt, the world's greatest propeller driven flying machine - the magnificent and immortal Spitfire."
Lt. Col. William R. Dunn
flew Spitfires, Hurricanes, P-51s, P-47s, and F-4s

Offline jolly22

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1587
Re: nuke for new superfortress
« Reply #16 on: February 27, 2011, 05:18:38 PM »

3./JG 53 cheerleader - Battle Over The Winter Line - FLY AXIS - JRjolly

Offline BigKev03

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 256
Re: nuke for new superfortress
« Reply #17 on: February 27, 2011, 06:51:30 PM »
Sure put the nuke in the game.  But if used the radioactive fallout will put an area of gird squares unusable and no once can enter. :devil

-1 on this

BigKev

Offline Vadjan-Sama

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 233
Re: nuke for new superfortress
« Reply #18 on: February 28, 2011, 12:46:26 AM »
It will not fit in the bomb bay.

 :neener:


wrongway

Touche...
"I wish people would use the wish list forum to post their brilliant ideas, and be smart enough to not post all their stupid ones.

But I am under no disillusions of my wish ever being fulfilled."

HiTech

Offline olds442

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2239
Re: nuke for new superfortress
« Reply #19 on: February 28, 2011, 06:36:20 AM »
ya i can see it now people droping atomic bombs on sheep
only a moron would use Dolby positioning in a game.
IGN: cutlass "shovels and rakes and implements of destruction"

Offline BowHTR

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2074
Re: nuke for new superfortress
« Reply #20 on: February 28, 2011, 08:19:06 AM »
ya i can see it now people droping atomic bombs on sheep

the sheeps are missing  :frown:
AH Supporter Since Tour 35

Offline HawkerMKII

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1133
Re: nuke for new superfortress
« Reply #21 on: February 28, 2011, 09:00:57 AM »
 :bhead NO!
8th of November 1965, 173RD Airborne <S>

Offline Tyrannis

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3931
Re: nuke for new superfortress
« Reply #22 on: February 28, 2011, 11:10:17 AM »
i wonder how many ppl logged on, saw the b29's bomb options, looked at the 4,000lber bomb (without clicking it) and immediatly thought "n00k!!!!!!".  :lol



ive started calling the 4,000lbers n00ks just because they sort of resemble tiny nukes.


and speaking of tiny nukes...


i request MINI-NUKES!  :O



droped from a b29 named "pearl" that was raised from lake mead & restored by the boomers.

these mini nukes were used in the battle for hoover dam to carpet bomb the legion to its knees.


they'd be perfect for aceshigh  :aok
http://fallout.wikia.com/wiki/Mini_nuke_(Fallout:_New_Vegas)


Offline VonMessa

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11922
Re: nuke for new superfortress
« Reply #23 on: February 28, 2011, 11:13:49 AM »
i wonder how many ppl logged on, saw the b29's bomb options, looked at the 4,000lber bomb (without clicking it) and immediatly thought "n00k!!!!!!".  :lol



ive started calling the 4,000lbers n00ks just because they sort of resemble tiny nukes.


and speaking of tiny nukes...


i request MINI-NUKES!  :O
(Image removed from quote.)


droped from a b29 named "pearl" that was raised from lake mead & restored by the boomers.

these mini nukes were used in the battle for hoover dam to carpet bomb the legion to its knees.


they'd be perfect for aceshigh  :aok
http://fallout.wikia.com/wiki/Mini_nuke_(Fallout:_New_Vegas)



Just in case you missed it above...

  We have said before that we'll never do an atomic bomb.
Braümeister und Schmutziger Hund von JG11


We are all here because we are not all there.

Offline Guppy35

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 20386
Re: nuke for new superfortress
« Reply #24 on: February 28, 2011, 02:28:58 PM »
Just keep in mind that the B29s in Aces High are more often then not being flown by "Fat men" or "Little Boys"
Dan/CorkyJr
8th FS "Headhunters

Offline gyrene81

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11629
Re: nuke for new superfortress
« Reply #25 on: February 28, 2011, 02:53:10 PM »
Just keep in mind that the B29s in Aces High are more often then not being flown by "Fat men" or "Little Boys"
:rofl  :lol  :rofl  :lol  :aok
jarhed  
Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day...
Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. - Terry Pratchett

Offline olds442

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2239
Re: nuke for new superfortress
« Reply #26 on: February 28, 2011, 04:15:04 PM »
ya i can see it now people droping atomic bombs on sheep
YA because the B29 dweebs nooked them
only a moron would use Dolby positioning in a game.
IGN: cutlass "shovels and rakes and implements of destruction"

Offline Puck

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2980
Re: nuke for new superfortress
« Reply #27 on: February 28, 2011, 04:50:17 PM »
It's action that counts, not words...

Just to make this easy we'll call Fat Man a 15KT device.  15,000 tons is 30,000,000 pounds.  Once B-29 can carry 20,000 pounds, so 15KT is roughly equal to 1,500 B-29 loads.  There are three B-29s in a formation, so a 15KT device would only take 500 sorties. 

...if you start now you will just about have enough time to haul the whole thing before the resolutions are passed and the clever speeches end...
//c coad  c coad run  run coad run
main (){char _[]={"S~||(iuv{nkx%K9Y$hzhhd\x0c"},__
,___=1;for(__=___>>___;__<((___<<___<<___<<___<<___
)+(___<<___<<___<<___)-___);__+=___)putchar((_[__
])+(__/((___<<___)+___))-((___&

Offline AWwrgwy

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5478
Re: nuke for new superfortress
« Reply #28 on: February 28, 2011, 06:15:49 PM »
It's action that counts, not words...

Just to make this easy we'll call Fat Man a 15KT device.  15,000 tons is 30,000,000 pounds.  Once B-29 can carry 20,000 pounds, so 15KT is roughly equal to 1,500 B-29 loads.  There are three B-29s in a formation, so a 15KT device would only take 500 sorties. 

...if you start now you will just about have enough time to haul the whole thing before the resolutions are passed and the clever speeches end...

Except it will not physically fit in the bomb bay of the B-29 we have in game... still.


wrongway
71 (Eagle) Squadron
"THAT"S PAINT!!"

"If nothing else works, a total pig-headed unwillingness to look facts in the face will see us through."
- General Sir Anthony Cecil Hogmanay

Offline skorpion

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3798
Re: nuke for new superfortress
« Reply #29 on: February 28, 2011, 07:31:41 PM »
i wonder how many ppl logged on, saw the b29's bomb options, looked at the 4,000lber bomb (without clicking it) and immediatly thought "n00k!!!!!!".  :lol



ive started calling the 4,000lbers n00ks just because they sort of resemble tiny nukes.


and speaking of tiny nukes...


i request MINI-NUKES!  :O
(Image removed from quote.)


droped from a b29 named "pearl" that was raised from lake mead & restored by the boomers.

these mini nukes were used in the battle for hoover dam to carpet bomb the legion to its knees.


they'd be perfect for aceshigh  :aok
http://fallout.wikia.com/wiki/Mini_nuke_(Fallout:_New_Vegas)



You have also been playing fallout new vegas lately havent you? i have that game and i think its pretty darn good. but...i dont remember seeing any mininukes that helped the NCR over the Leigon at the hoover dam..."WIKI IS NOT RELIABLE SOURCE!" <--words from the greatest reasearch cat in the world...