Author Topic: Fiat G.55/l  (Read 3831 times)

Offline Butcher

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5323
Re: Fiat G.55/l
« Reply #30 on: December 11, 2011, 11:48:05 AM »
such a beautiful plane, oh how I wish for Christmas :\
JG 52

Offline Butcher

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5323
Re: Fiat G.55/l
« Reply #31 on: June 25, 2012, 05:32:10 PM »
Bringing down the G.55 wish again, I did some research and well over 245 were built and served in quite a few squadrons for Northern Italy during WW2.

Although its not a Late war monster, it would be at the tail end of Midwar/ Early Late war.
JG 52

Offline Tank-Ace

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5298
Re: Fiat G.55/l
« Reply #32 on: June 25, 2012, 05:52:42 PM »
+1000000000





And it might even help sate my lust for the Re.2005.
You started this thread and it was obviously about your want and desire in spite of your use of 'we' and Google.

"Once more unto the breach"

Offline Borgoo

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 36
      • http://www.andreasalvi.com
Re: Fiat G.55/l
« Reply #33 on: June 27, 2012, 05:51:23 PM »
+1000000000000000000000000 :aok
but we need also new 3D model of 205 and 202...and Tempest.... :bolt:
Andrea "Borgoo" Salvi
~<<~Loose Deuce~>>~

Offline Ruah

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1083
Re: Fiat G.55/l
« Reply #34 on: June 27, 2012, 11:54:39 PM »
+1000000000000000000000000 :aok
but we need also new 3D model of 205 and 202...and Tempest.... :bolt:

and the yak and the list goes on and on

Kommando Nowotny
I/JG 77, 2nd Staffel
Mediterranean Maelstrom
HORRIDO

Offline Borgoo

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 36
      • http://www.andreasalvi.com
Re: Fiat G.55/l
« Reply #35 on: June 28, 2012, 06:14:36 AM »
and the yak and the list goes on and on

of course!! ive only forgot the others one"
Andrea "Borgoo" Salvi
~<<~Loose Deuce~>>~

Offline Slade

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1848
Re: Fiat G.55/l
« Reply #36 on: June 28, 2012, 08:46:48 AM »
+1
-- Flying as X15 --

Offline HighTone

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1299
      • Squad Site
Re: Fiat G.55/l
« Reply #37 on: June 28, 2012, 10:43:49 AM »
If its anything like all the other jap fighters, 1 20mm from the b29s tail gun will set that thing burning.

Get a book and try reading something for yourself before spouting something you heard about Japanese aircraft on the History Channel. Most if not all of the second generation Japanese aircraft had pilot armor and self sealing fuel tanks (albit bit not as much or as effective as there Allied counterparts)

But a nice try at baiting none the less. I mean I fell for it.

LCA Special Events CO     LCA ~Tainan Kokutai~       
www.lcasquadron.org      Thanks for the Oscar HTC

Offline Mar

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2203
Re: Fiat G.55/l
« Reply #38 on: June 28, 2012, 10:52:13 AM »
But a nice try at baiting none the less.

Same to you bud. Notice the date of the post, and the Persona Non Grata.
𝒻𝓇𝑜𝓂 𝓉𝒽𝑒 𝓈𝒽𝒶𝒹𝑜𝓌𝓈 𝑜𝒻 𝓌𝒶𝓇'𝓈 𝓅𝒶𝓈𝓉 𝒶 𝒹𝑒𝓂𝑜𝓃 𝑜𝒻 𝓉𝒽𝑒 𝒶𝒾𝓇 𝓇𝒾𝓈𝑒𝓈 𝒻𝓇𝑜𝓂 𝓉𝒽𝑒 𝑔𝓇𝒶𝓋𝑒

  "Onward to the land of kings—via the sky of aces!"
  Oh, and zack1234 rules. :old:

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: Fiat G.55/l
« Reply #39 on: June 28, 2012, 05:30:24 PM »
Now, now, no bickering.

One thing I'd love for the G.55 is the Serie 0 option.


The first planes had a hub 20mm gun, but 4x 12.7mm Breda SAFAT MGs, two on top of the nose and two below the nose, all synchronized.

Later models removed these lower 2 guns, due to difficulties in accessing them for servicing and reloading. Probably for lack of firepower, too. They put the cannons in the wings.

