Author Topic: TANKS WON'T Climb a fluff'n BB!!  (Read 673 times)

Offline Tiwolf

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1
TANKS WON'T Climb a fluff'n BB!!
« on: September 10, 2011, 03:47:35 PM »
Come on guys, What up with the tanks!! This BS!  :bhead

Offline MachFly

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6296
Re: TANKS WON'T Climb a fluffluff'n BB!!
« Reply #1 on: September 10, 2011, 05:03:40 PM »
So what's the bug?
"Now, if I had to make the choice of one fighter aircraft above all the others...it would be, without any doubt, the world's greatest propeller driven flying machine - the magnificent and immortal Spitfire."
Lt. Col. William R. Dunn
flew Spitfires, Hurricanes, P-51s, P-47s, and F-4s

Offline caldera

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6437
Re: TANKS WON'T Climb a fluffluff'n BB!!
« Reply #2 on: September 10, 2011, 06:43:20 PM »
That is BS.  I can't even find the climb rate charts for any of the ground vehicles!   :furious
"Then out spake brave Horatius, the Captain of the gate:
 To every man upon this earth, death cometh soon or late.
 And how can man die better, than facing fearful odds.
 For the ashes of his fathers and the temples of his Gods."

Offline gyrene81

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11629
Re: TANKS WON'T Climb a fluffluffluff'n BB!!
« Reply #3 on: September 10, 2011, 07:47:11 PM »
That is BS.  I can't even find the climb rate charts for any of the ground vehicles!   :furious
ROFLMAO!!!  :rofl  :lol  :rofl  :lol




Come on guys, What up with the tanks!! This BS!  :bhead
do you know what the max grade rating is for each tank in ah? (maximum grade rating is the steepest angle a tank can traverse in the lowest gear)
jarhed  
Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day...
Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. - Terry Pratchett

Offline MachFly

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6296
Re: TANKS WON'T Climb a fluffluffluff'n BB!!
« Reply #4 on: September 10, 2011, 07:49:55 PM »
That is BS.  I can't even find the climb rate charts for any of the ground vehicles!   :furious

 :rofl
"Now, if I had to make the choice of one fighter aircraft above all the others...it would be, without any doubt, the world's greatest propeller driven flying machine - the magnificent and immortal Spitfire."
Lt. Col. William R. Dunn
flew Spitfires, Hurricanes, P-51s, P-47s, and F-4s

Offline guncrasher

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17360
Re: TANKS WON'T Climb a fluffluff'n BB!!
« Reply #5 on: September 10, 2011, 07:59:27 PM »
ask dr7 i saw him climb a hill then pawn the tanks as they couldn't elevate their turrets that high  :rofl.

semp
you dont want me to ho, dont point your plane at me.

Offline skorpion

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3798
Re: TANKS WON'T Climb a fluffluff'n BB!!
« Reply #6 on: September 10, 2011, 08:21:11 PM »
That is BS.  I can't even find the climb rate charts for any of the ground vehicles!   :furious

 :rofl :rofl :rofl

 :lol

Offline lyric1

  • Skinner Team
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10632
Re: TANKS WON'T Climb a fluffluffluffluffluff'n BB!!
« Reply #7 on: September 11, 2011, 12:04:13 AM »
That is BS.  I can't even find the climb rate charts for any of the ground vehicles!   :furious

Done. :headscratch: Well sort of.

Looks like anything beyond 30/35 degrees the tanks don't do so well? Except for the M4
60 degrees. :aok

Also not the difference on cross country speed?

Since we are on grass in most cases should this not be programmed in to the game?

Seems the lighter tanks have a much higher cross country speed. A game changer from my point of view if the lighter armed tanks can out pace their heavier enemies.


M4/75.
http://ww2total.com/WW2/Weapons/Vehicles/Tanks/US/Sherman-tank/M4-Sherman.htm

M4/76.
http://ww2total.com/WW2/Weapons/Vehicles/Tanks/US/Sherman-tank/Sherman-tank-76mm.htm

T34/76.
http://ww2total.com/WW2/Weapons/Vehicles/Tanks/Russian/T34-tank/T34-Model-1940.htm
http://ww2total.com/WW2/Weapons/Vehicles/Tanks/Russian/T34-tank/T34.htm

T34/85.
http://ww2total.com/WW2/Weapons/Vehicles/Tanks/Russian/T34-tank/T-34-85.htm

Firefly.
No data.
http://ww2total.com/worldwar2/weapons-WW2/vehicles/tanks/allies/uk/Sherman_Firefly/Sherman_Firefly-en.htm

Panzer IV.

http://ww2total.com/WW2/Weapons/Vehicles/Tanks/German/Panzer-IV/Panzer-IV-H.htm

Tiger I.

http://ww2total.com/WW2/Weapons/Vehicles/Tanks/German/PzKpfw-VI-Tiger/Tiger-tank.htm

Tiger II.
No data.
http://ww2total.com/worldwar2/weapons-WW2/vehicles/tanks/axis/germany/Panzerkampfwagen_VI_Tiger_II/Panzerkampfwagen_VI_Ausf_B_Tiger_II-en.htm

