Author Topic: A-26  (Read 1870 times)

Offline Stoney

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3482
Re: A-26
« Reply #15 on: April 21, 2011, 12:38:11 AM »
I was wondering when we'd see one of these again...  Its been, what, a week since the last one?
"Can we be incorrect at times, absolutely, but I do believe 15 years of experience does deserve a little more credence and respect than you have given from your very first post."

HiTech

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Re: A-26
« Reply #16 on: April 21, 2011, 12:45:33 AM »
Why not let them have the A-26?  You get to repeatedly shoot them out of the sky when they try to fly it like a fighter. :devil
I have no say in whether they get it or not, and they will get it eventually, which I have no problems with.  I do think that many other things should be added first, but I would support the A-26 being added before something like the B7A 'Grace' or Ki-102.

I am just warning those of them who base their expectations on their memories of AW that they will not get what they think they'll get.  Anybody trying to use it as an air superiority fighter is in for a rude shock.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline guncrasher

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17425
Re: A-26
« Reply #17 on: April 21, 2011, 04:48:29 AM »
If I can turn fite a fiter in my b26, I shouldnt have no problem with the a26.  but we mostly want to use it as bomber/town killer.

semp
you dont want me to ho, dont point your plane at me.

Offline cobia38

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1258
Re: A-26
« Reply #18 on: April 21, 2011, 06:28:01 AM »
Why not let them have the A-26?  You get to repeatedly shoot them out of the sky when they try to fly it like a fighter. :devil
   
 who said anything about flying it as a fighter ? we just want it because its cute/sexy/fast/carrys bombs/has guns   :cheers:
   


  Harvesting taters,one  K4 at a time

Offline Volron

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5805
Re: A-26
« Reply #19 on: April 21, 2011, 08:09:05 AM »
I have no say in whether they get it or not, and they will get it eventually, which I have no problems with.  I do think that many other things should be added first, but I would support the A-26 being added before something like the B7A 'Grace' or Ki-102.

I am just warning those of them who base their expectations on their memories of AW that they will not get what they think they'll get.  Anybody trying to use it as an air superiority fighter is in for a rude shock.

I agree that other things should come first.  If the A-26 made it's way in though, I'd fly it.

   
 who said anything about flying it as a fighter ? we just want it because its cute/sexy/fast/carrys bombs/has guns   :cheers:
   

Well, I didn't mean EVERYONE would try to fly it like a fighter. :lol


Makes me want to ask, if you could choose just ONE plane to be added next and it was between the A26 and Beaufighter, which would make the cut? :devil
Quote from: hitech
Wow I find it hard to believe it has been almost 38 days since our last path. We should have release another 38 versions by now  :bhead
HiTech
Quote from: Pyro
Quote from: Jolly
What on Earth makes you think that i said that sir?!
My guess would be scotch.

Offline Dichotomy

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12391
Re: A-26
« Reply #20 on: April 21, 2011, 08:32:39 AM »
If I can turn fite a fiter in my b26, I shouldnt have no problem with the a26.  but we mostly want to use it as bomber/town killer.

semp

And put fires out with it



 :bolt:
JG11 - Dicho37Only The Proud Only The Strong AH Players who've passed on :salute

Offline Ping

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 957
Re: A-26
« Reply #21 on: April 21, 2011, 03:57:32 PM »
And put fires out with it


So use it to put the hanger fires out so hangers re-up faster :)
I/JG2 Enemy Coast Ahead


Offline minke

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 619
Re: A-26
« Reply #22 on: April 21, 2011, 04:06:57 PM »
Didn't the engine nacelles give it poor visibility? Iirc wasnt it a pig to fly?

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Re: A-26
« Reply #23 on: April 21, 2011, 10:45:52 PM »
If I can turn fite a fiter in my b26
Any fighter should win this fight.  The fights you win doing it are not testimony to your skill, they are testimony to the lack of skill on the part of your opponent.

While wing loading isn't everything, it is a crude measure and the A-26's wing loading is very high.

Didn't the engine nacelles give it poor visibility? Iirc wasnt it a pig to fly?
I don't know about it being a pig to fly, but yes, the engine nacelles to block the visibility to the sides.  That is, if I understand correctly, the reason it was rejected for service in the Pacific Theater in favor of keeping the A-20s in service.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline guncrasher

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17425
Re: A-26
« Reply #24 on: April 22, 2011, 12:34:10 AM »
Any fighter should win this fight.  The fights you win doing it are not testimony to your skill, they are testimony to the lack of skill on the part of your opponent.

