I don't think the vid was "IN" worthy, but my problem is that it's just a glorification of the bad side that so many "race fans" only seem to want to see....
This is what I despise about "some" forms of racing and its fans.... the TV coverage and ratings interests keep the rules structured in a way that there are plenty of wrecks and carnage, because the fans don't want to go home from the race without having seen the "big one" where 15+ cars pile up at 180mph and at least a few get airborne, and if a driver is killed every few years everybody is sad, T-shirt and hat sales with that driver's number will go up, they'll implement some rudamentary safety measures, but the wrecks must be kept an integral part of the action because the fans want blood, drama, and twisted metal. Good close racing is not enough... they want the gladiators to kill each other... the more cautions, the better..... it's sickening.
"wear your seatbelts"...... it wasn't until the '50's or '60's the even a lap belt was used, much less a shoulder belt or 4 or 5 point harness. Fuel cells? Nah, this fuel tank that will rupture on impact will be fine. Fire suit? What's that? This cotton shirt and jeans will be fine. Roll cage? BAH!
Hey, look, lets put a big oak tree right in the runoff erea on the outside of a 100mph turn. Ask Jim Clark about the virtue of trees on the outside of turns.
Danger was and always will be part of motor racing. And YES, there is an assumed risk and each and every one of those guys knew what they were risking.
BUT, the point has always been and should still be the racing.... not the crashing and the inevitable injury and death that results, especially back then. This vid did nothing to glorify the racing... it only glorified the damage and death that resulted when it went wrong. But hey, it had a great song.
Maybe that was the point. I really don't know.