Battlefield ...man its rockin

[Reschke]

I don't guess its a secret that the Alpha is out and people are playing it. If anyone is looking for someone to join up on a server just let me know. I go by Coachwill on Origin.

[redman555]

BF3 will destroy COD, it beat COD at every award, it looks absolutely amazing, I have gotten my email for beta, but didnt get in for Alpha  I cant even explain how excited I am for BF3 release, ive had it pre ordered since febuary. I have every BF ever made, and LUV them

The main thing I like the most about BF is the aspect of TEAMWORK, a lot of shooters today ONE person can win the game (such as COD), but in BF one person cant win, you have to work together, theres no auto aim, so requires better skill. I am personally A very good sniper, I love the aspect of bullet drop, and how much realistic BF is, I love blowing peoples heads off when their running and on other side of map. Ive gotten accused of hacks a few times.

I joined this game late, all kills with SV98, and all were done at 600-1,000 meters on arica harbor

I know my Camera sucks lol








-BigBOBCH

[Pigslilspaz]

SV98, nice choice. Best gun in the game imho. Just started playing BFBC2 at the start of summer cause it was dirt cheap. Already have gold star 1 on every gun  .

[TonyJoey]

Redman, different people like different things. I have both Battlefield 2 and Black Ops and like them both, but if I had to pick one it would be Black Ops by far. Battlefield has much MUCH larger maps. I enjoy sniping on that game with the M95 from the back of the map, but rushing sucks. (BTW, the no sway on snipers in BF2 makes it very easy as compared to BO sniping) You have to run for 2 minutes just to get in a battle. Then, you get a couple kills, get killed, and have to make the trek all over again. CoD is much more fast-paced, and with what I've heard, MW3 will be more focused on gun-on-gun battles instead of killstreaks and air support. As for teamwork, it is essential if you want to win in CoD. I play with a party on public matches and we're making call-outs and using strategy non-stop throughout the game.

[redman555]

Redman, different people like different things. I have both Battlefield 2 and Black Ops and like them both, but if I had to pick one it would be Black Ops by far. Battlefield has much MUCH larger maps. I enjoy sniping on that game with the M95 from the back of the map, but rushing sucks. (BTW, the no sway on snipers in BF2 makes it very easy as compared to BO sniping) You have to run for 2 minutes just to get in a battle. Then, you get a couple kills, get killed, and have to make the trek all over again. CoD is much more fast-paced, and with what I've heard, MW3 will be more focused on gun-on-gun battles instead of killstreaks and air support. As for teamwork, it is essential if you want to win in CoD. I play with a party on public matches and we're making call-outs and using strategy non-stop throughout the game.

No idea what your talking about....it takes me about 30 seconds to get into a fire fight....and I end games with over 50-60 kills when I play assault kit....and you dont have to make the trek all over again...thats the point of taking flags.... /facepalm.  COD Is to easy, thats my point, the entire game is point and shoot. Gun damage is SUPER unrealistic, kick is total BS, shotguns have like 10 yard range in COD, in BF its like a REAL shotgun....COD is over with, seems like every one made is the same thing, just different maps and different guns....most have the same guns...And you say BF isnt fast paced? lol, dude idk what game type your playing, but BFBC2 is very fast paced. Also, it is much harder to snipe in BF, expecially when your firing close to 1,000+ meters....there's no auto aim or quick scoping like in COD as well...

-BigBOBCH

[Wildcat1]

Redman, different people like different things. I have both Battlefield 2 and Black Ops and like them both, but if I had to pick one it would be Black Ops by far. Battlefield has much MUCH larger maps. I enjoy sniping on that game with the M95 from the back of the map, but rushing sucks. (BTW, the no sway on snipers in BF2 makes it very easy as compared to BO sniping) You have to run for 2 minutes just to get in a battle. Then, you get a couple kills, get killed, and have to make the trek all over again. CoD is much more fast-paced, and with what I've heard, MW3 will be more focused on gun-on-gun battles instead of killstreaks and air support. As for teamwork, it is essential if you want to win in CoD. I play with a party on public matches and we're making call-outs and using strategy non-stop throughout the game.

