To suggest things that do not meet this basic criteria is equal to masturbation. It may feel good to you, will not produce any tangible results, and you may be embarrassed if you get caught.
Well from what I read the C-53 was a C-47 specially made for paratroop operations. I wanted someone to confirm this. If it is the case I think it would be a typo of sorts but I still dont see HTC changing it- it would throw so many people off.
I think Wiki got it a bit wrong. The C-53 was basically a militarised version of the DC-3 airliner. It was used mostly for ferrying troops from base to base. It was the C-47 that had the reinforced floor and large two piece cargo door on the LH side of the fuselage. There were many thousands of C-47s built but only a few hundred C-53s.
only a moron would use Dolby positioning in a game.
There's a "DC-3" here locally getting restored. On the AAC serial plate, its listed as a C-53D. Quickly browsing Wiki, its shows the C-47 as a transport/cargo plane and the C-53 as a C-47 but a sturdier floor and larger door specifically made for paratroop application. Certifying this claim is that the "DC-3" getting restored was used in the paratroop drops on D-day and even pulled some CG-4A Wacos.tl;dr- Should the name be changed to C-53 or am I missing something?