Author Topic: German Heavy Bomber  (Read 1811 times)

Offline bortas1

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1228
Re: German Heavy Bomber
« Reply #30 on: July 13, 2011, 01:22:40 PM »
Essentially a long-range airliner converted to maritime patrol (light bomb load to drop on shipping) but it was not a heavy bomber. It was large and it was decidedly fragile, often breaking its own back when landing.
:salute thanks krusty

Offline fbWldcat

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2970
Re: German Heavy Bomber
« Reply #31 on: July 13, 2011, 02:12:10 PM »
aka b29

Once they worked the problems out of the 3350, the engine was a reliable, powerful, and effective one. Like almost every other engine you ever come across in ANY aviation, the engines go through trial and error, and therefore, improvement.

And you're really talking about apples to oranges. The B-29 became a workhorse alongside the B-17 and B-24. Eventually dropping Fat man and Little Boy, they dropped incendiaries on major Japanese cities before then. The B-29 was a vastly more effective and widely used aircraft than the 177.
« Last Edit: July 13, 2011, 02:15:25 PM by fbWldcat »
Landing is overrated.
"Two roads diverged in a wood, and I: I took the one less traveled by." - Robert Frost
"Uncommon valor was a common virtue." <S>

Offline Raptor05121

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 486
Re: German Heavy Bomber
« Reply #32 on: July 13, 2011, 02:14:42 PM »
Once they worked the problems out of the 3350, the engine was a reliable, powerful, and effective one. Like almost every other engine you ever come across in ANY aviation, the engines go through trial and error, and therefore, improvement.

sans the Lycoming O-320
InGame: xRaptorx of the ***Alchemists***

Quote from: dirtdart
To suggest things that do not meet this basic criteria is equal to masturbation.  It may feel good to you, will not produce any tangible results, and you may be embarrassed if you get caught. 

Offline Debrody

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4487
Re: German Heavy Bomber
« Reply #33 on: July 13, 2011, 02:17:52 PM »
hmmm sirs, someone really dont wanna see the 177...
me neither, i would vote to the 188, but some of you act like an inverse WMaker:
it was a crapppp
 :devil
AoM
City of ice