Author Topic: C-47 inappropriately named?  (Read 771 times)

Offline Raptor05121

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 486
C-47 inappropriately named?
« on: June 04, 2011, 02:03:34 AM »
There's a "DC-3" here locally getting restored. On the AAC serial plate, its listed as a C-53D. Quickly browsing Wiki, its shows the C-47 as a transport/cargo plane and the C-53 as a C-47 but a sturdier floor and larger door specifically made for paratroop application. Certifying this claim is that the "DC-3" getting restored was used in the paratroop drops on D-day and even pulled some CG-4A Wacos.

tl;dr- Should the name be changed to C-53 or am I missing something?
InGame: xRaptorx of the ***Alchemists***

Quote from: dirtdart
To suggest things that do not meet this basic criteria is equal to masturbation.  It may feel good to you, will not produce any tangible results, and you may be embarrassed if you get caught. 

Offline Greebo

  • Skinner Team
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7073
Re: C-47 inappropriately named?
« Reply #1 on: June 04, 2011, 04:48:43 AM »
I think Wiki got it a bit wrong. The C-53 was basically a militarised version of the DC-3 airliner. It was used mostly for ferrying troops from base to base. It was the C-47 that had the reinforced floor and large two piece cargo door on the LH side of the fuselage. There were many thousands of C-47s built but only a few hundred C-53s.

Offline Bodhi

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8698
Re: C-47 inappropriately named?
« Reply #2 on: June 04, 2011, 09:37:19 AM »
You are going to find many paint schemes or liveries applied to aircraft might not necessarily match up with the data plates.  It is usually a concession to the fact that the original model is not available.  It's simply a fact of life.
I regret doing business with TD Computer Systems.

Offline Guppy35

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 20386
Re: C-47 inappropriately named?
« Reply #3 on: June 04, 2011, 10:38:20 PM »
Are you suggesting that HTC change the designation of the game Gooney to C53?  Or are you just referencing the one under restoration being designated C53?
Dan/CorkyJr
8th FS "Headhunters

Offline Raptor05121

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 486
Re: C-47 inappropriately named?
« Reply #4 on: June 07, 2011, 02:55:43 PM »
Well from what I read the C-53 was a C-47 specially made for paratroop operations. I wanted someone to confirm this. If it is the case I think it would be a typo of sorts but I still dont see HTC changing it- it would throw so many people off.
InGame: xRaptorx of the ***Alchemists***

Quote from: dirtdart
To suggest things that do not meet this basic criteria is equal to masturbation.  It may feel good to you, will not produce any tangible results, and you may be embarrassed if you get caught. 

Offline olds442

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2239
Re: C-47 inappropriately named?
« Reply #5 on: June 07, 2011, 03:21:43 PM »
Well from what I read the C-53 was a C-47 specially made for paratroop operations. I wanted someone to confirm this. If it is the case I think it would be a typo of sorts but I still dont see HTC changing it- it would throw so many people off.
  :rolleyes:


I think Wiki got it a bit wrong. The C-53 was basically a militarised version of the DC-3 airliner. It was used mostly for ferrying troops from base to base. It was the C-47 that had the reinforced floor and large two piece cargo door on the LH side of the fuselage. There were many thousands of C-47s built but only a few hundred C-53s.
only a moron would use Dolby positioning in a game.
IGN: cutlass "shovels and rakes and implements of destruction"

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: C-47 inappropriately named?
« Reply #6 on: June 07, 2011, 03:37:48 PM »
Don't forget: Wiki is just user-supplied data. Even when an entry is quoting a book, some books get things wrong too!

(Heck, I've even seen Jane's series of books get stuff wrong, and that's one with a decent reputation!)

Offline Wedge1126

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 166
Re: C-47 inappropriately named?
« Reply #7 on: June 07, 2011, 03:39:15 PM »
Wikipedia says the C-53 is the" Troop transport version of the C-47."
Wedge

Offline MiloMorai

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6864
Re: C-47 inappropriately named?
« Reply #8 on: June 07, 2011, 04:22:44 PM »
There's a "DC-3" here locally getting restored. On the AAC serial plate, its listed as a C-53D. Quickly browsing Wiki, its shows the C-47 as a transport/cargo plane and the C-53 as a C-47 but a sturdier floor and larger door specifically made for paratroop application. Certifying this claim is that the "DC-3" getting restored was used in the paratroop drops on D-day and even pulled some CG-4A Wacos.

tl;dr- Should the name be changed to C-53 or am I missing something?

Squadron/Signal InAction on the C-53.

A purpose built troop transport. No triple opening large door but a single small door. The floor was not reinforced as troops were the cargo carried. Some had a small cleat added for towing a glider. 28 metal seats were attached to the fuselage wall. P&W R-1830-92 engines.