Panther.
http://ww2total.com/WW2/Weapons/Vehicles/Tanks/German/Panzer-V-Panther/Panther-tank.htm
« Last Edit: September 11, 2011, 12:07:49 AM by lyric1 »

Offline gyrene81

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11629
Re: TANKS WON'T Climb a fluffluff'n BB!!
« Reply #8 on: September 11, 2011, 07:25:42 AM »
lyric, you might want to cross reference with some other sources...that 60 degrees on the sherman should be 60 percent which would be about 32 degrees.

http://afvdb.50megs.com/usa/m4sherman.html

http://www.wwiivehicles.com/usa/tanks-medium/m4.asp

http://www.onwar.com/tanks/usa/index.htm

jarhed  
Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day...
Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. - Terry Pratchett

Offline lyric1

  • Skinner Team
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10632
Re: TANKS WON'T Climb a fluffluffluff'n BB!!
« Reply #9 on: September 11, 2011, 01:11:47 PM »
lyric, you might want to cross reference with some other sources...that 60 degrees on the sherman should be 60 percent which would be about 32 degrees.

http://afvdb.50megs.com/usa/m4sherman.html

http://www.wwiivehicles.com/usa/tanks-medium/m4.asp

http://www.onwar.com/tanks/usa/index.htm


Thank you. Was dragging arse last night when I posted,as slow as the tanks seem to be for climbing hills now??? Maybe they are closer to reality than what we had prior to the changes? Still think the cross country speeds should be looked at rather than the balls to the wall AHII speeds that we have now.

This would give lighter tanks a big advantage for flanking heavy armour.

Offline SmokinLoon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6168
Re: TANKS WON'T Climb a fluffluffluffluff'n BB!!
« Reply #10 on: September 13, 2011, 03:06:42 PM »
Thank you. Was dragging arse last night when I posted,as slow as the tanks seem to be for climbing hills now??? Maybe they are closer to reality than what we had prior to the changes? Still think the cross country speeds should be looked at rather than the balls to the wall AHII speeds that we have now.

This would give lighter tanks a big advantage for flanking heavy armour.

Half the problem with that is there is no repercussion for ramming a tree, no gullys to get trapped in, no stream beds to slow down for an ford, no boulders to get hung up on, etc etc.  Just a few smaller mounds to drive around.  I understand the concern with the top speeds being road speeds, but how else could HTC limit the tank speeds?  Coding swamps, bogs, gravel, dips, mud, soft dirt, packed dirt, etc etc can only be a major undertaking.  HTC has already shown to be hesitant to limit the top speeds and abilities of aircraft via weather conditions and that is easy to do, so adding in ground conditions to limit the speeds of gv's would be even tougher.  On the same note, I doubt HTC would put a speed limiter on gv's either.  Just a hunch though.
Proud grandson of the late Lt. Col. Darrell M. "Bud" Gray, USAF (ret.), B24D pilot, 5th BG/72nd BS. 28 combat missions within the "slot", PTO.

Offline Babalonian

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5817
      • Pigs on the Wing
Re: TANKS WON'T Climb a fluffluffluff'n BB!!
« Reply #11 on: September 13, 2011, 03:07:09 PM »
lyric, you might want to cross reference with some other sources...that 60 degrees on the sherman should be 60 percent which would be about 32 degrees.

http://afvdb.50megs.com/usa/m4sherman.html

http://www.wwiivehicles.com/usa/tanks-medium/m4.asp

http://www.onwar.com/tanks/usa/index.htm




60% is a 31-degree incline (30.9638 if you want to get down to splitting the hairs).
-Babalon
"Let's light 'em up and see how they smoke."
POTW IIw Oink! - http://www.PigsOnTheWing.org

Wow, you guys need help.

Offline Babalonian

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5817
      • Pigs on the Wing
Re: TANKS WON'T Climb a fluffluffluffluffluff'n BB!!
« Reply #12 on: September 13, 2011, 03:10:31 PM »
Half the problem with that is there is no repercussion for ramming a tree, no gullys to get trapped in, no stream beds to slow down for an ford, no boulders to get hung up on, etc etc.  Just a few smaller mounds to drive around.  I understand the concern with the top speeds being road speeds, but how else could HTC limit the tank speeds?  Coding swamps, bogs, gravel, dips, mud, soft dirt, packed dirt, etc etc can only be a major undertaking.  HTC has already shown to be hesitant to limit the top speeds and abilities of aircraft via weather conditions and that is easy to do, so adding in ground conditions to limit the speeds of gv's would be even tougher.  On the same note, I doubt HTC would put a speed limiter on gv's either.  Just a hunch though.

Actualy, given what was possible before the major vehicle update this year (find a hill, stop vehicle at the top, put her in neutral, release the brakes, hold on!), many would argue that he already has and very recently implimented a speed limiter on all GVs.
-Babalon
"Let's light 'em up and see how they smoke."
POTW IIw Oink! - http://www.PigsOnTheWing.org

Wow, you guys need help.

Offline Mano

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2191
Re: TANKS WON'T Climb a fluffluff'n BB!!
« Reply #13 on: September 13, 2011, 04:07:51 PM »
I found you can climb the steep hills with reverse. Reverse seems to be modeled similar to 1st gear.

GL,
Mano
Everything is funny as long as it is happening to somebody else.
- Will Rogers (1879 - 1935)