Serie 0:
4x 12.7mm
1x 20mm

Serie 1:
2x 12.7mm
3x 20mm

It would be a nice option like the 7mm wing guns on our C.202 and C.205, not the most powerful, but interesting for variety.

Offline Butcher

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5323
Re: Fiat G.55/l
« Reply #40 on: June 28, 2012, 07:45:45 PM »
Now, now, no bickering.

One thing I'd love for the G.55 is the Serie 0 option.


The first planes had a hub 20mm gun, but 4x 12.7mm Breda SAFAT MGs, two on top of the nose and two below the nose, all synchronized.

Later models removed these lower 2 guns, due to difficulties in accessing them for servicing and reloading. Probably for lack of firepower, too. They put the cannons in the wings.

Serie 0:
4x 12.7mm
1x 20mm

Serie 1:
2x 12.7mm
3x 20mm

It would be a nice option like the 7mm wing guns on our C.202 and C.205, not the most powerful, but interesting for variety.

I haven't found any with the 7mm wing guns, but I have seen both Serie 0 and Serie 1 in combat (squadron size) It certainly would be interesting to see differences in flight performance between the two.
JG 52

Offline Tank-Ace

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5298
Re: Fiat G.55/l
« Reply #41 on: June 28, 2012, 10:58:04 PM »
I think he meant it would be interesting to see both options for the G.55, simmilar to the 7mm guns in the wings of the C202 and 205.
You started this thread and it was obviously about your want and desire in spite of your use of 'we' and Google.

"Once more unto the breach"

Offline Butcher

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5323
Re: Fiat G.55/l
« Reply #42 on: June 28, 2012, 11:22:24 PM »
I think he meant it would be interesting to see both options for the G.55, simmilar to the 7mm guns in the wings of the C202 and 205.

Difference is I seen photos of both options in the G.55, I cannot show proof c202/205 had different options, then again this thread is about the G.55 which had both series in combat.
I can prove the C.205 had drop tanks in combat, although the handful of 2-3 photos have circulated the internet for years, its not exactly 100% proof, however what else can anyone go on since there is no actual proof or data, even then it was common in north africa, not afterwards.

Want to lose the 7mm option for the C202 and C.205 get your own thread for it, not the topic which says Fiat G.55, different aircraft and production model.
JG 52

Offline Tank-Ace

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5298
Re: Fiat G.55/l
« Reply #43 on: June 29, 2012, 12:22:41 AM »
Difference is I seen photos of both options in the G.55, I cannot show proof c202/205 had different options, then again this thread is about the G.55 which had both series in combat.
I can prove the C.205 had drop tanks in combat, although the handful of 2-3 photos have circulated the internet for years, its not exactly 100% proof, however what else can anyone go on since there is no actual proof or data, even then it was common in north africa, not afterwards.

Want to lose the 7mm option for the C202 and C.205 get your own thread for it, not the topic which says Fiat G.55, different aircraft and production model.

Butcher, you're either tired, drunk, senile, or trying to pull the same crap you did in the Panzer III thread.

I said nothing about wanting the 7mm's removed from the C.202 and C.205. I simply tried to clarify what Krusty was saying, as you seemed to be confused (you still seem to be confused), and then you proceded to hijack your own thread with meanderings about lack of proof, drop tanks, and hijacks.
You started this thread and it was obviously about your want and desire in spite of your use of 'we' and Google.

"Once more unto the breach"

Offline Butcher

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5323
Re: Fiat G.55/l
« Reply #44 on: June 29, 2012, 07:34:24 AM »
Butcher, you're either tired, drunk, senile, or trying to pull the same crap you did in the Panzer III thread.

I said nothing about wanting the 7mm's removed from the C.202 and C.205. I simply tried to clarify what Krusty was saying, as you seemed to be confused (you still seem to be confused), and then you proceded to hijack your own thread with meanderings about lack of proof, drop tanks, and hijacks.

You are Hijacking my wish thread with your own gibberish attempt to troll, not the place - I answered to Krusty's Post above ^.
You don't have a clue about what Krusty is talking about, or the C.202/205 rather.
« Last Edit: June 29, 2012, 07:44:00 AM by Butcher »
JG 52