There is no teamwork needed in cod. One guy gets hot and calls in a nuke, game over. In battlefield, you have to coordinate tactics and take on a common objective if you want to succeed.

[redman555]

There is no teamwork needed in cod. One guy gets hot and calls in a nuke, game over. In battlefield, you have to coordinate tactics and take on a common objective if you want to succeed.

EXACTLY, that is why I like BF more, you have to work together, you have to work as a team. Back when I played COD, I would go 64-2 in a TDM, I won the dang game lol.  I like the teamwork aspect, it makes it more fun.

-BigBOBCH

[TonyJoey]

In my experience, Battlefield 2 is not fast paced at all. I play Rush with the bombsights so if it's completely different in the one other game type, I apologise. Your statement about going 64-2 in TDM is completely accurate. However, play Demo or Dom, and you can't win it by yourself. Wildcat, no nuke in Black Ops nor will there be in MW3. Another thing, BF2 doesn't even have TDM so don't use that as an example to discount my point about teamwork. Again, in my experience, you don't have to work as a team at all in BF2 to win. In fact, its very rare to see people communicating to each other. It's just like Black Ops in the way that it's a team of lone wolfs. One person plants, the other people on the team see A bomb has been planted so they rush over there. Black Ops Demolition is identical.

[redman555]

In my experience, Battlefield 2 is not fast paced at all. I play Rush with the bombsights so if it's completely different in the one other game type, I apologise. Your statement about going 64-2 in TDM is completely accurate. However, play Demo or Dom, and you can't win it by yourself. Wildcat, no nuke in Black Ops nor will there be in MW3. Another thing, BF2 doesn't even have TDM so don't use that as an example to discount my point about teamwork. Again, in my experience, you don't have to work as a team at all in BF2 to win. In fact, its very rare to see people communicating to each other. It's just like Black Ops in the way that it's a team of lone wolfs. One person plants, the other people on the team see A bomb has been planted so they rush over there. Black Ops Demolition is identical.

Are you talking about BF2....or BFBC2...lol because BFBC2 you HAVE TO work as a team....

-BigBOBCH

[TonyJoey]

I'm talking about BC2. One lone wolf plants, the rest of the lone wolfs hound the bomb, rinse and repeat. That's the only kind of teamwork I've ever witnessed in BC2.

[redman555]

I'm talking about BC2. One lone wolf plants, the rest of the lone wolfs hound the bomb, rinse and repeat. That's the only kind of teamwork I've ever witnessed in BC2.

Try playing TDM.....or other games, or your playing Xbox, which means your playing with mostly stupid kids lol.

-BigBOBCH

[TonyJoey]

And that's supposed to mean? I do play TDM a bit, but I mainly play domination with a party and we use teamwork to win games against other parties or whoever we may be facing. TDM, I'll admit takes no teamwork, but that's moot seeing as BC2 doesn't even have that game type.

[Tyrannis]

And that's supposed to mean? I do play TDM a bit, but I mainly play domination with a party and we use teamwork to win games against other parties or whoever we may be facing. TDM, I'll admit takes no teamwork, but that's moot seeing as BC2 doesn't even have that game type.

if by TDM you mean "team death match" then yes, bc2 DOES have it. they just call it "squad death match". wich imo, i prefer more.

[Vulcan]

kick is total BS, shotguns have like 10 yard range in COD, in BF its like a REAL shotgun....

comon you can't use the terms real and guns and bf in the same paragraph

[Wildcat1]

And that's supposed to mean? I do play TDM a bit, but I mainly play domination with a party and we use teamwork to win games against other parties or whoever we may be facing. TDM, I'll admit takes no teamwork, but that's moot seeing as BC2 doesn't even have that game type.

Yes it does, squad death match. But anyways rush is great because its objective-based. You don't win battles in real life by having a few good killers getting hot, the whole side needs to accomplish their objectives.

IMO, cod is great for its target audience: entry-level shooters looking for a fast-paced, cartoonish shoot-em-up. Battlefield, on the other hand, is targeted towards those who appreciate realism.