What made me laugh was the "Since my company hasn't made anything like it - it can't exist." type phrase.
Granted I'm no specialist, nor do I claim to be. I just find the arrogance of that statement laughable. 
I'm not saying it can't exist Marine. What I'm saying is that the assumption of their 'high efficiency' does not mean %100. In fact, no efficiency numbers are even stated. The fly's eye is a very good idea, but it does not increase the actual efficiency of the cell itself, it increases the efficiency of the fixture's ability to collect light.
What's 'high efficiency' to one company might be low compared to others, and vice versa. Our cells were invented specifically for the space industry, because of high efficiency, light weight, and being robust. We've just begun getting in to the terrestrial market, because our cost has been dropping rapidly, to where a concentrator assembly
is cost efficient for some.
Sure the paint can exist. But what is the efficiency? I haven't seen it yet.