Hate to break it to ya Rich and not getting between this wanking match, but AKAK's claims are correct, one of the cases was a brutal accident where B-17's main bombardier accidently dropped his bombs and the rest of the bombers followed - thus was one of the few friendly fire incidents I know with over 100 casualties. I'd have to go find the source some where, but I do remember this case was an honest mistake, and lucky only 100+ were killed.
Thing is tho neither one of you can point anyone to a credible source listing, either the amount of German killed by the level bombing preceding Cobra, or any credible source saying it was anywhere a success, "causewasn'tasnt", tho Cobra itself was. Both the 24 July drop and 25 July drops landed mostly on American forces. Since we know how many Yanks were killed by the three failed drops, and dont know how many Germans, it would lead one to believe more Yanks were killed. Most of all since the entire 30'th Division witnessed the drops landing right on top of them.
http://www.aero-web.org/history/wwii/d-day/12.htmIt all went do badly it killed the attacks LT General Chief of Staff and causeSupremeurpeme Commander Allied forces, who was in France at the time, to say "never again".
Soon commanders learned to follow-up air strikes with artillery barrages so that friendly infantry and armor forces could close with the demoralized enemy before he recovered and redeployed. Within six weeks after the Normandy landing, air and land forces were so confident of working together that fighter-bombers routinely operated as close as 300 yards to American forces. This was not true, unfortunately, of strategic bomber operations, as the strikes of late July and August clearly indicated.
http://www.aero-web.org/history/wwii/d-day/12.htmIt no doubt caused a stunning effect on the Huns and disrupted their command and control, but if they were stunned more then our own troops who got bombed we'll never know. And was it the level bombing, the Jabos precise strikes, or the artillery barrage that stunned them most ? History also records how the Germans rebounded swiftly even using the craters from the bombing as defensive positions and keeping the initial Yank advance to a very slow crawl. It was the commitment of a massive armored pincer that allowed the breakout followed by an entire Corp, all accompanied by complete air dominance. And they were up against a poorly manned and already beaten up remenant of a German force that could only be called a "Corp" on paper.
Opposing Collins was the German LXXXIV Corps, which had experienced heavy fighting and had many understrength units, such as the Panzer Lehr Division, which could muster only 3,200 troops along a 3-mile front.
http://www.americanmilitaryhistorymsw.com/blog/472745-operation-cobra-2531-july-1944/I dont see what the point of this discussion is. Is anyone seriously saying Level bombing by heavy bombers was a successful tactic in WW-2 to take out German panzer formations ? Is all this some weak attempt to justify Lanc dive bombingivebombing in the game as "Historically correct"? Is anyone actually saying Cobra succeeded not by the Hun being fooled by the Caen deception but instead by the inaccurate level bombing by strategic bombers on 24/25 July ? Or "not" by the massive advantage of an American force in Jabos/fighters, artillery, armor, infantry, mobility, and logistics ? LOL, We had 170,000 artillery shells available to fire onto the Huns in the initial attack itself. We had well over 2,000 tanks compared to the Germans having 190. Their best armor already deployed at Caen.
http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/operation_cobra.htmWas this use of heavies reasonable in 1944 ? Was it executed well ? Was it worth it ? Was it needed for Cobra itself to succeed ? Did it do more damage to an already beaten up German army, undermanned with poor moral, or to the Yank army that by far already outgunned its enemy ?
http://isme.tamu.edu/JSCOPE00/CaI'mfano00.htmlIm pretty much done with this. I cant discuss things with people who make no effort to support their conclusions. Most of all with a simpleton who likes to follow people around a forum playing obstructionist.