While wing loading isn't everything, it is a crude measure and the A-26's wing loading is very high.
I don't know about it being a pig to fly, but yes, the engine nacelles to block the visibility to the sides.  That is, if I understand correctly, the reason it was rejected for service in the Pacific Theater in favor of keeping the A-20s in service.

2 of them were rated top 20.  It's not lack of skill on their part.  had I been some guy that flies that a20, you wouldnt question skill.  but that's life.  btw it helps that i can type 80 wpm, so i can switch from gunner position to pilot back to gunner faster than you can turn.

semp
you dont want me to ho, dont point your plane at me.

Offline Soulyss

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6559
      • Aces High Events
Re: A-26
« Reply #25 on: April 22, 2011, 12:45:27 AM »
Didn't the engine nacelles give it poor visibility? Iirc wasnt it a pig to fly?

While wing loading isn't everything, it is a crude measure and the A-26's wing loading is very high.
I don't know about it being a pig to fly, but yes, the engine nacelles to block the visibility to the sides.  That is, if I understand correctly, the reason it was rejected for service in the Pacific Theater in favor of keeping the A-20s in service.

That was a large part of it.  The A-26's were very poorly suited to the mission profiles being flown in the Pacific, the 3rd Bomb Group was asked to fly some combat missions and report back on the performance of the new plane and they didn't have a lot of good things to say about it.  

Henebry talks about it in his book.
Quote
The low keyed missions did give us the opportunity to focus on the plane.  Although we agree the flying characteristics of the plane were excellent - good range, good bomb load, good engines - our overall reactions as low level bomber pilots were negative.

The cockpit arrangements were inefficient. Pilot visibility was hampered, making the minimum altitude formation flying so necessary to our bombing and strafing attacks awkward.  Both engines extended far forward of the pilots position, at a level with his line of sight to the left, to the right, and to the rear.  It was like flying in a slit trench.  Couldn't see down; couldn't see level.  All you could see was up.  That put pilots flying formation witha  lead flying minimum altitude hanging on coconut trees or ship masts, or riding up his tail.

Inside a very wide cockpit, too wide for a single pilot airplane, was the seat and one control column placed on the left side, further disabling the pilot's right visibility, the bomb bay doors were activated by a lever located forward to the right of the pilot seat forcing him to bend down and forward to each it, again inhibiting his ability to see.

In all his pilots composed a list of 32 grievances which he took all the way up to General Kenney, who told him to take them straight to the Pentagon. He was told, "You go on home and tell them why we don't need it or want it! We'll stay with our B-25's, A-20's, and B-24's."
« Last Edit: April 22, 2011, 12:49:49 AM by Soulyss »
80th FS "Headhunters"
I blame mir.

Offline moot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 16333
      • http://www.dasmuppets.com
verticalize
« Reply #26 on: April 22, 2011, 12:53:18 AM »
Semp the B26 is nowhere near competitive with any fighter in the set, including the worse turners.  I'd be surprised if even the 262 or 190A8 can't do more than equal the 26's turns not just on paper but in practice, i.e. oblique sustained.
Hello ant
running very fast
I squish you

Offline guncrasher

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17425
Re: A-26
« Reply #27 on: April 22, 2011, 03:36:39 AM »
Semp the B26 is nowhere near competitive with any fighter in the set, including the worse turners.  I'd be surprised if even the 262 or 190A8 can't do more than equal the 26's turns not just on paper but in practice, i.e. oblique sustained.

It's not the turning, it's the gunners that will kill you, like i said while you are busy trying to get a shot, i am already shooting at you from any angle you are coming at me.  like I said, i can type fast and sure as heck can switch from gunner to pilot and back faster than you can say, he cheated :).

semp
you dont want me to ho, dont point your plane at me.

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Re: A-26
« Reply #28 on: April 22, 2011, 05:33:21 AM »
It's not the turning, it's the gunners that will kill you, like i said while you are busy trying to get a shot, i am already shooting at you from any angle you are coming at me.  like I said, i can type fast and sure as heck can switch from gunner to pilot and back faster than you can say, he cheated :).

semp
Which has precisely nothing to do with your earlier claim of turn fighting top 20 fighter drivers in AH.  The A-26 does not have the tools to do what you describe.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline guncrasher

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17425
Re: A-26
« Reply #29 on: April 22, 2011, 12:23:04 PM »
Which has precisely nothing to do with your earlier claim of turn fighting top 20 fighter drivers in AH.  The A-26 does not have the tools to do what you describe.

we'll see when it gets here.  I never said i could out turn all fighters, some i can and use the main gun, for those that i cant, I'll use the gunner positions.  either way it's turn fighting. 

semp
you dont want me to ho, dont point your plane at me.