Subscribed...I wonder if it's published some where... I know it's changed a lot over the last year or so...
pyro has made several announcements on the radar changes...lots of ensuing questions and the ever present
Okay then, show me one that represents the current settings. Using the search, the last one Pyro posted was 65ft, and I know that isn't right.
Okay then, show me one that represents the current settings. Using the search, the last one Pyro posted was 65ft, and I know that isn't right. I am not trying to be mean, but if you post something like this, then provide link to a forum post, or official announcement from HTC. Your less than useful post has done nothing but increase your post count, and prove your "value". It's clear by the several different answers included so far, no one is quite sure, and it's not easy to find.
well...there are 4 people from htc who regularly post in these forums...if the pyro search only revealed the 65ft announcement then it could have been hitech, skuzzy or sudz...i know sudz hasn't posted anything to do with radar that would leave hitech or skuzzy...did a search under skuzzy and got no good return...search for keyword radar with user hitech found this little tidbit...note the date:http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/index.php/topic,308564.msg3984932.html#msg3984932i hope that is helpful in answering your question...and you're welcome.
The last time I checked it was 65' AGL for dot and 500' AGL for bar.
Does that seem sorta backwards to anyone else?I think of bar as a lower resolution info. (i.e. We know they are somewhere in the sector, but we don't know where.)I think of dot dar as high resolution info. (i.e. Ah hah. We know where they are now. Here is their dot and we will track their position.)Seems like bar should be the lower threshold and dot be the higher so you have a graduation of information depending on how high (how visible to radar) the target is.,Wab