Town occupancy

[Tank-Ace]

yeah, just something that doesn't make it look like its a ghost town, i swear i roll into town and it feels like I'm watching the movie silent hill...

I want babes in lawnchairs to look at while I'm driving my LVT up the beach.


+1 though. Some sandbags and barbedwire, maybe an (unmanned) AT gun hiding in the bushes somewhere.

[ozrocker]

+1 and hey, how about the town Otis? every town has at least 1 wino right?




                                                                                                            Oz

[flight17]

its already been made impossible to take towns unless by a hording squad... you want to make it even harder?

[Tank-Ace]

No, I just want eyecandy. Nothing that will actually impede capture, it will just look cooler. Its the same thing as updating our troops. They were fine before, they just didn't look all that great.

[Skyguns MKII]

No, I just want eyecandy. Nothing that will actually impede capture, it will just look cooler. Its the same thing as updating our troops. They were fine before, they just didn't look all that great.

be nice to have AI troops that actually did something other than run in a straight line to the maproom

[B-17]

Skyguns... +100000000000000 to this idea. I love it. Not really having many new things that actually DO anything IMPORTANT, just like what a previous poster said: "milk truck" or something. I think it was MarineUS.

I'd REALLY like to see some anti tank traps, and at least things that don't make the town feel like one of those nuclear test towns... :bolt

[Rob52240]

its already been made impossible to take towns unless by a hording squad... you want to make it even harder?

Wrong!

[ebfd11]

+1 to the tank traps on the beach and maybe add 2 manned guns in towns to help defend it.

[Scotty55OEFVet]

How about this....use the idea of having troops running around town, ports, etc and you get perks and damage points for killing em? Same as destroying Dar, ord bunkers etc but give it a little more variety when shooting up towns, ports and bases...thoughts?

[Chilli]

I have never particularly cared for representing straffing infantry men.   Now, if they are manning AA against my aircraft, or have bazookas for my tank......

[vNUCKS]

its already been made impossible to take towns unless by a hording squad... you want to make it even harder?

Wow, so now a single box of Lancasters, or a solo A8 and an M3 is a horde?

[alpini13]

its a great idea, but it should only go into effect if someone ups from the base and drops off troops...10 troops  maybe 3 areas active........3 troops  one area of the town active.

[Skyguns MKII]

its a great idea, but it should only go into effect if someone ups from the base and drops off troops...10 troops  maybe 3 areas active........3 troops  one area of the town active.

there should be a standard number defending town before any are dropped and considered "reinforcements'

[Tank-Ace]

well yeah, but AH doesn't take into account the random path of shell and bomb fragments. If somethings within *x distance* of *y sized blast* it dies, 0 chance that the shell or bomb-fragments missed the gun crew.

[Skyguns MKII]

well yeah, but AH doesn't take into account the random path of shell and bomb fragments. If somethings within *x distance* of *y sized blast* it dies, 0 chance that the shell or bomb-fragments missed the gun crew.

true but it would give the 100 pnders objectives. Imagine for 1 minute a infantry mortar position on the beaches with tanktraps